Proposals for radical reform or integration of special and general education, known as the Regular Education Initiative (REI), are consistent with the Reagan-Bush administration's agenda for education. Such proposals represesent a revolution in basic concepts related to the education of handicapped students that have provided the foundation of special education for over a century. As a political strategy, the REI is consistent with the Reagan-Bush tendency to focus on a small number of highly emotional issues that distract attention from deeper analysis-in this case, the issues of integration, nonlabeling, efficiency, and excellence. The REI is a flawed policy initiative that does not have the support of critical constituencies. Moreover, it rests on illogical premises, ignores the issue of specificity in proposed reforms, and reflects a cavalier attitude toward experimentation and research. Because the REI represents the policy preferences of a popular administration, it is not a dead issue. If meaningful reforms are to be achieved, however, several changes in direction are necessary: obtaining the support of critical constituencies, increasing attention to the effectiveness of educational strategies rather than the place in which they are implemented, and focusing efforts on incremental improvements in the current system.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderegg, M.L. (1989). Regular educators' responses to three key issues of the regular education initiative: An investigation of regular educators' experiences. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Georgia State University, Atlanta.
2.
Anderegg, M.L., & Vergason, G. (1988). An analysis of one of the cornerstones of the regular education initiative. Focus on Exceptional Children, 20(8), 1–7.
3.
Astuto, T.A., & Clark, D. (1988). State responses to the new federalism in education. Educational Policy, 2, 361–375.
4.
Biklen, D. (Ed.). (1985). Achieving the complete school.New York: Columbia University Press.
5.
Biklen, D., & Zollers, N. (1986). The focus of advocacy in the LD field. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 579–586.
6.
Braaten, S.R., Kauffman, J.M., Braaten, B., Polsgrove, L., & Nelson, C.M. (1988). The regular education initiative: Patent medicine for behavioral disorders. Exceptional Children, 55, 21–27.
7.
Bryan, J.H., & Bryan, T.H. (1988). Where's the beef? A review of published research on the Adaptive Learning Environment Model. Learning Disabilities Focus, 4(1), 9–14.
8.
Rubin, D.K., Bay, M., & Donahue, M. (1988). Implications of the learning disabilities definition for the regular education initiative. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 21–28.
9.
Buttram, J., & Kershner, K. (1989, March). A second look at special education in urban districts. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Research Association, San Francisco.
10.
Carlberg, C., & Kavale, K. (1980). The efficacy of special versus regular class placement for exceptional children: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Special Education, 14, 295–309.
11.
Carnine, D., & Kameenui, E. (1989). The regular education initiative and children with special needs: A false dilemma in the face of true problems. Unpublished manuscript, University of Oregon, Eugene.
12.
Clark, D.L., & Astuto, T.A. (1988). Education policy after Reagan-What next? Occasional Paper No. 6, Policy Studies Center of the University Council for Educational Administration, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
13.
Colvin, R.L. (1989). School finance: Equity concerns in an age of reforms. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 11–15.
14.
Council for Children with Behavioral Disorders. (1989). Position statement on the regular education initiative. Behavioral Disorders, 14, 201–208.
15.
Davis, W.E., (1989). The regular education initiative debate: Its promises and problems. Exceptional Children, 55, 440–446.
16.
Feniak, C.A. (1988). Labelling in special education: A problematic issue in England and Wales. International Journal of Special Education, 3, 117–124.
17.
Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L.S. (1988a). An evaluation of the Adaptive Learning Environments Model. Exceptional Children, 55, 115–127.
18.
Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L.S. (1988b). Response to Wang and Walberg. Exceptional Children, 55, 138–146.
19.
Gartner, A. (1989, April). Beyond mainstreaming: A critical look at integrating students with disabilities. Conference presentation, Buffalo, NY.
20.
Gartner, A., & Lipsky, D.K. (1987). Beyond special education: Toward a quality system for all students. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 367–395.
21.
Gartner, A., & Lipsky, D.K. (1989). The yoke of special education: How to break it.Rochester, NY: National Center on Education and the Economy.
22.
Gerber, M.M. (1988). Tolerance and technology of instruction: Implications for special education reform. Exceptional Children, 54, 309–314.
23.
Gerber, M.M., & Semmel, M.I. (1985). The microeconomics of referral and reintegration: A paradigm for evaluation of special education. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 11, 13–29.
24.
Hallahan D.P., & Kauffman, J.M. (1988). Exceptional children: Introduction to special education (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
25.
