BakerF.Numerical taxonomy for educational researchers. Review of Educational Research, 1972; 42(3), 345–358.
2.
BerlinerD. S., & CahenL. S.Trait–treatment interaction and learning. In KerlingerF. N. (Ed.), Review of research in education: I.Itasca. III.: F. E. Peacock, 1973.
3.
BlalockH. M.Jr.Causal inferences in non-experimental research.Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, 1964.
4.
BrachtG. H.Experimental factors related to aptitude–treatment interaction. Review of Educational Research, 1970; 40, 627–645.
5.
CampbellD. T.From description to experimentation: Interpreting trends as quasi-experiments. In HarrisC. W. (Ed.), Problems in measuring change.Madison, Wis.: University of Wisconsin, 1963.
6.
CampbellD. T.Time-series of annual same-grade testings in the evaluation of compensatory educational experiments. Unpublished manuscript, 1970.
7.
CampbellD. T.Temporal changes in treatment–effect correlations: A quasi-experimental model for institutional records and longitudinal studies. In GlassG. V. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1970 Invitational Conference on Testing Problems.Princeton, N. J.: Educational Testing Service, 1971.
8.
CampbellD. T., & ClaytonK. N.Avoiding regression effects in panel studies on communication impact. Studies in Public Communications, 1961; 3, 99–118.
9.
CarlosS.Analysis of causal models. Interchange, 1970; 1(3), 21–29.
10.
ClementsS. D.Minimal brain dysfunction in children: Terminology and identification: Phase one of a three-phase project.Washington, D. C.: U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Public Health Service Publication No. 1445, 1966.
11.
DuncanO. D.Path analysis: Sociological examples. American Journal of Sociology.1966; 72 (1), 1–16.
12.
ElkinsJ.Numerical taxonomy in educational research: A review and an example. Unpublished manuscript., 1973.
13.
GarrisonM., & HammillD. D.Who are the retarded?Exceptional Children.1971; 38 (1), 13–20.
14.
GoodmanD., & HammillD. D.The effectiveness of the Kephart–Getman activities in developing perceptual–motor and cognitive skills. Focus on Exceptional Children, 1973; 4(9), 1–9.
HammillD. D.GoodmanL., & WiederholtJ. L.Visual–motor processes: Can we train them?Reading Teacher, 1974; 27, 469–478.
17.
HammillD. D., & LarsenS. C.The effectiveness of psycholinguistic training. Exceptional Children, 1974; 41, 5–14. (a)
18.
HammillD. D., & LarsenS. C.The relationship of selected auditory perceptual skills and reading ability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1974; 7, 429–435. (b)
19.
HammillD. D.LarsenS. C.ParkerR.BagleyM., & SanfordH.Perceptual and conceptual correlations of reading. Unpublished manuscript, 1974.
20.
HammillD. D., & WiederholtJ. L.Review of the Frostig Visual Perception Test and the related training program. In MannL., and SabatinoD. (Eds.). First review of special education.Philadelphia: JSE Press, 1973.
21.
KassC. E., & MyklebustH. R.Learning disability: An educational definition. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1969; 2, 38–40.
22.
LarsenS. C., & HammillD. D.The relationship of selected visual-perceptual abilities to school learning. Journal of Special Education, 1975; 9, 281–291.
23.
McCarthyJ. McR.A public school program of remediation for children with specific learning disabilities. Final Report, Project No. 6-2003, Grant No. OEG-36-062003-1583. Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Office of Education, Bureau of Educationally Handicapped. (Published also as a Preview Series.Tucson: Leadership Training Institute in Learning Disabilities, University of Arizona), October1973.
24.
National Advisory Committee on Handicapped Children.Special education for handicapped children.First annual report. Washington, D.C.: Office of Education, HEW, 1968.
25.
NewcomerP. L., & GoodmanL.Effect of modality of instruction on the learning of meaningful and nonmeaningful material by auditory and visual learners. Journal of Special Education, 1975; 9, 261–268.
26.
NolleD. B.Statistical innovations and causal models. Interchange, 1970; 1(3), 35–41.
RossH. L.CampbellD. T., & GlassG. V.Determining the social effects of a legal reform: The British “Breathalyser” crackdown of 1967. American Behavioral Scientist, 1970; 13(4), 433–509.
29.
RozelleR. M., & CampbellD. T.More plausible rival hypotheses in the cross-lagged panel correlation technique. Psychological Bulletin, 1969; 71(1), 74–80.
30.
SalomonG.Heuristic models for the generation of aptitude–treatment interaction hypotheses. Review of Educational Research, 1972; 42(3), 327–343.
31.
SenfG. M.Future research needs in learning disabilities. Paper presented at the Texas Tech Invitational Conference on the Learning Disabilities Minimal Brain Dysfunction Syndrome: Research perspective and applications. October 1973. (Published as a Preview Series, Tucson: Leadership Training Institute in Learning Disabilities, University of Arizona, 1973).
32.
SenfG. M.Issues surrounding classification in learning disabilities. Paper presentation at the Annual Meeting of the Association for Children with Learning Disabilities. Houston, 1974.
33.
WiederholtJ. L.Historical perspectives on the education of the learning disabled. In MannL., and SabatinoD. (Eds.), Second review of special education, Philadelphia: JSE Press, 1974.
34.
YeeA. H., & GageN. L.Techniques for estimating the source and direction of causal influence in panel data. Psychological Bulletin, 1968; 70, 116–26.
35.
YsseldykeJ. E.Diagnostic–perscriptive teaching: The search for aptitude-treatment interactions. In MannL., and SabatinoD. (Eds.), First review of special education, Philadelphia: JSE, 1973.