Multilingual students with developmental disabilities benefit from instruction that supports both comprehension monitoring and the development of expressive language. This study used a multiple-probe design replicated across three third-grade participants to evaluate a combined intervention involving explicit metacognitive self-monitoring routines and interactive digital versus static paper-based anaphoric cueing. Following the intervention, students demonstrated gains in comprehension-question accuracy and increased the complexity of their generated wh-questions. Gains were maintained during the maintenance phase, and accuracy was consistently higher with digital anaphoric cueing compared with paper-based anaphoric cueing. However, student feedback indicated a preference for paper-based anaphoric cueing, citing ease of use and familiarity. Students also reported high satisfaction with the intervention’s goals, procedures, and outcomes across modalities. Findings suggest that embedding multimodal supports within metacognitive frameworks can foster comprehension and language production in ways that recognize and build on multilingual learners’ cognitive and linguistic assets.
BaumannJ. F. (1986). Teaching third-grade students to comprehend anaphoric relationships: The application of a direct instruction model. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 70–90. https://doi.org/10.2307/747961
2.
BautistaM. L. S. (2004). Tagalog-English code-switching as a mode of discourse. Asia Pacific Education Review, 5(2), 226–233
3.
BirdE. K.-R.TrudeauN.SuttonA. (2016). Pulling it all together: The road to lasting bilingualism for children with developmental disabilities. Journal of Communication Disorders, 63, 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2016.07.005
4.
CainK.OakhillJ.BryantP. (2004). Children’s reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.31
5.
CastellónF. A.SturmA.KasariC. (2024). Dual identification: Trajectories to English proficiency for English learners with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 54, 2615–2624. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-023-05994-9
DurkinD. (1978). What classroom observations reveal about reading comprehension instruction. Reading Research Quarterly14(4), 481–533. https://www.jstor.org/stable/747260
9.
EhrlichM.RemondM.TardieuH. (1999). Processing of anaphoric devices in young skilled and less skilled comprehenders: Differences in metacognitive monitoring. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11(1), 29–63.
10.
FinneganE.MazinA. L. (2016). Strategies for increasing reading comprehension skills in students with autism spectrum disorder: A review of the literature. Education and Treatment of Children, 39(2), 187–220. https://doi.org/10.1353/etc.2016.0007
11.
FrithU.SnowlingM. (1983). Reading for meaning and reading for sound in autistic and dyslexic children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 1(4), 329–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-835X.1983.tb00906.x
12.
GarcíaO.KleynT. (2016). Translanguaging with multilingual students: Learning from classroom moments. Routledge.
13.
GastD. L.LloydB. P.LedfordJ. R. (2018). Multiple baseline and multiple probe designs. In LedfordJ. R.GastD. L. (Eds.), Single subject research methodology (3rd ed., pp. 239–282). Routledge.
GreenL. J. (2002). African American English: A linguistic introduction. Cambridge University Press
16.
HappéF.FrithU. (2006). The weak coherence account: Detail-focused cognitive style in autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-005-0039-0
17.
JosephL.RossK.XiaQ.AmspaughL. A.AccursoJ. (2023). Reading comprehension instruction for students with intellectual disabilities: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 70(3), 314–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2021.1892033
18.
MigliariniV.StinsonC. (2021). Inclusive education in the (new) era of anti-immigration policy: Enacting equity for disabled English language learners. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 34(1), 72–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2020.1735563
19.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. https://www.nichd.nih.gov/sites/default/files/publications/pubs/nrp/Documents/report.pdf
20.
O’ConnorI. M.KleinP. D. (2004). Exploration of strategies for facilitating the reading comprehension of high-functioning students with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(2), 115–127. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JADD.0000022605.65655.f1
21.
OzonoffS.PenningtonB. F.RogersS. J. (1991). Executive function deficits in high-functioning autistic individuals: Relationship to theory of mind. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 32(7), 1081–1105. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1991.tb00351.x
22.
ReutebuchC. K.El ZeinF.KimM. K.WeinbergA. N.VaughnS. (2015). Investigating a reading comprehension intervention for high school students with autism spectrum disorder: A pilot study. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 9, 96–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2014.10.002
23.
RouxC.DionE.BarretteA. (2015). Enhancing reading comprehension among students with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder: A randomized pilot study. Canadian Journal of Education, 38, 1–19.
24.
ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A. (1998). Summarizing single-subject research: Issues and applications. Behavioral Disorders, 23(4), 221–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874299802300403
25.
SinghB. D.MooreD. W.FurlongerB. E.AndersonA.BusaccaM. L.EnglishD. L. (2017). Teaching reading comprehension skills to a child with autism using behaviour skills training. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 47(10), 3049–3058. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-017-32297​
26.
SinghB. D.MooreD. W.FurlongerB. E.AndersonA.FallR.HoworthS. (2021). Reading comprehension and autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review of interventions involving single-case experimental designs. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 8(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-020-00200-3
27.
SolisM.El ZeinF.VaughnS.McCulleyL. V.FalcomataT. S. (2015). Reading comprehension interventions for students with autism spectrum disorders: An alternating treatments comparison. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 30(4), 199–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357615583464
28.
SwanM.SmithB. (Eds.). (2001). Learner English: A teacher’s guide to interference and other problems (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
29.
SwansonH. L.O’ConnorR. (2009). The role of working memory and fluency practice on the reading comprehension of students who are dysfluent readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(6), 548–575. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219409338742
30.
TavaresG.FajardoI.ÁvilaV.SalmerónL.FerrerA. (2015). Who do you refer to? How young students with mild intellectual disability confront anaphoric ambiguities in texts and sentences. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 108–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.12.014
31.
YuillN.OakhillJ. (1988). Understanding of anaphoric relations in skilled and less skilled comprehenders. British Journal of Psychology, 79(2), 173–186.
