This study compared the effects of comprehension-fostering strategies on science and social studies texts with 54 eighth-grade students with learning disabilities who were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: (a) text-structure-based strategy, (b) paragraph restatement strategy, or (c) traditional instruction. In the text-structure-based condition, students were taught to identify three types of passages (main idea, list, and order) and to apply passage-type specific reading strategies. In the paragraph restatement condition, students were taught to apply a paragraph restatement strategy to all three types of passages. In the traditional instruction condition, students were taught to read passages, answer comprehension questions, and review responses. After instruction, students read and studied unfamiliar science and social studies passages and were given immediate, delayed, and transfer tests. Results indicated that text-structure-based reading strategies had a singnificant effect on (a) recall of central and incidental information over traditional instruction on immediate, delayed, and transfer tests; and (b) recall of central, but not incidental, information over the paragraph restatement strategy on all measures. Moreover, the paragraph restatement condition statistically outperformed the traditional instruction condition on all measures. Regardless of instructional condition, all students reported that the strategies were beneficial and that others should learn these strategies. Findings indicate that eighth-grade students with learning disabilities can learn, apply, and transfer complex text-structure-based strategies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bacon, E. H., & Carpenter, D. (1989). Learning disabled and nondisabled college students' use of structure in recall of stories and text. Learning Disability Quarterly, 12, 108–118.
2.
Billingsley, B. S., & Wildman, T. M. (1988). The effects of prereading activities on the comprehension monitoring of learning disabled adolescents. Learning Disabilities Research, 4(1), 36–44.
3.
Borkowski, J. G., Johnston, M. B., & Reid, M. K. (198). Metacognition, motivation, and controlled performance. In S.J. Ceci (Ed.), Handbook of cognitive, social, disabilities (Vol. 2, pp. 147–173). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4.
Bos, C. S., Anders, P. L., Filip, D., & Jaffe, L. E. (1989). The effects of an interactive instructional strategy for enhancing reading comprehension and content area learning for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 384–390.
5.
Carnine, D., & Silbert, J. (1979). Direct instruction reading. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
6.
Cook, L. K. (1983). Instructional effects of text structure-based reading strategies on the comprehension of scientific prose. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.
7.
Daniel, L., Ortleb, E. P., & Biggs, A. (1993). Life science. Lake Forest, IL: Macmillan/ McGraw-Hill.
8.
Darch, C., & Carnine, D. (1986). Teaching content area material to learning disabled students. Exceptional Children, 52, 240–246.
9.
Deshler, D. D., Ellis, E. S., & Lenz, B. K. (1996). Teaching adolescents with learning disabilities: Strategies and methods (2nd ed.) Denver: Love.
10.
Feather, R. M., Jr., Snyder, S. L., & Hesser, D. T. (1993). Earth science. Lake Forest, IL: Macmillan/McGraw-Hill.
11.
Ferguson, G. A., & Takane, Y. (1989). Statistical analysis in psychology and education. New York: McGraw-Hill.
12.
Fry, E. (1977). Fry's readability graph: Clarifications, validity, and extension to level 17. Journal of Reading, 21, 242–252.
13.
Glass, G. V., Peckham, P. D., & Sanders, J. R. (1972). Consequences of failure to meet assumptions underlying the analyses of variance and covariance. Review of Educational Research, 42, 237–288.
14.
Graves, A. W. (1986). Effects of direct instruction and metacomprehension training on finding main ideas. Learning Disabilities Research, 1, 90–100.
15.
Horton, S. V., & Lovitt, T. C. (1989). Using study guides with three classifications of secondary students. The Journal of Special Education, 22, 447–462.
16.
Jastak, S., & Wilkinson, G. S. (1984). The wide range achievement test-Revised. Wilmington, DE: Jastak Associates.
17.
Jenkins, J. R., Heliotis, J. D., Stein, M. L., & Haynes, M. C. (1987). Improving reading comprehension by using paragraph restatements. Exceptional Children, 54, 54–59.
18.
Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (1985). Kaufman test of educational achievement. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
19.
Kirk, R. E. (1982). Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
20.
Levin, J. R. (1983). Some methodological and statistical “bugs” in research on children's learning. In M. Pressley & C.J. Brainerd (Eds.), Cognitive learning and memory in children: Progress in cognitive development research (pp. 205–233). New York: Springer-Verlag.
21.
Malone, L. D., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1992). Reading comprehension instruction: Summarization and self-monitoring training for students with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 58, 270–279.
22.
Marascuilo, L. A., & Serlin, R. C. (1988). Statistical methods for the social and behavioral sciences. New York: Freeman.
23.
Markwardt, F. C. (1989). Peabody individual achievement test—Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
24.
Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (1994). Effective instruction for special education (2nd ed.) Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
25.
Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., Bakken, J. P., & Whedon, C. K. (1996). Reading comprehension: A synthesis of research in learning disabilities. In T. E. Scruggs & M. A. Mastropieri (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (Vol. 10, Part B, pp. 201–227). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
26.
McCormick, S., & Cooper, J. O. (1988). Investigation of a study technique to increase learning disabled students' reading comprehension of expository text (Final Report RF Project 765043/719898). Columbus: The Ohio State University Research Foundation.
Reich, J. R., & Biller, E. L. (1988). United States history. Austin, TX: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
29.
Salend, S.J. (1990). Effective mainstreaming. New York: Macmillan.
30.
Samuels, S.J. (1987). Information processing abilities and reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20(1), 18–20.
31.
Schumaker, J. B., Deshler, D. D., Alley, G. R., Warner, M. M., & Denton, P. H. (1982). Multipass: A learning strategy for improving reading comprehension. Learning Disability Quarterly, 5, 295–304.
32.
Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., McLoone, B. B., Levin, J. R., & Morrison, C. R. (1987). Mnemonic facilitation of learning disabled students' memory for expository prose. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 27–34.
33.
Siegel, S. (1956). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.
34.
Smith, P. L., & Friend, M. (1986). Training learning disabled adolescents in a strategy for using text structure to aid recall of instructional prose. Learning Disabilities Research, 2, 38–44.
35.
Snider, V. E. (1989). Reading comprehension performance of adolescents with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 12, 87–96.
36.
Sulzby, E., Hoffman, J., Niles, J., Shanahan, T., & Teale, W. H. (1989). Crystal stair: Grade eight. New York: McGraw-Hill.
37.
Talbott, E., Lloyd, J. W., & Tankersley, M. (1994). Effects of reading comprehension interventions for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 17, 223–232.
38.
Torgesen, J. K. (1985). Memory processes in reading disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 18, 350–357.
39.
Torgesen, J. K. (1986). Learning disabilities theory: Its current state and future prospects. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 399–407.
40.
Wechsler, D. (1974). Wechsler intelligence scale for children—Revised. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
41.
Wechsler, D. (1991). Wechsler intelligence scale for children (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
42.
Wechsler, D. (1992). Wechsler individual achievement test. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
43.
Wong, B. Y. L., & Jones, W. (1982). Increasing metacomprehension in learning disabled and normal achieving students through self-questioning training. Learning Disability Quarterly, 5, 228–240.
44.
Woodcock, R.W., & Johnson, M. B. (1988). Woodcock-Johnson test of achievement. Allen, TX: DLM.
