Whither Didst Thou Go? Retention,Reassignment,Migration,and Attrition of Special and General Education Teachers from a National Perspective

Abstract

In view of the paucity of national data on teacher retention, transfer, and attrition in special education, and the importance of these phenomena to teacher demand and shortage, we sought to provide such data from a national probability sample of 4,798 public school teachers from the 1988–1989 Teacher Followup Survey (Faupel, Bobbitt, & Friedrichs, 1992). The analysis focused on two main teaching fields (special and general education) and various aspects of teacher turnover. Results showed higher annual turnover for special education teachers (SFTs) than for general education teachers (GETs), in terms of both attrition from public school teaching (SETs = 8%; GETs = 6%) and transfer among public schools (SETs = 13%; GETs = 7%). However, the SET-GET difference in attrition percentages was modest in absolute terms, and lower than those reported from several states. SETs and GETs who left teaching did not differ significantly in postteaching activities or plans to return to teaching. The relationships between teacher turnover and teacher demand, shortage, recruitment, retention, and preparation are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Billingsley, B. S. (1993). Teacher retention and attrition in special and general education: A critical review of the literature. The Journal of Special Education, 27, 137–174.

Billingsley, B. S. , & Cross, L. H. (1991). Teachers' decisions to transfer from special to general education. The Journal of Special Education, 24, 496–511.

Bobbitt, S. A. , Faupel, E. & Burns, S. (1991). Characteristics of stayers, movers, and leavers: Results from the teacher followup survey, 1988--89. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics

Boe, E. E., Cook, L. H. Bobbitt, S. A. & Weber, A. L. (1995, May). Betention, transfer, and attrition of special and general education teachers in national perspective. Paper presented at the National Dissemination Forum on Issues Relating to Special Education Teacher Satisfaction, Retention and Attrition, Washington, DC.

Boe, E. E. , Cook, L. H. Kaufman, M. J. & Danielson, L. (1995). Special and general education teachers in public schools: Sources of supply in national perspective (Research Rep. 1995--TSD1). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Graduate School of Education, Center for Research and Evaluation in Social Policy.

Boe, E. E. & Gilford, D. M. (Eds.). (1992). Teacher supply, demand, and quality: Policy issues, models and data bases. Washington DC: National Academy Press

Brownell, M. T. , & Smith, S. W. (1992). Attrition/retention of special education teachers: Critique of current research and recommendations for retention efforts. Teacher Education and Special Education, 15, 229–248.

Choy, S. P. , Medrich, E. A. Henke, R. R. & Bobbitt, S. A. (1992). Schools and staffing in the United States: A statistical profile, 1987--88. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics

Faupel, E. , Bobbitt, S. & Friedrichs, K. (1992). 1988--89 teacher followup survey: Data file user's manual (NCES No. 92--058). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

10.

Kaufman, S. (1991). 1988 schools and staffing survey sample design and estimation. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics

11.

Kirby, S. N. , Grissmer, D. W. & Hudson, L. (1991). Sources of teacher supply: Some new evidence from Indiana. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 13, 256–268.

12.

Lauritzen, P. , & Friedman, S. J. (1995). Supply and demand of educational personnel for Wisconsin Public Schools: An examination of data trends. Whitewater: University of Wisconsin-Whitewater, Wisconsin Educator Supply and Demand Project

13.

McKnab, P. (1995). Attrition of special education personnel in Kansas from 1993--94 to 1994--95. Emporia, KS: Emporia State University, Division of Psychology and Special Education

14.

Office of Special Education Programs . (1994). Sixteenth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Education of Handicapped Act. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education

15.

Parshall, L. (1990). A study of the special education workforce in Michigan. Lansing, MI: Michigan Department of Education

16.

Rollefson, M. R. , & Broughman, S. P. (1995). Teacher supply in the United States: Sources of newly hired teachers in public and private schools 1988--1991. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics

17.

Schrag, J. A. , & Theobald, N. D. (1989). The adequacy of current and projected special education personnel supply in Washington state. Olympia. WA: Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction, Division of Special Services and Support Programs.

18.

Singer, J. D. (1993). Once is not enough: Former special educators who return to teaching. Exceptional Children, 60, 58–72.

19.

Whitener, S. , Kaufman, S. Rohr, C. Bynum, L. T. & King, K. (1994). 1991--92 teacher followup survey data file user's manual: Public use version. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.