Mainstream Consultation in Secondary Settings

Abstract

The delivery of special education to secondary school students has posed problems for educators. These services typically are provided in set-aside programs, that is, in environments outside regular education classrooms, with students most frequently receiving either basic skills instruction or tutoring in secondary school content areas. Few benefits have been associated with either approach, however. Recently, an alternative approach was developed and field tested in Pine County. Teachers used Mainstream Consultation Agreements (MCA), which emphasized a team approach to address students' problems. The model incorporates data based program modification in which students determined eligible for special education services are provided with MCAs through their content area teachers. This study describes the MCA system and provides outcome data regarding its effectiveness, using students as their own control. Data reported after one year of implementation indicate that students taking academic courses in content areas with MCAs performed much as they did in academic courses without MCAs. This finding is interpreted as supportive of the model. Implications of this system for facilitating teaming with regular educators are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alpert, J. , Weiner, L.B. , & Ludwig, L.M. (1979). Evaluation of outcome in school consultation. Journal of School Psychology, 17(4), 333–338.

Bennett, R.E. (1982). Cautions for the use of informal measures in the educational assessment of exceptional children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 15(6), 337–339.

Bergan, J. (1977). Behavioral consultation. Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.

Dickinson, D.J. , & Adcox, S. (1984). Program evaluation of a school consultation program. Psychology in the Schools, 21, 336–342.

Germann, G. (1986). The Pine County total special education system: Mainstream consultation. Sandstone, MN: Pine County Special Education Cooperative.

Germann, G. , & Tindal, G. (1985). An application of curriculum-based assessment: The use of direct and repeated measurement. Exceptional Children, 52, 244–265.

Hagerty, G.J. , & Abramson, M. (1987). Impediments to implementing national policy change for mildly handicapped students. Exceptional Children, 53, 315–324.

Idol, L. , Paolucci-Whitcomb, P. , & Nevin, A. (1986). Collaborative consultation. Rockville, MD: Aspen Systems.

Idol-Maestas, L. (1983). Special educator's consultation handbook. Rockville, MD: Aspen Systems.

10.

Jason, L.A. , Ferone, L. & Anderegg, T. (1979). Evaluating ecological, behavioral, and process consultation interventions. Journal of School Psychology, 17(2), 103–115.

11.

Kazdin, A.E. (1982). Single-case study experimental designs: Strategies for studying behavior change. New York: Pergamon Press.

12.

Mannino, F.V. & Shore, M.F. (1975). The effects of consultation: A review of empirical studies. American Journal of Community Psychology, 3(1), 1–21.

13.

Medway, F.J. (1979). How effective is school consultation?: A review of recent research. Journal of School Psychology, 17(3), 175–282.

14.

Miller, T.L. , & Sabatino, D.A. (1978). An evaluation of the teacher consultant model as an approach to mainstreaming. Exceptional Children, 45(2), 86–91.

15.

Reynolds, M.C. , Wang, M.C. , & Walberg, H.J. (1987). The necessary restructuring of special and regular education. Exceptional Children, 53, 391–398.

16.

White, G.W. & Pryzwansky, W.B. (1982). Consultation outcomes as a result of inservice resource training. Psychology in the Schools, 19(4), 495–502.

17.

Will, M. (1986). Educating students with learning problems---A shared responsibility. Washington. DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services.

18.

Zigmond, N. , & Sansone, J. (1986). Designing a program for the learning disabled adolescent. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 13–17.