Abstract
Recent advances in microelectronics and computer software have rekindled enthusiasm for applications of computer-assisted instruction (CAI). The more salient features of CAI are highly compatible with the major instructional and curricular principles recommended for learning-disabled children. To assess the relative effectiveness of computerized over conventional remedial methods with handicapped learners, 205 learning-disabled first- through sixth-grade children were assigned to either a mathematics CAI or spelling CAI treatment group or to a conventional-instruction control group. After 1 school year, posttest achievement indices were gathered through individually administered and group-administered standardized tests. Posttest performance was covaried for initial group differences in pretest achievement, IQ, and time in remedial instruction. Separate repeated-measures analyses for individually assessed and group-assessed achievement indicated that gains for the 3 groups were essentially equivalent. It was found that certain popular achievement measures may be insensitive to achievement gains in the learning disabled.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
