BakerH. J., & LelandB.Detroit Tests of Learning Aptitude.Indianapolis: Public School Publishing, 1935.
2.
AyresA.Patterns of perceptual motor dysfunction in children. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 1965; 20, 335–68.
3.
BakanD.The test of significance in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 1966; 66, 423–37.
4.
BakanD.The influence of phrenology on American psychology. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Science.1966; 2, 200–19.
5.
BatemanB.Implication of a learning disability approach for teaching educable retardates. Mental Retardation, 1967; 5(3), 23–5. (a)
6.
BatemanB.Three approaches to diagnosis and educational planning for children with learning disabilities. Academic Therapy Quarterly, 1967; 3(1). (b)
7.
BlankM.Cognitive processes in auditory discrimination in normal and retarded readers. Child Development1968; 39, 1091–1101.
8.
BraunJ. S.RubinE. Z.BeckG. R.LlorensL. A.MottleyN., & BeallC. D.Cognitive-perceptual-motor functions in children—a suggested change in approach to psychological assessment. Journal of School Psychology, 1965; 3(3).
9.
CorterH. M., & McKinneyJ. D.Flexibility training with educable retarded and bright normal children. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1968; 72, 603–9.
10.
de HirschK.JanskyJ., & LangfordW.Predicting reading failure: A preliminary study.New York: Harper and Row, 1966.
11.
EngelmannS.Relationship between psychological theories and the act of teaching. Journal of School Psychology, 1967; 93–100.
12.
FiskeD. W., & PearsonP. H.Theory and techniques of personality and measurement. Annual Review of Psychology, 1970; 48–86.
13.
FrostigM.Testing as a basis for educational therapy. Journal of Special Education, 1967; 2, 15–34.
14.
FrostigM., & MaslowP.Visual perception and early education. In TarnopolL. (Ed.), Learning disabilities: Introduction to educational and medical management.Springfield, III.: Thomas, 1969; 217–37.
15.
GuilfordJ. P.Zero correlations among tests of intellectual abilities. Psychological Bulletin, 1964; 61, 401–04.
16.
HirshorenA.A comparison of the predictive validity of the Revised Stanford Binet Intelligence Scale and the Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic Abilities. Exceptional Children, 1969; 35, 517–21.
17.
KirkS. A.Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic Abilities: Its origin and implications. In HellmuthJ. (Ed.), Learning Disorders, Vol. III.Seattle, Wash.: Special Child Publications, 1968.
18.
KirkS. A.McCarthyJ., & KirkW.Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic Abilities, (rev. ed.) Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1968.
19.
LambS. H.The Illinois Test of Psycholinguistic Abilities: Implications for diagnosis and remediation. Learning Disabilities: Introduction to Educational and Medical Management. Thomas, 1969; 284.
20.
MannL.The training of reifications: Its significance in the education of teachers of the emotionally disturbed. Paper presented at the 47th Annual International Convention; Council for Exceptional Children, Denver, Colo., April 1969.
21.
MannL.Are we fractionating too much?Academic Therapy, 1969–70; 5, 85–91.
22.
MannL. M., & PhillipsW. A.Fractional practices in special education: A critique. Journal of Exceptional Children, 1967; 33, 311–17.