Abstract
The factor structure of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised (Wechsler, 1974) was examined in the standardization sample using methodological advances in exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Three competing models were evaluated: (a) a one-factor model, (b) an oblique (or correlated) two-factor model, and (c) an oblique three-factor model. Because of high correlations across factors, the discriminant validity of the two- and three-factor models was problematic. The substantial overlap across factors was most parsimoniously represented by a single general factor, consistent with the interpretations of O'Grady (1989). The competing factor models are discussed in relation to treatment utility and alternative assessment practices. Given the widespread use of the scale, the issues are of critical importance to public policy regarding the purposes and outcomes of special education assessments.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
