Case Studies on Inclusion

Abstract

Zigmond and Baker's observations of inclusion programs for students with learning disabilities confirm my worst fears: that these programs would offer less individualized instruction to children; that they would suffer from some of the same problems of organization, planning, and coordination that affect current pull-out programs; that related services would not be more frequently offered than they are at present; and that, most especially, the value of the programs would be determined primarily by teacher and administrator “feelings” combined with, in some instances, parent “feelings,” rather than by objective “outcome” measures. Using examples drawn from the case descriptions, I raise questions about the practice and the validity of inclusion as described and concerns about its widespread adoption without supportive outcome data.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Edgar, E. , Levine, P. , Levine, R. , & Dubey, M. (1988). Washington State follow-along studies 1983–87: Final report. Seattle, WA: Child Development and Mental Retardation Center, Experimental Education Unit.

Hasazi, S. B. , Gordon, L. R. , & Roe, C. A. (1985). Factors associated with the employment status of handicapped youth in high school from 1979 to 1983. Exceptional Children, 51, 455–469.

Martin, E. W. (1974). Some thoughts on mainstreaming. Exceptional Children, 41, 150–154.

Martin, E. W. (1993). Learning disabilities: Myths and outcomes. In G. R. Lyon , D. B. Gray , J. Kavanagh , & N. Krasnegor (Eds.), Better understanding learning disabilities: New views from research and their implications for education and public policy (pp. 325–341). Baltimore: Brookes.

Martin, E. W. (1994a). Inclusion: Rhetoric and reality [Guest editorial]. Exceptional Parent, 24, 39–45.

Martin, E. W. (1994b, September). Public policy and learning disabilities. Paper presented at the Summit Conference on Learning Disabilities, Washington, DC.

Rogan, L. L. , & Hartman, L. D. (1990). Adult outcome of learning disabled students 10 years after initial follow-up. Learning Disability Focus, 5, 91–102.

Wagner, M. , Newman, L. , D'Amico, R. , Jay, E. D. , Butler-Nalin, P. , Marder, C. , & Cox, R. (1991). Youth with disabilities: How are they doing? The first comprehensive report from the National Longitudinal Trnsition Study of Special Education Students. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.

Wagner, M., D'Amico, R., Marder, C., Newman, L., & Blackorby, J. (1993). What happens next? Trends in postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities. The second comprehensive report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study of Special Education Students. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.

10.

Ysseldyke, J. E. , Algozzine, B. , Shinn, M. R. , & McGue, M. (1982). Similarities and differences between low achievers and students classified learning disabled. The Journal of Special Education, 16, 73–85.