Arampatta, D.Illustrations in social studies textbooks as they affect the visually handicapped. Unpublished specialist in education thesis. George Peabody College for Teachers, 1970.
2.
Berlá, E. P.Behavioral strategies and problems in scanning and interpreting tactual displays. The New Outlook for the Blind, 1972, 66, 272–286.
3.
Berlá, E. P.Strategies in scanning a tactual pseudomap. Education of the Visually Handicapped.1973, 5, 8–19.
4.
Berláa, E. P., & Murr, M. J.Searching tactual space. Education of the Visually Handicapped, 1974. 6, 49–58.
5.
Foulke, E.Transfer of a complex perceptual skill. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 1964. 18, 733–740.
6.
Franks, F. L. & Nolan, C. Y.Development of geographical concepts in blind children. Education of the Visually Handicapped, 1970, 2, 1–8.
7.
Franks, F. L. & Nolan, C. Y.Measuring geographical concept attainment in visually handicapped students. Education of the Visually Handicapped, 1971, 3, 11–17.
8.
Hill, J. W.Limited field of view in reading lettershapes with the fingers. In F. Geldard (Ed.), Cutaneous communication systems and devices.Austin. Tex.: Psychonomic Society, 1973.
9.
Lappin, J. S., & Foulke, E.Expanding the tactual field of view. Perception & Psychophysics, 1973, 14, 237–241.
10.
Nolan, C. Y., & Morris, J. E.Improvement of tactual symbols for blind children: Final report.Louisville, Ken.: American Printing House for the Blind, 1971. (Project No. 5–0421: Grant No. OEG-32–27-0000–1012)