Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

This study examined the effects of curriculum on the sensitivity of repeated curriculum-based measurement (CBM). Participants included 24 third-grade students who were instructed primarily in a literature-based Scott, Foresman basal series, and 24 third-grade students who were instructed primarily in a more traditional basal series. CBM passage probes from each basal reading series were administered to all students twice weekly over a 9-week period. Each student's rate of progress in each reading series was indexed using an ordinary least squares regression to determine the slope of the data series. Results suggested that passage probes selected from the literature-based basal series were less sensitive to indexing growth over time than those from the traditional basal series.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bartley, N. (1993). Literature-based integrated language instruction and the language-deficient student. Reading Research and Instruction, 32, 31–37.

Cooper, J. D. (1990). Literature-based learning—How and why it works: The proof of the pudding. Learning 90, 18, 40–42.

Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative. Exceptional Children, 52, 219–232.

Deno, S. L. , Mirkin, P. K. , & Chiang, B. (1982). Identifying valid measures of reading. Exceptional Children, 49, 35-45.

Derr-Minneci, T. F. , & Shapiro, E. S. (1992). Validating curriculum-based measurement in reading from a behavioral perspective. School Psychology Quarterly, 7, 2–16.

Fry, E. (1968). A readability formula that saves time. Journal of Reading, 11, 513–516.

Fuchs, L. S. , & Deno, S. L. (1991). Paradigmatic distinctions between instructionally relevant measurement models. Exceptional Children, 57, 488–500.

Fuchs, L. S. , & Deno, S. L. (1992). Effects of curriculum within curriculum-based measurement. Exceptional Children, 58, 232–242.

Fuchs, L. S. , Fuchs, D. , Hamlett, C. L. , Walz, L. , & Germann, G. (1993). Formative evaluation of academic progress: How much growth can we expect? School Psychology Review, 22, 27-48.

10.

Fuchs, L. S. , Fuchs, D. , & Maxwell, L. (1988). The validity of informal reading comprehension measures. Remedial and Special Education, 9(2), 20-29.

11.

Good, R. H. , & Shinn, M. R. (1990). Forecasting accuracy of slope estimates for reading curriculum-based measurement: Empirical evidence. Behavioral Assessment, 12, 179–193.

12.

Houghton Mifflin. (1986). Houghton Mifflin basal series. Boston: Author.

13.

Johnson, D. D. , Moe, A. J. , & Baumann, J. F. (1983). The Ginn word book for teachers: A basic lexicon. Lexington, MA: Ginn and Co.

14.

Marston, D. B. (1989). A curriculum-based measurement approach to assessing academic performance: What it is and why do it. In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 18-78). New York: Guilford.

15.

Scott, Foresman. (1989). Scott, Foresman reading. Glenview, IL: Author.

16.

Shapiro, E. S. (1989). Academic skills problems: Direct assessment and intervention. New York: Guilford.

17.

Shinn, M. R. (1988). Development of curriculum-based local norms for use in special education decision-making. School Psychology Review, 17, 61–80.

18.

Shinn, M. R. (Ed.). (1989). Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children. New York: Guilford.

19.

Shinn, M. R. , Good, R. H. , Knutson, N. , Tilly, W. D. , & Collins, V. L. (1992). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency: A confirmatory analysis of its relation to reading. School Psychology Review, 21, 459–479.

20.

Shinn, M. R. , Good, R. J. , & Stein, S. (1989). Summarizing trend in student achievement: A comparison of methods. School Psychology Review, 18, 356–370.

21.

Tompkins, G. E. , & McGee, L. M. (1993). Teaching reading with literature: Case studies to action plans. New York: Macmillan.

The Effects of Curriculum on the Sensitivity of Curriculum-Based Measurement in Reading

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References