Seven independent studies of young children's performances were reviewed. Rather consistently, children's scores on a wide range of popular language tests and measures revealed large numbers of moderately high to high interrelationships which were unexpected, since the authors frequently claimed that their tests measured specific rather than general language skills. Data from two new investigations of different batteries of language tests given to 122 young handicapped children in the first investigation and 44 in the second were subjected to multivariate analyses, including regression analysis and factor analysis.
Results from the first study showed that a few general rather than many specific linguistic abilities characterized the performances of the children; results from the second showed that only one general linguistic factor accounted for the subjects' performances. The construct and content validity of many of the tests studied appears untenable. Implications for use of the tests (accounting for most of the variance in each of the two batteries studied) are presented, along with recommendations concerning the development of more valid language tests.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aram, D., & Nation, J.Patterns of language behavior in children with developmental language disorders. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1975, 18, 229–241.
2.
Carrow, E.Test for Auditory Comprehension of Language. Austin, Texas: Learning Concepts, 1973.
3.
Cattell, R., & Cattell, M.Handbook for the Jr.-Sr. High School Personality Questionnaire. Champaign, Ill.: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing, 1969.
4.
DeRenzi, E., & Vignolo, L.The Token Test: A sensitive test to detect receptive disturbances in aphasics. Brain, 1961, 85, 565–578.
5.
Dukes, P.An exploratory study of the comparative effectiveness of two language intervention programs in teaching normal and language deviant preschool children. (Doctoral dissertation, Kent State University, 1974; University Microfilms No. 75–07086.)
6.
Dunn, L.Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test. Circle Pines, Minn.: American Guidance Service, Inc., 1965.
7.
Ferguson, G.Statistical analysis in psychology & education. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1976.
8.
Fisher, H., & Logeman, J.The Fisher-Logeman Test of Articulation Competence. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin, 1971.
9.
Foster, R., Giddan, J., & Stark, J.Assessment of children's language comprehension. Palo Alto, Calif.: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1973.
10.
Goldman, R., & Fristoe, M.Goldman-Fristoe Test of Articulation. Circle Pines, Minn.: American Guidance Service, 1969. (a)
11.
Goldman, R., & Fristoe, M.Goldman-Fristoe Test of Auditory Discrimination. Circle Pines, Minn.: American Guidance Service, 1969. (b)
12.
Hammill, D., & Irwin, O.Peabody Vocabulary Test as a measure of intelligence for mentally subnormal children. Training School Bulletin, 1965, 62, 126–131
13.
Haring, N., & Ridgway, R.Early identification of children with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children, 1967, 33, 387–395.
14.
Jackson, P., & Sommers, R.An investigation of the language performance of children with normal articulation, mild, moderate or severe articulation deficiency and those having minimal brain dysfunction. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Speech and Hearing Association, New York, November 1972.
15.
Kaufmann, H., & Ivanoff, J.Evaluating the mentally retarded with the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1968, 73, 396–398.
16.
Kirk, S., & Kirk, W.Uses and abuses of the ITPA. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 1978, 43, 58–76.
17.
Kirk, S., McCarthy, J., & Kirk, W.The Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic Abilities. Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois, 1968.
18.
Landan, S.An investigation involving the linguistic performance of loquacious and taciturn children. Unpublished master's thesis, Kent State University, 1975.
19.
Lass, N., & Golden, S.A comparative study of children's performance on three tests for receptive language abilities, Journal of Auditory Research, 1975, 15, 117–182.
Lowry, J. A test of the regression hypothesis: Receptive-expressive language performances of adult aphasics and children. (Doctoral dissertation, Kent State University, 1973; University Microfilms No. 74–15070.)
24.
McCarthy, D.The language development of the preschool child. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1930.
25.
McDonald, E.The Deep Test of Articulation. Pittsburgh: Stanwix House, 1968.
26.
Menyuk, P.Sentences children use. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1969.
27.
Mittler, P., & Ward, J.The use of the ITPA on British 4-year-old children: A normative and factorial study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1970, 40, 43–54.
28.
Perkins, W.Speech pathology: An applied behavioral science. Saint Louis: C. V. Mosby, 1971.
29.
Pronovost, W.Boston University Speech Sound Discrimination Test. Cedar Falls, Iowa: Go-Go Productions, 1974.
30.
Roberts, P.English syntax. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1964.
31.
Ruder, K.A psycholinguistic viewpoint of the language acquisition process. In R. Schiefelbush (Ed.), Language of the mentally retarded. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1972.
32.
Ryckman, D., & Wiegerink, R.The factors of the ITPA: A comparison of 18 factor analyses. Exceptional Children, 1969, 36, 107–113.
33.
Shotwell, A., O'Conner, G., Gabet, Y., & Dingman, H.Relation of the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test I.Q. to the Stanford-Binet I.Q. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1969, 74, 39–42.
34.
Silverstein, A.Variance components in the Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic Abilities. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1967, 24, 1315–1316.
35.
Sinclair-de Zwort. Language acquisition and cognitive development. In T. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language. New York: Academic Press, 1973.
36.
Smith, F., & Miller, G.The genesis of language: A psycholinguistic approach. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1966.
37.
Solberg, K.Linguistic theory and information processing. In D. Massario (Ed.), Understanding language: An information processing analysis of speech perception, reading, and psycholinguistics. New York: Academic Press, 1973.
38.
Templin, M.Templin Picture Sound Discrimination Test. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1957.
39.
Weener, P., Barritt, L., & Semmel, M.A critical evaluation of the ITPA. Exceptional Children, 1967, 33, 373–384.
40.
Williams, A., Marks, C., & Bialer, I.Validity of the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test as a measure of hearing vocabulary in mentally retarded and normal children. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 1977, 20, 205–211.
41.
Wisland, M., & Many, W.A factorial study of the ITPA with children having above average intelligence. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1969, 29, 367–376.
42.
Zimmerman, I., Steiner, V., & Evatt, R.Preschool Language Scale. Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrill, 1969.
