The authors review recent literature regarding the effectiveness of the Bender Visual-Motor Gestalt Test in screening for brain damage in school-aged children of normal intelligence who display learning problems. Problems with research of this type and various administrations and scoring methods are discussed. All methods reviewed significantly discriminate between groups of brain-damaged and unimpaired children. No method, however, provides successful predictive rates high enough to warrant the use of the Bender as the sole diagnostic instrument in individual cases.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ackerman, P.T., Peters, J.E., & Dykman, R.A.Children with specific learning disabilities : Bender Gestalt Test findings and other signs. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 1971, 4, 437-446.
2.
Adams, J., Kenny, T.J., & Canter, A.The efficacy of the Canter Background Interference Procedure in identifying children with cerebral dysfunctions. Journal of Clinical and Consulting Psychology, 1973, 40, 489.
3.
Bender, L.A visual motor gestalt test and its clinical use (Research Monograph No. 3) . New York: American Orthopsychiatric Association, 1938.
4.
Bender, L.Use of the Visual Motor Gestalt Test in the diagnosis of learning disabilities . Journal of Special Education, 1970, 4, 29-39.
5.
Canter, A.A Background Interference Procedure to increase sensitivity of the Bender Gestalt Test to organic brain disorder. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1966, 30, 91-97.
6.
Canter, A.Background Interference Procedure Bender Test for the detection of organic brain disorder: Modified scoring method and replication. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1968, 32, 522-526.
7.
Fidel, E., & Ray, J.The validity of the Revised Objective Perceptual Test in differentiating among non-organic, minimally organic, and grossly organic children. Journal of Special Education, 1975, 6, 279-284.
8.
Friedman, J., Strochak, R.D., Gitlin, S., & Gottsagen, M.L.Koppitz Bender scoring system and brain injury in children. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1967, 23, 179-182.
9.
Kenny, T.J.Background Interference Procedure: A means of assessing neurologic dysfunction in school-age children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1971, 37, 44-46.
10.
Koppitz, E.M.Diagnosing brain damage in young children with the Bender Gestalt Test. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1962 ,26, 541-546.
11.
Koppitz E.M.The Bender Gestalt Test for young children. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1964 .
12.
Koppitz, E.M.Brain damage, reading disability and the Bender Gestalt Test. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1970, 3, 429-433.
13.
Mallinger, B.L.Background Interference Procedure and discriminant function analysis in predicting clinically determined categories of learning disability. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1977, 44, 767-776.
14.
McConnell, O.Koppitz's brain damage scores in relation to organicity and emotional problems in children. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1967, 23, 370-374.
15.
Olive, R., & Kronenberger, E.Testing the applicability of Koppitz Bender Gestalt scores to brain damaged, emotionally disturbed and normal adolescents . Psychology in the Schools, 1971, 8, 250-252.
16.
Paine, R.S., & Oppe, T.E.Neurological examination of children. London, England: W. Heinemann Medical Books, 1966.
17.
Parsons, L.B., McLeroy, N., & Wright, L.Validity of Koppitz's developmental score as a measure of organicity . Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1971, 33, 1013-1014.
18.
Reed, H.The use of psychological tests in diagnosing brain damage in school children . In H. C. Haywood (Ed.). Brain damage in school age children. Washington, D.C.: National Education Association, 1968.
19.
Reitan, R.M.Methodological problems in clinical neuropsychology. In R. M. Reitan & L. A. Davison (Ed.), Clinical neuropsychology: Current status and applications. Washington, D. C.: Winston, 1974.
20.
Ross, O.A.Conceptual issues in the evaluation of brain damage. In J. L. Khanna (Ed.), Brain damage in mental retardation. Springfield, III.: Thomas, 1968.
21.
Saunders, T.R.Toward a distinctive role for the psychologist in neurological decision making . Professional Psychology, 1975, 6, 161-166.
22.
Stavrianos, B.K.A Bit of communication for Wagner and some answers to Murdock's questions . Journal of Projective Techniques and Personality Assessment , 1970, 33, 87.
23.
Tolor, A., & Schulberg, H.C.An evaluation of the Bender Gestalt Test. Springfield, III.: Thomas, 1963.
24.
Wagner, E.E., & Murray, A.Y.Bender Gestalts of organic children: Accuracy of clinical judgments . Journal of Projective Techniques and Personality Assessment , 1969, 33, 240-242.
25.
Welcher, D., Wessel, K., Mellits, E.D., & Hardy, J.The Bender Gestalt Test as an indication of neurological impairment in inner city children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1974, 38, 899-910.
26.
Yates, A.J.The value of some psychological tests of brain damage. In W. L. Smith & M. J. Phillipus (Eds.), Neuro-psychological testing in organic brain dysfunction. Springfield, III.: Thomas, 1969.