Hallahan, D.P., Keller, C.E., McKinney, J.D., Lloyd, J.W., & Bryan, T. (1988). Examining the research base of the regular education initiative: Efficacy studies and the adaptive learning environments model. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 29–35.
26.
Jenkins, J.R., & Heinen, A. (1989). Students' preferences for service delivery: Pull-out, in-class, or integrated models. Exceptional Children, 55, 516–523.
27.
Kauffman, J.M. (1987). Research in special education: A commentary. Remedial and Special Education, 8(6), 57–62.
28.
Kauffman, J.M. (1988a). Lessons in the nonrecognition of social deviance. In R.B. Rutherford, C.M. Nelson, & S.R. Forness (Eds.), Bases of severe behavioral disorders of children and youth (pp. 3-19). Boston: Little, Brown.
29.
Kauffman, J.M. (1988b). Revolution can also mean returning to the starting point: Will school psychology help special education make the circuit?. School Psychology Review, 17, 490–494.
30.
Kauffman, J.M. (1989). Characteristics of behavior disorders of children and youth (4th ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
Kauffman, J.M., & Pullen, P.L. (1989). REI movement throwing baby out with the bath?Virginia Journal of Education, 82(8), 16-19, 27.
33.
Kauffman, J.M., & Pullen, P.L. (in press). A personal perspective on our history of service to mildly handicapped and at-risk students. Remedial and Special Education.
34.
Keogh, B.K. (1888). Improving services for problem learners: Rethinking and restructuring. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 19–22.
35.
Lieberman, L.M. (1985). Special education and regular education: A merger made in heaven?. Exceptional Children, 51, 513–516.
36.
Lilly, M.S. (1988). The regular education initiative: A force for change in general and special education. Education and Training in Mental Retardation, 23, 253–260.
37.
Lipsky, D.K., & Gartner, A. (1987). Capable of achievement and worthy of respect: Education for handicapped students as if they were full-fledged human beings. Exceptional Children, 54, 69–74.
38.
Lloyd, J.W., Crowley, E.P., Kohler, F.W., & Strain, P.S. (1988). Redefining the applied research agenda: Cooperative learning, prereferral, teacher consultation, and peer-mediated interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 43–52.
39.
Marston, D. (1987-88). The effectiveness of special education: A time series analysis of reading performance in regular and special education settings. The Journal of Special Education, 21(4), 13–26.
40.
McKinney, J.D., & Hocutt, A.M. (1988a). Policy issues in the evaluation of the regular education initiative. Learning Disabilities Focus, 4(1), 15–23.
41.
McKinney, J.D., & Hocutt, A.M. (1988b). The need for policy analysis in evaluating the regular education initiative. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 12–18.
42.
Mesinger, J.F. (1985). Commentary on "A rationale for the merger of special and regular education" or, Is it now time for the lamb to lie down with the lion?. Exceptional Children, 51, 510–512.
43.
Miller, J.A. (1989). Bush floats plan to free schools from regulation. Education Week, 8(30), 1, 19.
44.
Minarik, J.J. (1988). Family incomes. In I.V. Sawhill (Ed.), Challenge to leadership: Economic and social issues for the next decade (pp. 33-66). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
45.
Minow, M. (1987). Learning to live with the dilemma of difference: Bilingual and special education. In K.T. Bartlett & J.W. Wenger (Eds.), Children with special needs (pp. 375-429). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
46.
National Center on Education and the Economy. (1989). To secure our future: The federal role in education.Rochester, NY: Author.
47.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
48.
O'Connor, P.D., Stuck, G.B., & Wyne, M.D. (1979). Effects of a short-term intervention resource-room program on task orientation and achievement. The Journal of Special Education, 13, 375–385.
49.
Pugach, M. (1987). THe national education reports and special education: Implications for teacher preparation. Exceptional Children, 53, 308–314.
50.
Pugach, M. (1988). Special education as a constraint on teacher education reform. Journal of Teacher Education, 39(3), 52–59.
51.
Reschly, D.J. (1988a). Special education reform: School psychology revolution. School Psychology Review, 17, 459–475.
52.
Reschly, D.J. (1988b). Obstacles, starting points, and doldrums notwithstanding: Reform/revolution from outcomes criteria. School Psychology Review, 17, 495–501.
53.
Reynolds, M.C., & Wang, M.C. (1983). Restructuring "special" school programs: A position paper. Policy Studies Review, 2(1), 189–212.
54.
Reynolds, M.C., Wang, M.C., & Walberg, H.J. (1987). The necessary restructuring of special and regular education. Exceptional Children, 53, 391–398.
