Abstract
Public school special education services may follow or be at variance with professional advocates, as is illustrated relative to Dunn and Deno. The tendency to overgeneralize from one population to another, especially to the socially and emotionally maladjusted, is seldom warranted and violates the individualized mandate of special education. Underlying issues in inclusion are discussed: extruded education as flawed, special/regular education responsibilities, the nature of individual differences, the role of caring in special education, and help for the classroom teacher. Several hopeful signs are reviewed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
