AllenD. W., & GorthW. P.Fourth annual report to the Charles F. Kettering Foundation.Amherst, Mass.: School of Education, University of Massachusetts, 1971.
2.
BlockJ. H. (Ed.) Mastery learning: Theory and practice.New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, 1971.
3.
BormuthJ. R.On the theory of achievement test Items.Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.
4.
CarrollJ. B.A model of school learning. Teachers College Record, 1963; 64, 723–733.
5.
CarrollJ. B.Problems of measurement related to the concept of learning for mastery. Education Horizons, 1970; 48, 71–80.
6.
CarverR. P.Special problems in measuring change with psychometric devices. In Evaluative research: Strategies and methods.Washington, D.C.: American Institutes for Research, 1970.
7.
CoxR. C.Item selection techniques and evaluation of instructional objectives. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1965; 2, 181–185.
8.
CoxR. C.Evaluative aspects of criterion-referenced measures. In PophamW. J. (Ed.), Criterion-referenced measurement.Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Educational Technology Publications, 1971.
9.
CoxR. C., & GrahamG. T.The development of a sequentially scaled achievement test. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1966; 3, 147–150.
10.
CoxR. C., & VargasJ. C.A comparison of item selection techniques for norm-referenced and criterion-referenced tests. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Chicago, February 1966.
11.
CronbachL. J.Course Improvement through evaluation. Teachers College Record, 1963; 64, 672–683.
12.
CronbachL. J.Validation of educational measures. Proceedings of the 1969 Invitational Conference on Testing Problems.Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Service, 1970.
13.
CronbachL. J., & GleserC.Psychological tests and personnel decisions. (2nd ed.) Urbana, III.: University of Illinois Press, 1965.
14.
EnglehartM. D.A comparison of several item discrimination indices. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1965; 2, 69–76.
15.
FlanaganJ. C.Functional education for the seventies. Phi Delta Kappan, 1967; 49, 27–32.
16.
FlanaganJ. C.Program for learning in accordance with needs. Psychology in the Schools, 1969; 6, 133–136.
17.
GlaserR.Instructional technology and the measurement of learning outcomes. American Psychologist, 1963; 18, 519–521.
18.
GlaserR.Adapting the elementary school curriculum to individual performance. In Proceedings of the 1967 Invitational Conference on Testing Problems.Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Service, 1968.
19.
GlaserR., & NitkoA. J.Measurement in learning and instruction. In ThorndikeR. L. (Ed.), Educational measurement.Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education, 1971.
20.
GorthW. P.SchriberP., & O'ReillyR. P.Comprehensive achievement monitoring.Amherst, Mass.: School of Education, University of Massachusetts, 1971.
21.
HambletonR. K.GorthW. P., & O'ReillyR. P.An application for an evaluation model for classroom instruction. Technical Report No. 16, 1972; Center for Educational Research, School of Education, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
22.
HambletonR. K., & NovickM. R.Toward an integration of theory and method for criterion-referenced tests. American College Testing Technical Report, 1972; in press.
23.
HambletonR. K.RovinelllR., & GorthW. P.Efficiency of various item-examinee sampling designs for estimating test parameters. In Proceedings of the 79th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, 1971; in press.
24.
HivelyW.PattersonH. L., & PageS.A “universe-defined” system of arithmetic achievement tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1968; 5, 275–290.
25.
IvensS. H.An investigation of item analysis, reliability and validity in relation to criterion-referenced tests. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, 1970.
26.
KriewallT. E.Applications of information theory and acceptance sampling principles to the management of mathematics instruction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin, 1969.
27.
LindemanR. H.GorthW. P., & AllenD. W.The evaluation of item performance in an item sampling case. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Los Angeles, February 1969.
28.
LivingstonS. A.The reliability of criterion-referenced measures. Technical Report No. 73, 1970; Center for Social Organization of Schools, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore.
29.
LordF. M.Estimating norms by item sampling. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1962; 22, 259–267.
30.
LordF. M., & NovickM. R.Statistical theories of mental test scores.Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1968.
31.
MillmanJ.Reporting student progress. A case for a criterion-referenced marking system. Phi Delta Kappan, 1970; 52, 226–230.
32.
O'ReillyR. P., & HambletonR. K.A CMI model for an individualized learning program in ninth grade science. Technical Report No. 14, 1971; Center for Educational Research, School of Education, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
PophamW. J., & HusekT. R.Implications of criterion-referenced measurement. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1969; 6, 1–9.
35.
ProgerB. B.Test review No. 4: Peabody Individual Achievement Test. Journal of Special Education, 1970; 4, 461–467.
36.
ShoemakerD. M.Allocation of items and examinees in estimating a norm distribution toy item sampling. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1970; 7, 123–128. (a)
37.
ShoemakerD. M.Item-examinee sampling procedures and associated standard errors in estimating test parameters. Journal of Educational Measurement, 1970; 7, 255–262. (b)