The seminal works by Dunn (1968) and Deno (1970) have had a significant effect on the field of special education. Although the emphasis of these two papers was by no means limited to issues concerning placement, nevertheless, much of their influence has been in regard to the issue of where students with disabilities should be educated. The literature in the field for the quarter century since publication of these two articles has been replete with papers advocating for various placement options. This emphasis on placement has often resulted in somewhat diminished attention to important questions concerning the content of educational programs. In particular, curricular concerns warrant paramount attention for adolescents who have disabilities. This concern is reinforced by the literature on adult outcomes, which paints a rather pessimistic picture of adult adjustment for students exiting from special education programs. Therefore, we contend that issues of educational service delivery should be secondary to an emphasis on outcomes and the nature of the curriculum. In particular, the curriculum for all students in the secondary schools should provide multiple pathways that emphasize the development of skills and opportunities to become productive citizens with a reasonable opportunity to enjoy a positive quality of life. The paper also discusses current and emerging curricular models for students with mild disabilities, which are related to our concern for successful adult adjustment.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Affleck, J. Q., Edgar, E., Levine, P., & Kortering, L. (1990). Postschool status of students classified as mildly mentally retarded, learning disabled, or nonhandicapped: Does it get better with time?Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 25, 315–324.
2.
Allen-Hagen, B. (1991, January). Public juvenile facilities: Children in custody 1989. OJJDP Update on Statistics, pp. 1–10.
3.
Alley, G. R., & Deshler, D. D. (1979). Teaching the learning disabled adolescent: Strategies and methods. Denver: Love.
4.
Bauwens, J., Hourcade, J., & Friend, M. (1989). Cooperative teaching: A model for general and special education integration. Remedial and Special Education, 10(2), 17–22.
5.
Berliner, D. C. (1992, February). Educational reform in an era of disinformation. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, San Antonio.
6.
Blackorby, J., Edgar, E., & Kortering, L. (1991). A third of our youth? A look at the problem of high school dropout among students with mild handicaps. The Journal of Special Education, 25, 102–112.
7.
Brown v. the Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
8.
Children's Defense Fund. (1989). Lack of health insurance makes a difference. Washington, DC: Adolescent Pregnancy Prevention Clearing House, Children's Defense Fund.
9.
Cronin, M.E. (1988). Adult performance outcomes/life skills. In G. Robinson, J. R. Patton, E. A. Polloway, & L. Sargent (Eds.), Best practices in mental disabilities (Vol. 2, pp. 39–52). Des Moines: Iowa State Department of Education.
10.
Deno, E. (1970). Special education as developmental capital. Exceptional Children, 37, 229–237.
11.
Deshler, D. D., & Schumaker, J. B. (1986). Learning strategies: An instructional alternative for low-achieving adolescents. Exceptional Children, 52, 583–589.
12.
Dunn, L. M. (1986). Special education for the mildly retarded: Is much of it justifiable?Exceptional Children, 35, 5–22.
13.
Edgar, E., & Siegel S. (in press). Postsecondary scenarios for troubled and troubling youth. In J. M. Kauffman, J. W. Lloyd, T. A. Astuto, & D. P. Hallahan (Eds.), Issues in the educational placement of pupih with emotional or behavioral disorders.
14.
Ellis, E. S., Lenz, K., & Sabornie, E. J. (1987). Generalization and adaptation of learning strategies to natural environments: Part 2---Research into practice. Remedial and Special Education, 8(2), 6–23.
15.
Engelmann, A., Becker, W. C., Hanner, S., & Johnson, G. (1989). Corrective reading program. Chicago: Science Research Associates.
16.
Epstein, M. H., & Cullinan, D. (1987). Effective social skills curricula for behaviorally disordered students. Pointer, 31(2), 21–24.
17.
Gill, D., & Edgar, E. (1990). Outcomes of a vocational program designed for students with mild disabilities: The Pierce County Vocationai/Special Education Cooperative. The Journal of Vocational Special Needs Education, 12, 17–22.
18.
Gregory, R. P., Hackney, D., & Gregory, N. M. (1982). Corrective reading programe: An evaluation. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 52, 33–50.
19.
Halpern, A. W., & Benz, M. R. (1987). A statewide examination of special education for students with mild disabilities: Implications for the high school curriculum. Exceptional Children, 54, 122–129.
20.
Halpern, A. S., Doren, B., & Benz, M. B. (1993). Job experiences of students with disabilities during their last two years in school. Career Development for Exceptional Children, 16(1), 63–73.
21.
