AbesonA., & WeintraubF. J.State law for the handicapped—essential ingredients. Unpublished manuscript, Council for Exceptional Children, Lake Arrowhead, Calif., 1971.
2.
AlbeeG. W.The evaluation, Judgment, and placement process. Paper presented at the conference sponsored by the President's Committee on Mental Retardation, the Bureau of Education for the Handicapped, and the Council for Exceptional Children, Lake Arrowhead, Calif., March, 1971.
3.
Arreola v. Board of Education(Orange County, Cal.), No. 160 577 (1968). (Exceptional Children, 1971; 38, No. 1).
4.
BolmeierE. C.Legal limits of authority over the pupil.Charlottesville, Va.: Michie, 1970.
5.
Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954). Cited by A. T. Mason & W. M. Beaney, American constitutional law.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1968.
6.
BurgenerC. W. California Code ch. 78 (1971) amending Cal. Educ. Code 6902 (1970).
7.
CollinsE. R.Statutory review.Report. Tallahassee, Fla.: Education for Exceptional Children Section, Florida Department of Education, 1971.
8.
Covarrubias v. San Diego Unified School District(Southern Cal.), No. 70-394-T (S. D. Cal. 1971). (Exceptional Children, 1971; 38, No. 1).
9.
CrossB.Justice and protection for retarded children and youth. Peabody Journal of Education, 1971; 48, 208–211.
10.
Department of Public Welfare v. Haas (III.), 154 N.E. 2d 265 (1958). (Peabody Journal of Education, 1971; 48, No. 3).
11.
Diana v. State Board of Education, No. C-70 37 RFP, District Court for Northern California (February, 1970). (Exceptional Children, 1971; 38, No. 1).
12.
DimondP. R.The law of school classification. Inequality in Education, 1972; No. 12.
13.
Elgin v. Silver (N.Y.), 182 N.Y. S. 2d 669 (Sup. Ct. 1958). Cited by E. R. Collins, op. cit.
14.
Guadalupe Organization v. Tempe Elementary School District No. 3 (Ariz.), No. 71–435 (D. Ariz. 1971). (Inequality in Education, 1972; No. 12).
In re Gault, 387, U.S. 1 (1967). Cited by F. J. Weintraub, op. cit.
19.
In re Petty (Iowa), 41 N. W. 2d 672 (1950). Cited by F. J. Weintraub, op. cit.
20.
FrandsenIverson v. (Idaho), 237 F. 2d 898 (10th Cir., 1956). Cited by F. J. Weintraub, op. cit.
21.
CameronLake v. (Washington, D.C.), 364 F, 2d 657 (D.C. Cir. 1962). Cited by F. J. Weintraub, op. cit.
22.
Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967). Cited by F. J. Weintraub, op. cit.
23.
Madera v. Board of Education of City of New York, 386 F. 2d 778 (2d Cir. 1967) reversing, 267 F. Supp. 356 (S.D.N.Y. 1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 1028 (1968). Cited by F. J. Weintraub, op. cit.
McLaughlin v. Florida, 379 U.S. 184 (1964). Cited by F. J. Weintraub, op. cit.
26.
McMillan v. Board of Education (N.Y.), 430 F. 2d 1145 (2d Cir. 1970).
27.
MercerJ. R.Sociocultural factors in labeling mental retardates. Peabody Journal of Education, 1971; 48, 188–203.
28.
Mills v. Bd. of Educ. of D.C. (Washington, D.C.), No. 1939–71 (D. D. C. 1971). (Inequality in Education, 1972, No. 12).
29.
MuirW. K.Jr.Prayer in the public schools.Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967.
30.
Pennsylvania Association for Retarded Children v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 334 F. Supp. 1257 (E. D. Pa. 1971).
31.
Pennsylvania court rule on education for all “a historic step”.PCMR Message, November, 1971; No. 27.
32.
Realy v. Caine (N.Y.), 230 N.Y. 2d 453 (Sup. Ct. 1962). Cited by E. R. Collins, op. cit.
33.
Rights for the retarded.Time, October 25, 1971; 53–54.
34.
RossS. L.Jr.DeYoungH. G., & CohenJ. S.Confrontation: Special education placement and the law. Exceptional Children, 1971; 38, 5–12.
35.
Simpkins v. Consolidated School District of Aiken County(South Carolina), No. 71–784 (D. S.C. 1971). (Inequality in Education, 1972; No. 12).
36.
Smuck v. Hobson (Washington, D.C.), 408 F. 2d 175 (D.C. Cir. 1969). Cited by F. J. Weintraub, op. cit.
37.
Spangler v. Pasadena City Board of Education(Southern Cal.), 311 F. Supp. 501 (C. D. Cal. 1970). (Exceptional Children, 1971; 38, No. 1).
38.
Special District for the Education and Training of Handicapped Children v. Wheeler (Mo.), 408 S. W. 2d 60 (1966). Cited by E. C. Bolmeier, op. cit.
39.
State ex. rel. Beattie v. State Board of Education (Wis.), 172 N. W. 153 (1919). Cited by F. J. Weintraub, op. cit.
40.
State ex. rel. Kelley v. Ferguson (Neb.), 144 N. W. 1059; 95 Neb. 63 (1914). Cited by F. J. Weintraub, op. cit.
41.
State v. Ghrist, 270 N. W. 376, 222 Iowa 1069 (1936). Cited by E. C. Bolmeier, op. cit.
42.
State v. Jackson (N. H.), 71 N. H. 552 (1902). Cited by E. C. Bolmeier, op. cit.
43.
Stewart v. Phillips (Mass.), No. 70-1199-F (D. C. Mass. 1970). Cited by E. R. Collins, op. cit.
44.
Sunflower County, Mississippi (August, 1970). Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit review of procedures for integration. (Exceptional Children, 1971; 38, No. 1).
45.
Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education (N. C.), 300 F. Supp. 1358 (W. D. N. C. 1969). Cited by F. J. Weintraub, op. cit.
46.
SEASIM—Special Education Administration Simulation component of Monroe City Simulator. Report. Columbus, O.: University Council for Educational Administration, n. d.
47.
Van Allen v. McCleary (N.Y.), 211 N.Y.S. 2d 501 (Sup. Ct. 1961). Cited by F. J. Weintraub, op. cit.
48.
Watson v. Cambridge (Mass.), 157 Mass. 561, 32 N. E. 864 (1893). Cited by R. R. Hamilton and P. R. Mort, The law and public education. Brooklyn, N.Y.: The Foundations Press, 1969.
49.
WeintraubF. J.Recent influences of law on the identity and placement of children in programs for the mentally retarded. Paper presented at a conference sponsored by the President's Committee on Mental Retardation, the Bureau of Education for the Handicapped, and the Council for Exceptional Children, Lake Arrowhead, Calif., March 1971.
50.
Wisconsin v. Constantineau, 400 U.S. 433 (1971). (Exceptional Children, 1971; 38, No. 1).
51.
Wolf v.The Legislature of the State of Utah, No. 182646 (3rd J. D. C. 1969). (Peabody Journal of Education, 1971; 48, No. 3).