Differentiating Low Achieving Students and Students with Learning Disabilities

Abstract

While a large body of literature exists regarding the characteristics of students with learning disabilities (LD), there is still confusion and controversy regarding conceptual issues, even as to which variables are most important in defining LD. This study attempted to isolate which cognitive ability and academic achievement variables from the Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery (W-J) (Woodcock & Johnson, 1977) maximally separate students with LD (152) and low achieving (LA) (93) elementary and middle-school-age students. Significant differences were found between the LD and LA students on all but one W.J subtest, and certain academic achievement variables emerged as most critical in separating the two groups. Ability-achievement discrepancy scores (a) differed significantly between the two groups, but not to the extent that some of the academic achievement variables did, and (b) were applied inconsistently in the multidisciplinary team process. Implications for special education practitioners and administrators are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Algozzine, B. (1985). Low achiever differentiation: Where's the beef? Exceptional Children, 52, 72–75.

Algozzine, B. , & Ysseldyke, J.E. (1983). Learning disabilities as a subset of school failure: The over-sophistication of a concept. Exceptional Children, 50, 242–246.

Bryan, T. , Pearl R. , Donahue, M. , Bryan, J. , & Pflaum, S. (1983). The Chicago Institute for the Study of Learning Disabilities. Exceptional Education Quarterly, 4(1), 1–23.

Coles, G.J. (1988). The learning mystique: A critical look at "learning disabilities." New York: Pantheon.

Cone, T. , & Wilson, L. (1981). Quantifying a severe discrepancy: A critical analysis. Learning Disability Quarterly, 4, 359–371.

Cruickshank, W.M. (1984). Definition: A major issue in the field of learning disabilities. Journal of Rehabilitation, 2, 6–17.

Cummings, J.A. , & Moscato, E.M. (1984). Research on the Woodcock-Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery: Implications for practice and future investigations. School Psychology Review, 13, 33–40.

Epps, S. , Ysseldyke, J.E. , & McGue, M. (1984). "I know one when I see one"---Differentiating LD and non-LD students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 7, 89–101.

Fuchs, L.S. , & Fuchs, D. (1986). Linking assessment to instructional intervention: An overview. School Psychology Review, 15, 318–323.

10.

Howell, K.W. (1986). Direct assessment of academic performance. School Psychology Review, 15, 324–335.

11.

Kavale, K. , & Forness, S. (1985). The science of learning disabilities. San Diego: College Hill Press.

12.

Mercer, C.D. , Hughes, C. , & Mercer, A.R. (1985). Learning disabilities definitions used by state education departments. Learning Disability Quarterly, 8, 45–55.

13.

Merrell, K.W. , & Shinn, M.R. (1990). Critical variables in the learning disabilities identification process. School Psychology Review, 19, 72–80.

14.

Reeve, R.E. , Hall, R.J. , & Zakreski, R.S. (1979). The Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive Ability: Concurrent validity with the WISC-R. Learning Disability Quarterly, 2, 63–69.

15.

Reynolds, C.R. (1984). Critical measurement issues in learning disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 18, 451–476.

16.

Reynolds, C.R. , & Wilson, V.L. (1984). Another look at evaluating aptitudeachievement discrepancies in the diagnosis of learning disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 18, 477–487.

17.

Shinn, M.R. (1987). Development and use of local norms for curriculum-measurement. School Psychology Review, 17, 61–80.

18.

Thompson, P.L. , & Brassard, M.R. (1984). Cummings and Moscato soft on Woodcock-Johnson. School Psychology Review, 13, 41–44.

19.

Valus, A. (1986). Achievement-potential discrepancy status of students in LD programs. Learning Disability Quarterly, 9, 200–205.

20.

Wechsler, D. (1974). Wechsler intelligence scale for children-Revised. New York: Psychological Corp.

21.

Wilson, L.R. (1985). Large scale learning disability identification: The reprieve of a concept. Exceptional Children, 52, 44–51.

22.

Woodcock, R.W. (1984a). A response to some questions raised about the Woodcock-Johnson I. The mean discrepancy issue. School Psychology Review, 13, 342–354.

23.

Woodcock, R.W. (1984b). A response to some questions raised about the Woodcock-Johnson II: Efficacy of the aptitude clusters. School Psychology Review, 13, 355–362.

24.

Woodcock, R.W. , & Johnson, B.J. (1977). Woodcock Johnson Psycho-Educational Battery. Hingham, MA: Teaching Resources Corp.

25.

Ysseldyke, J.E. , Algozzine, B. , Richey, L. , & Graden, J. (1982). Declaring students eligible for learning disabilities services: Why bother with the data? Learning Disability Quarterly, 5, 37–44.

26.

Ysseldyke, J.E. , Algozzine, B. , Shinn, M. , & McGue, M. (1982). Similarities and differences between low achievers and students classified learning disabled. The Journal of Special Education, 16, 73–85.

27.

Ysseldyke, J.E. , Shinn, M.R. , & Epps, S.A. (1981). A comparison of the WISC-R and Woodcock-Johnson Tests of Cognitive Ability. Psychology in the Schools, 18, 15–19.