Hasazi, S., Gordon, L. R., & Roe, C. A. (1985). Factors associated with the employment status of handicapped youth exiting school from 1979 to 1983. Exceptional Children, 51, 455–469.
22.
Kolstoe, O. P., & Frey, R. M. (1965). A high school work-study program for mentally subnormal students. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
23.
Kozol, J. (1990). The night is dark and I am far from home. New York: Touchstone/Simon & Schuster.
24.
Lichtenstein, S. (1988). Special education dropouts. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management.
25.
Mauer, M. (1992). Americans behind bars: One year later. Washington, DC: The Sentencing Project.
26.
McBride, J. W., & Forgnone, C. (1985). Emphasis of instruction provided LD, EH, and EMR students in categorical and crosscategorical programming. Journal of Research Development in Education, 18(4), 50–54.
27.
McKenzie, R. G. (1991a). Content area instruction by secondary learning disabilities teachers: A national survey. Learning Disability Quarterly, 14, 115–122.
28.
McKenzie, R. G. (1991b). The form and substance of secondary resource models: Content area versus skills instruction. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 24, 467–470.
29.
Mithaug, D. E., Horiuchi, C. N., & Fanning, P.N. (1985). A report on the Colorado statewide follow-up survey of special education students. Exceptional Children, 51, 397–404.
30.
Moynihan, D. P. (1993). Defining deviancy down. The American Scholar, 62(1), 17–30.
31.
National Association of State Boards of Education. (1992). Winners all: A call for inclusive schools. Alexandria, VA: Author.
32.
Oakes, J. (1985). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
33.
Patton, J. R. & Browder, P. M. (1988). Transitions into the future. In B. L. Ludlow, A. P. Turnbull, & R. Luckasson (Eds.), Transitions to adult life for people with mental retardation: Principles and practices (pp. 293–311). Baltimore: Brookes.
34.
Patton, J. R., Polloway, E. A., & Epstein, M. H. (1987). Are there seminal works in special education?Remedial and Special Education, 10(2), 54–59.
35.
Phillips, K. (1991). The politics of rich and poor. New York: Harper Collins.
36.
Polloway, E. A., & Patton, J. R. (1991). Program design for students with mild disabilities. Des Moines: Iowa Department of Education.
37.
Polloway, E. A., & Patton, J. R. (1993). Strategies for teaching learners with special needs (5th ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
38.
Polloway, E. A., Epstein, M. H., Polloway, C. H., Patton, J. R., & Ball, D. W. (1986). Corrective reading program: An analysis of effectiveness with learning disabled and mentally retarded children. Remedial and Special Education, 7(4), 41–47.
39.
Polloway, E. A., Patton, J. R., Epstein, M. H., & Smith, T. E. C. (1989). Comprehensive curriculum for students with mild handicaps. Focus on Exceptional Children, 21(8), 1–12.
40.
Polloway, E. A., Patton, J. R., Smith, J. D., & Roderique, T. W. (1991). Issues in program design for elementary students with mild retardation: Emphasis on curriculum development. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 26, 142–150.
41.
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1966). Teachers' expectancies: Determinants of pupils' IQ gains. Psychology Reports, 19, 115–118.
42.
Schalock, R. L., Ross, I., Werbel, G., & Peterson, K. (1986). Post secondary community placement of handicapped students: A five year follow-up analysis. Learning Disability Quarterly, 9, 295–303.
43.
Sitlington, P. L., & Frank, A. R. (1990). Are adolescents with learning disabilities successfully crossing the bridge into adult life?Learning Disability Quarterly, 13, 97–111.
44.
Skrtic, T. M. (1991). The special education paradox: Equity as the way to excellence. Harvard Educational Review, 61, 148–206.
45.
Smith, S. (1990). Comparison of IEPs of students with behavioral disorders and learning disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 24, 85–99.
46.
Smith, T. E. C., & Hilton, A. (in press). Program design for students with mental retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation.
47.
Stevens, R., & Rosenshine, B. (1981). Ad vances in research on teaching. Exceptional Education Quarterly, 2(1), 1–9.
48.
Wagner, M., D'Amico, R., Marder, C., Newman. L., & Blackorby, J. (1992). What happens next? Trends in postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
49.
Weinstein, R. S., & Mayer, B. (1986). Learning strategies. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research in teaching (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.
50.
Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. Chicago: TheUniversity of Chicago Press.
51.
Zigmond, N. (1990). Rethinking secondary school programs for students with learning disabilities. Focus on Exceptional Children, 23,(1), 1–12.
