Modality Strengths and Aptitude-Treatment Interaction

Bateman B. D. The efficacy of an auditory and a visual method of first grade reading Instruction with auditory and visual learners. Curriculum Bulletin (School of Education, University of Oregon), 1967; 23, 6–14.

Bracht G. H. The relationship of treatment tasks, personalogical variables, and dependent variables to aptitude-treatment Interaction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Colorado, 1969.

Bracht G. H. Experimental factors related to aptitude-treatment interactions. Review of Educational Research, 1970; 40, 627–645.

Bryan Q. R. Relative importance of intelligence and visual perception in predicting reading achievement. California Journal of Educational Research, 1964; 15, 44–48.

Budoff M. , & Quinlan D. Auditory and visual learning in primary age children. Child Development, 1964; 35, 583–586.

Cooper J. C. , & Gaeth J. H. Interactions of modality with age and with meaningfulness in verbal learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1967; 58, 41–44.

Cronbach L. J. The two disciplines of scientific psychology. The American Psychologist, 1957; 12, 671–684.

Durrell D. D. Durrell Analysis of Reading Difficulty, New York: Harcourt, 1955.

Gagné R. M. (Ed.) Learning and Individual differences. Columbus, Ohio: Merrill, 1966.

Gagné R. M. Curriculum research and the promotion of learning. In Tyler R. W. Gagné R. M. , & Scriven M. (Eds.), Perspectives of curriculum evaluation. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1967.

Goins J. T. Visual perceptual abilities and early reading progress. Supplementary Educational Monograph, 1958; No. 87.

Jones M. J. A comparison of four instructional methods in teaching word recognition to culturally disadvantaged learners. (Doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University) Ann Arbor, Mich.: University Microfilms, 1966; No. 67–5928.

Katz P. A. , & Deutsch M. Visual and auditory efficiency and its relationship to reading in children. Final Report, 1963; Project No. 1099, Cooperative Research Program. Washington: Office of Education, Department of Health, Education, and Welfare.

Mills R. E. An evaluation of techniques for the teaching of word recognition. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Florida) Ann Arbor, Mich.: University Microfilms, 1955; No. 55–1573.

Mills R. E. The Teaching of Word Recognition. Fort Lauderdale, Fla.: The Mills Center, 1964.

Murdock B. B. , & Walker K. D. Modality effects in free recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1969; 8, 665–676.

Nila Sister M. Foundations of a successful reading program. Education, 1953; 73, 543–555.

Paraskevopolous J. N. , & Kirk S. A. The development and psychometric characteristics of the Revised Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic Abilities. Urbana, III.: University of Illinois Press, 1969.

Schultz R. W. , & Hopkins R. H. Presentation mode and meaningfulness as variables in several verbal learning tasks. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1968; 7, 1–13.

Shapiro S. S. Aural paired associates learning in grade school children. Child Development, 1966; 37, 417–424.

Warner F. A. Preferred sense modalities in paired-associate learning of educable mentally retarded children. (Doctoral dissertation, Colorado State College) Ann Arbor, Mich.: University Microfilms, 1967; No. 66–12, 181.

Wepman J. M. The perceptual basis for learning. In Robinson H. A. (Ed.), Meeting Individual differences in reading. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1964.

Woodrow H. A. The ability to learn. Psychological Review, 1946; 53, 147–158.