Tests used to estimate mental abilities are critically examined. Three weaknesses in mental measurement are identified that may inhibit the test performance of low-achieving adolescents, and modifications are suggested to correct these weaknesses. The modifications are derived from a developmentally based information-processing theory.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bacheleder, B.L., & Denney, M.R.A theory of intelligence: I. Span and the complexity of stimulus control. Intelligence, 1977, a, 127-150. (a)
2.
Bacheleder, B.L., & Denney, M.R.A theory of intelligence: II. The role of span in a variety of intellectual tasks. Intelligence, 1977, 1 , 237-256. (b)
3.
Bachor, D.G.Information processing capacity and teachability of low achieving students . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto , 1976.
4.
Bachor, D.G.Using work samples as H diagnostic information. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 1979, 2, 45-52.
5.
Bereiter, C.IQ and elitism. Interchange, 1976-77, 7, 36-44. Je
Bruner, J.S.Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University M Press, 1966.
8.
Case, R.Information processing, social class and instruction: A developmental investigation . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto , 1970.
9.
Case, R.Structures and strictures: Some functional limitations on the course of cognitive growth. Cognitive Psychology, 1974, 18, 382-397.
10.
Case, R.Piaget and beyond: Towards a developmentally based technology of instruction . In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (Vol. 1). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1978.
11.
Charlesworth, W.R.Human intelligence as adaptation: An ethological approach. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence . New York: Wiley, 1976.
12.
Cranton, P.A.An introduction to criterion-referenced measurement. Canadian Journal of Education, 1976, 1, 83-92.
13.
Cronbach, L.J., & Snow, R.E.Final report: Individual differences in learning ability as a function of instructional variables. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University, 1969.
14.
Cronbach, L.J., & Snow, R.E.Aptitudes and instructional methods. New York: Wiley, 1977.
15.
Estes, W.K.Learning theory and mental development. New York: Academic, 1970.
16.
Estes, W.K.Intelligence and cognitive psychology. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence. New York: Wiley, 1976.
17.
Feuerstein, R.Studies of cognitive modifiability (Vol. 1. The dynamic assessment of retarded performance. Jerusalem: Hadassah-Wizo-Canada Research Institute, 1972.
18.
lively, W., Patterson, H., & Page, S.A.A "universe defined" system of arithmetic achievement tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1968, 5 , 275-290.
19.
encks, C., Smith, M., Acland, H., Bane, M.J.Cohen, D., Gintis, H., Heyns, B., & Michelson, S.Inequality: A reassessment of the effects of family and schooling in America . New York: Basic Books, 1972. Mackay, G.W.S., & Vernon , P.E.The measurement of learning ability. British Journal of Educational Psychology , 1963, 33, 177-186.
20.
Millman, J.Criterion-referenced measurement. In W.J. Popham (Ed.), Evaluation in education. Berkeley: McCutchan, 1974.
21.
Narrol, H., & Bachor, D.G.An introduction to Feuerstein's approach to assessing and developing cognitive potential. Interchange, 1975, 6, 1-16.
22.
Nicholls, J.G.Some effects of testing procedure on divergent thinking. Child Development, 1971, 42, 1647-1651.
23.
Parkinson, G.The limits of learning: A quantitative developmental investigation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, York University, 1975.
24.
Pascual-Leone, J.Cognitive development and cognitive style: A general psychological integration . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Geneva , 1969.
25.
Pascual-Leone, J.A mathematical model for the transition rule in Piaget's developmental stages . Acta Psychologica, 1970, 63,301-345.
26.
Pascual-Leone, J.A view of cognition from a formalist's perspective, in R. F. Riegel & J. Meacham (Eds.), The developing individual in a changing world. The Hague : Mouton, 1976.
27.
Pascual-Leone, J., Goodman, D., Annon, P., & Subelman, J.Piagetian theory and neo-Piagetian analysis as psychological guides in education . In J. M. Gallagher & J. Easley (Eds.), Knowledge and development (Vol. 2). Piaget and education, in press.
28.
Piaget, J.Problems of equilibration. In C. F. Nodine , J. M. Gallagher, & R. D. Humphreys (Eds.) Piaget and Inhelder on equilibration. Philadelphia: The Jean Piaget Society. 1971.
29.
Scandura, J.M.Structural approach to instructional problems. American Psychologist , 1977, 32, 33-53.
30.
Stenhouse, D.Evolutionary, adaptive, and ethological considerations in the assessment of intelligence. Interchange, 1976-77,7, 51-61.
31.
Tilton, J.W.Intelligence test scores as indicative of ability to learn. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1949, 9, 291-296.
32.
Vernon, P.E.The validity of divergent thinking tests. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 1972, 18, 249-258.
33.
Voss, J.F.The nature of "the nature of intelligence." In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence. New York: Wiley, 1976.
34.
Wallach, M.A., & Kogan, N.Modes of thinking in young children and a study of the creativity and intelligence distinction. New York: Holt, 1965.
35.
Woodrow, H.Intelligence and improvement in school subjects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1945,36, 155-166.
36.
Klahr, D.Information processing models of cognitive development: Potential relevance to science instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Americal Educational Research Association, Toronto, Ontario, March 1978.