55.
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. (1988, December). Serving handicapped children: A special report.Princeton, NJ: Author.
56.
Schumaker, J.B., & Deshler, D.D. (1988). Implementing the regular education initiative in secondary schools: A different ball game. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 36–42.
57.
Singer, J.D. (1988). Should special education merge with regular education?. Educational Policy, 2, 409–424.
58.
Singer, J.D., & Butler, J.A. (1987). The Education for All Handicapped Children Act: Schools as agents of social reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 125–152.
59.
Smith, T.W.D., Jr. (1988). The regular education initiative: A practitioner's view. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Virginia, Charlottesville.
60.
Snell, M.E. (1988). Gartner and Lipsky's Beyond Special Education: Toward a Quality System for All Students. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 13, 137–140.
61.
Stainback, S., & Stainback, W. (1985). The merger of special and regular education: Can it be done? A response to Lieberman and Mesinger. Exceptional Children, 51, 517–521.
62.
Stainback, S., & Stainback, W. (1987). Integration versus cooperation: A commentary on "Educating children with learning problems: A shared responsibility."Exceptional Children, 54, 66–68.
63.
Stainback, S., & Stainback, W. (1988). Letter to the editor. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21, 452–453.
64.
Stainback, S., & Stainback, W. (1989). No more teachers of students with severe handicaps. TASH Newsletter, 15(2), 9.
65.
Stainback, W., & Stainback, S. (1984). A rationale for the merger of special and regular education. Exceptional Children, 51, 102–111.
66.
Taylor, S.J. (1988). Caught in the continuum: A critical analysis of the principle of the least restrictive environment. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 13, 41–53.
67.
Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children. (1986). Message to all TED members concerning The National Inquiry into the Future of Education for Students with Special Needs.Reston, VA: Author.
68.
Van Houten, R., Axelrod, S., Bailey, J.S., Favell. J.E., Foxx, R.M., Iwata, B.A., & Lovaas, O.I. (1988). The right to effective behavioral treatment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21, 381–384.
69.
Vergason, G., & Anderegg, M.L. (in press). Save the baby!: An answer to integrating children of the second system. Phi Delta Kappan.
70.
Verstegen, D.A. (1984). The education block grant: A policy evaluation. Journal of Educational Equity and Leadership, 4, 290–303.
71.
Verstegen, D.A. (1985). Redistributing federal aid to education: Chapter 2 of the Education Consolidation and Improvement Act of 1981. Journal of Education Finance, 10, 517–523.
72.
Verstegen, D.A. (1987). Two hundred years of federalism: A perspective on national fiscal policy in education. Journal of Education Finance, 12, 516–548.
73.
Verstegen, D.A., & Clark, D.L. (1988). The diminution in federal expenditures for education during the Reagan administration. Phi Delta Kappan, 70, 134–138.
74.
Viadero, D. (1989). Panel asked to stop "morally wrong" application of special-education law. Education Week, 8(25), 26.
75.
Wang, M.C. (1980). Adaptive instruction: Building on diversity. Theory into Practice, 19(2), 122–127.
76.
Wang, M.C., & Birch, J.W. (1984). Comparison of a full-time mainstreaming program and a resource room approach. Exceptional Children, 51, 33–40.
77.
Wang, M.C., Peverly, S., & Randolph, R. (1984). An investigation of the implementation and effects of a full-time main-streaming program. Remedial and Special Education, 5(6), 21–32.
Wang, M.C., Reynolds, M.C., & Walberg, H.J. (1988). Integrating the children of the second system. Phi Delta Kappan, 70, 248–251.
80.
Wang, M.C., & Walberg, H.J. (1988). Four fallacies of segregationism. Exceptional Children, 55, 128–137.
81.
Will, M.C. (1984). Let us pause and reflect-but not too long. Exceptional Children, 51, 11–16.
82.
Will, M.C. (1986a). Educating children with learning problems: A shared responsibility. A report to the secretary.Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
83.
Will, M.C. (1986b). Educating children with learning problems: A shared responsibility. Exceptional Children, 52, 411–415.
84.
Will, M.C. (1988). Educating students with learning problems and the changing role of the school psychologist. School Psychology Review, 17, 476–478.
85.
Will, M.C. (1989). Individualization: Is it possible in the regular classroom?. Virginia Journal of Education, 82(4), 7–12.
86.
Woodring, P. (1989). A new approach to the dropout problem. Phi Delta Kappan, 70, 468–469.
