BatemanB.The efficacy of an auditory and a visual method of first grade reading instruction with auditory and visual learners. In SmithH. K. (Ed.), Perception and reading.Newark, Del.: International Reading Association, 1968.
2.
BrachtG. H.Experimental factors related to aptitude–treatment interaction. Review of Educational Research, 1970; 40, 385–370.
3.
BucknerD. N.HarabedianA., & McGrathJ. J.Individual differences in vigilance performance. Journal of Engineering Psychology.Santa Barbara, Calif.: Human Factors Research, Inc., 19654(3), 69–85.
4.
CromerW.The difference model: A new explanation for some reading difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1970; 61, 471–483.
5.
CronbachL. J.How can instruction be adapted to individual differences? In GagneR. M. (Ed.), Learning and individual differences.Columbus, Ohio: Merrill, 1967.
6.
GageN. L., & UnruchW. R.Theoretical formulations for research on teaching. Review of Educational Research, 1967; 37, 358–370.
7.
GhatalaE. S.Memory attributes: Some directions for further research and implications for education. Theoretical paper from the Wisconsin Research and Development Center for Cognitive Learning. The University of Wisconsin, 1970; No. 27.
8.
JansenD. R.Effects of visual and auditory perceptual aptitudes and letter discrimination pretraining on word recognition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, 1971.
9.
MannL.ProgerB., & CrossL. H.Aptitude–treatment interactions with handicapped children: A focus on the measurement of the aptitude component. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Meeting, New Orleans, February 25–March 1, 1973. (ERIC 075 510).
10.
MateR., & RohwerW. D.Jr.Visual elaboration of text. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, March, 1971.
11.
NelsonJ. B.The effect of visual–auditory modality preference on learning mode preference in first-grade children. Unpublished dissertation, University of Pittsburgh, 1970.
12.
OakanR.WeinerM., & CromerW.Identification, organization and reading comprehension for good and poor readers. Journal of Education Psychology, 1971; 62, 71–78.
13.
PopeL. T., & McKechnieD. F.Correlation between visual and auditory vigilance performance. USAF Aerospace Medical Research Laboratories Technical Documentary Report, 1963.
14.
SabatinoD. A., & YsseldykeJ. E.An evaluation of diagnostic–prescriptive teaching with handicapped children.Mimeograph, Pennsylvania State University, 1972.
15.
SabatinoD. A.YsseldykeJ. E., & WoolstonJ.Diagnostic–prescriptive teaching utilizing perceptual strengths of mentally retarded children. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1973; 78(7), 14.
16.
StreissguthW. O.Effects of visual discrimination training on reading. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, 1970.