ApplebeeA. N.Research in reading retardation: Two critical problems. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1971; 12, 91–113.
2.
AverchH. A.CarrollS. J.DonaldsonT. S.KieslingH. J., & PincusJ.How effective is schooling?Santa Monica, Calif.: The Rand Corporation, 1972.
3.
BerkeleyG. F.Queensland provision for children with learning disabilities: Performance and promise. In ElkinsJ. (Ed.), The identification and treatment of children with learning disabilities.St. Lucia: University of Queensland, 1973.
4.
BerlinerD. C., & CahenL. S.Trait-treatment interaction and learning. In KerlingerJ. N. (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 1). Itasca, III.: F. E. Peacock, 1973.
5.
BiggsJ. B.Content to process. Australian Journal of Education, 1973; 17, 275–238.
6.
BloomB. S.HastingsJ. T., & MadausG. F.Handbook of formative and summative evaluation of student learning.New York: McGraw-Hill, 1971.
7.
CohenS. A.Studies in visual perception and reading in disadvantaged children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1970; 1, 498–507.
8.
CohenS. A.Dyspedagogia as a cause of reading retardation: Definition and treatment. In BatemanB. (Ed.), Learning disorders: Readings (Vol. 4). Seattle: Special Child Publications, 1971.
9.
CronbachL. J.The two disciplines of scientific psychology. The American Psychologist, 1957; 12, 671–684.
10.
De La CruzF. F.FoxB. H., & RobertsR. H. (Eds.). Minimal brain dysfunction. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1973; 208.
11.
ElkinsJ.Some psycholinguistic aspects of the differential diagnosis of reading disability in grades I and II Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Queensland, 1972.
12.
ElkinsJ.The status of learning disabilities. Paper presented at the International Conference of the Association for Children with Learning Disabilities, Houston, March 1974.
13.
HaringN. G.Attending and responding.Belmont, Calif.: Fearon, 1968.
14.
HopkinsK. D.Preventing the number one misinterpretation of behavioral research, or how to increase statistical power. Journal of Special education, 1973; 7, 103–107.
15.
KarmelP.Schools in Australia.Report of the Interim Committee for the Australian Schools Commission. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service, 1973.
16.
KuhnT. S.The structure of scientific revolutions.Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.
17.
LightR. J., & SmithP. V.Accumulating evidence: Procedures for resolving contradictions among different research studies. Harvard Educational Review, 1971; 41, 429–471.
18.
LillyM. S., & KelleherJ.Modality strengths and aptitude–treatment interaction. Journal of Special Education, 1973; 7, 5–13.
McCarthyJ. M.A public school program of remediation for children with specific learning disabilities. Final Report, Project No. G-2003. Grant No. OEG-3-6-062003-1583, 1973.
23.
McNeillD.The acquisition of language.New York: Harper and Row, 1970.
QuayH. C., & PetersonD. R.Manual for the behavior problem checklist.Champaign, III.: Children's Research Center, University of Illinois, 1967.
26.
SlobinD. I.The more it changes … on understanding language by watching it move through time. Papers and Reports on Child Language Development, 1975; 10, 1–30.
27.
SmithD. E. P., & CarriganP. M.The nature of reading disability.New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1959.
28.
WienerM., & CromerW.Reading and reading difficulty: A conceptual analysis. Harvard Educational Review, 1967; 37, 620–643.
29.
YsseldykeJ. E.Diagnostic–prescriptive teaching: The search for aptitude treatment interactions. In MannL., & SabatinoD. (Eds.), The first review of special education (2 vols). Philadelphia: JSE Press, 1973.