Regular-Classroom Teachers' Attributions and Instructional Prescriptions for Handicapped and Nonhandicapped Pupils

Abstract

The study examined regular-classroom teachers' attributions and instructional prescriptions for normal achieving (NA), educationally handicapped (EH), and educable mentally retarded (EMR) pupils. Teachers were provided an experimental packet containing simulated background and current achievement information on an NA, EH, or EMR pupil. Background descriptive information reflecting an NA, EH, or EMR pupil affected teachers' failure but not success attributions as well as the manner in which they revised their failure-attribution ratings. In addition, it was found that teachers' initial instructional prescriptions were anchored by descriptive information reflecting characteristics of NA, EH, and EMR pupils. However, as teachers continued to receive current achievement information their instructional decisions appeared to be more weighted on pupils' current performance and less on achievement history. Findings are discussed in light of attributional research and current federal legislation mandating education of handicapped pupils in regular-education settings to the maximum extent possible.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Braun, C. Teacher expectation: Socio-psychological dynamics. Review of Educational Research, 1976, 46, 185-213.

Brophy, J.E. , & Good, T.L. Teachers-student relationship: Causes and consequences. New York: Holt, 1974.

Frieze, E. , & Weiner, B. Cue utilization and attributional judgments for success and failure. Journal of Personality, 1971, 29, 591-606.

Hewett, F. Education of exceptional learners (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1977.

Kaufman, M.J. , Gottlieb, J. , Agard, J.A. , & Kukic, M.B. Mainstreaming: Toward an explication of the construct. In E. L. Meyers , G. A. Vergason , R. J. Whelan , (Eds.), Alternatives for teaching exceptional children. Denver : Love Publishing, 1975.

Kelley, H.H. Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (Vol.15). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1967.

Keogh, B.K. , Becker, L.D. , Kukic, M.B. , & Kukic, S.J. Programs for educationally handicapped and educable mentally retarded pupils: Review and recommendations (Technical Report SERP). Graduate School of Education, UCLA, 1972.

Lanzetta, J.T. , & Hannah, T.E. Reinforcing behavior of "naive" trainers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1969, 11, 245-252.

MacMillan, D.L. , Jones, R.L. , & Meyers, C.E. Mainstreaming the mildly retarded: Some questions, cautions and guidelines . Mental Retardation, 1976, 14, 3-10.

10.

Rubovits, P. , & Maehr, M. Pygmalion analyzed: Toward an explanation of the Rosenthal-Jacobson findings . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1971, 19, 197-203.

11.

Tversky, A. , & Kahneman, D. Judgments under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science , 1974, 184, 1124-1131.

12.

Weiner, B. Theories of motivation from mechanism to cognition. Chicago : Markham, 1972.

13.

Weiner, B. Achievement motivation and attribution theory. Morristown, N.J.: General Learning Press, 1974 .

14.

Weiner, B. , & Kukla, A. An attributional analysis of achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1970, 15, 1-20.

15.

West, C.K. , & Anderson, T.H. The question of preponderant causation in teacher expectancy research. Review of Educational Research, 1976, 46, 613-630.

16.

Rosenbaum, R.M. A dimensional analysis of the perceived causes of success and failure. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA, 1972.

17.

Skilbeck, W.M. Effects of participant involvement on expectational influence: An investigation of experimenter bias. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA, 1975.