Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C.Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1966.
2.
Cochran, W. G.Analysis of covariance: Its nature and uses. Biometrics, 1957, 13, 261–281.
3.
Cotton, E.Improvement in motor function with the use of conductive education. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 1974, 16, 637–643.
4.
Elashoff, J. D.Analysis of covariance: A delicate instrument. American Educational Research Journal, 1969, 6, 383–401.
5.
Hari, M., & Akos, K.Konductiv Pedagogia. Budapest, Hungary: Tankonyvkiado, 1971.
6.
Heal, L. W.Evaluating an integrated approach to the management of cerebral palsy. Final report for Grant #OEG-0–9–592149–4540 (032), Bureau of Education for the Handicapped, U. S. Office of Education, Department of Health, Education and Welfare, 1972.
7.
Hopkins, K. D.Regression and the matching fallacy in quasi-experimental research. Journal of Special Education, 1969, 3, 329–336.
8.
Lord, F. M.Elementary models for measuring change. In C. W. Harris (Ed.), Problems in measuring change. Madison, Wisc.: University of Wisconsin Press, 1963.
9.
Lord, F. M.A paradox in the interpretation of group comparisons. Psychological Bulletin, 1967, 68, 304–305.
10.
Stanley, J. C.Problems in equating groups in mental retardation research. Journal of Special Education, 1967, 1, 241–256.
11.
Werts, C. E., & Linn, R. L.Lord's paradox: A generic problem. Psychological Bulletin, 1969, 72, 423–425.
12.
Werts, C. E., & Linn, R. L.A general linear model for studying growth. Psychological Bulletin, 1970, 73, 17–22.
13.
Winer, B. J.Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962.
