THE IDENTIFICATION OF INDIVIDUALS WITH DISABILITIES IN NATIONAL DATABASES: CREATING A FAILURE TO COMMUNICATE

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze similarities and differences in how students with disabilities are identified in national databases. National data collection programs in the U.S. Departments of Education, Commerce, Labor, Justice, and Health and Human Services, as well as databases from the National Science Foundation, the American Council of Education, and the College Board, were examined. Nineteen national data collection programs were selected as being potentially useful in the extraction of policy-relevant information on the educational status and performance of students with disabilities. Among these 19 programs there was significant variability in the disability categories used. These programs were targeted for two reasons: (a) their potential usefulness in providing indicators of domains in key models of educational outcomes for children and youth with disabilities, and (b) their prominence in current efforts to monitor progress toward the attainment of national education goals. Discussed are issues related to improving disability identification in large-scale data collection programs and the effects of these issues on reporting policy-relevant information.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Algozzine, B. (1992). Including students with disabilities in systemic efforts to measure outcomes: Why ask why? Minneapolis: National Center for Educational Outcomes.

Bruininks, R. , Hill, B. , Weatherman, R. , & Woodcock, R. (1986). Inventory for client and agency planning. Chicago: Riverside.

Bruininks, R. , Thurlow, M. L. , & Ysseldyke, J. E. (1992) Assessing the right outcomes: Prospects for improving education for youth with disabilities. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 27(2), 93–100.

Heller, K. A. , Holtzman, W. , & Messick, S. (1982). Placing children in special education: A strategy for equity. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Hobbs, N. (1975). Issues in the classification of children. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Ingels, S.J. (1991, April). The problem of excluded baseline students in a school-based longitudinal study: Correcting national dropout estimates and accommodating eligibility change over time. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.

Lipsky, D. K. , & Gartner, A. (1989). Beyond separate education: Quality education for all. Baltimore: Brookes.

McGrew, K. S. , Algozzine, B. , Ysseldyke, J. E. , Thurlow, M. L. , & Spiegel, A. N. (1993). The identification of people with disabilities in national data bases: A failure to communicate (Technical Report 6). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.

McGrew, K. S. , Spiegel, A. N. , Thurlow, M. L. , Ysseldyke, J. E. , Bruininks, R. H. , & Shriner, J. G. (1992). Outcomes for children and youth with disabilities: Secondary analysis of national data collection programs (Working Paper 3). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.

10.

McGrew, K. S. , Thurlow, M. L. , Shriner, J. G. , & Spiegel, A. N. (1992). Inclusion of students with disabilities in national and state data collection programs (Technical Report 2). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.

11.

Odden, A. (1990). Educational indicators in the United States: The need for analysis. Educational Researcher, 19(5), 24–28.

12.

Pope, A. M. , & Tarlov, A. R. (Eds). (1991). Disability in America: Toward a national agenda for prevention. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

13.

Spencer, B. D. (1991). Eligibility/exclusion issues in the 1990 Trial State Assessment. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University, Methodology Research Center, NORC.

14.

Stainback, S. , Stainback, W. , & Forest, M. (1989). Educating all students in the mainstream of regular education. Baltimore: Brookes.

15.

U.S. Department of Education. (1992). Fourteenth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Author.

16.

Ysseldyke, J. (1987). Classification of handicapped students. In M. C. Wang , M. C. Reynolds , & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Handbook of special education: Research and practice (Volume 1, pp. 253–271). Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.

17.

Ysseldyke, J. E. , Algozzine, B. , & Thurlow, M. L. (1992). Critical issues in special education. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

18.

Ysseldyke, J. , Thurlow, M. , Bruininks, R. , Gilman, C. , Deno, S. , McGrew, K. , & Shriner, J. (1992). A conceptual model of educational outcomes for children and youth with disabilities (Working Paper 1). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.