Most students with complex support needs are taught in separate special education classrooms; one reason is teams that inappropriately use the intensity of support needs as the basis for placement in more restrictive placements. This study used Bayesian multilevel modeling to determine whether the intensity of student support needs predicted educational placement and the extent to which educational placement mediated the relationship between student support needs and outcomes for a sample of 98 elementary students with complex support needs. Findings suggest that students with more intensive support needs were more likely to be placed in more restrictive placements and those restrictive placements predicted lower outcomes. Implications for research and practice related to placement decisions are included.
AgranM.JacksonL.KurthJ. A.RyndakD.BurnetteK.JamesonM.ZagonaA.FitzpatrickH.WehmeyerM. (2020). Why aren’t students with severe disabilities being placed in general education classrooms: Examining the relations among classroom placement, learner outcomes, and other factors. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 45(1), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796919878134
AndzikN. R.ChungY. C.KranakM. P. (2016). Communication opportunities for elementary school students who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 32(4), 272–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2016.1241299
4.
BaconJ.RoodC. E.FerriB. A. (2016). Promoting access through segregation: The emergence of the “prioritized curriculum” class. Teachers College Record, 118(14), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811611801408
5.
BaronRMKennyDA (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. https://doi.org/ 10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173.
6.
BrowderD. M.SpoonerF.LoY-ySaundersA. F.RootJ. R.Ley DavisL.BroshC. R. (2017). Teaching students with moderate intellectual disability to solve word problems. The Journal of Special Education, 51(4), 222–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466917721236
7.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
8.
ColemanO. F.McDonnellJ.BowmanJ.EichelbergerC.RyanJ.ConradiL. A. (2023). Self-contained special educators’ perceptions toward including students with significant cognitive disabilities in general education classes. Exceptionality, 31(4), 291–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2023.2171418
9.
FeldmanR.CarterE. W.AsmusJ.BrockM. E. (2016). Presence, proximity, and peer interactions of adolescents with severe disabilities in general education classrooms. Exceptional Children, 82(2), 192–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402915585481
10.
FinnertyM. S.JacksonL. B.OstergrenR. (2019). Adaptations in general education classrooms for students with severe disabilities: Access, progress assessment, and sustained use. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 44(2), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796919846424
11.
GelmanA.HillJ. (2006). Analytical methods for social research: Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge University Press.
12.
GreshamF. M.ElliottS. N. (2008). Social skills improvement system rating scales. Pearson.
13.
HuntP.Farron-DavisF. (1992). A preliminary investigation of IEP quality and content associated with placement in general education versus special education classes. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 17(4), 247–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/154079699201700406
14.
HuntP.KozleskiE.LeeJ.MortierK.FlemingD.HicksT.BalasubramanianL.LeuG.BrossL. A.MunandarV.DunlapK.StepaniukI.AramburoC.OhY. (2019). Implementing comprehensive literacy instruction for students with severe disabilities in general education classrooms. Exceptional Children, 86(3), 330–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402919880156
15.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2004).
16.
JacksonL.AgranM.LanseyK. R.BakerD.MatthewsS.FitzpatrickH.JamesonM.RyndakD.BurnetteK.TaubD. (2022). Examination of contextual variables across and within different types of placement for elementary students with complex support needs. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 47(4), 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/15407969221132248
17.
JamesonJ. M.HicksT.LanseyK.KurthJ. A.JacksonL.ZagonaA. L.BurnetteK.AgranM.ShogrenK.PaceJ. (2022). Predicting the frequency and significance of social contacts across placements: A Bayesian multilevel model analysis. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 47(4), 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/15407969221136538
18.
JimenezB. A.CroftG.TwineJ.GoreyJ. (2021). Development of engineering habits of mind for students with intellectual disability. The Journal of Special Education, 55(3), 174–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669211009960
19.
KleinertH.Towles-ReevesE.QuenemoenR.ThurlowM.FlueggeL.WesemanL.KerbelA. (2015). Where students with the most significant cognitive disabilities are taught. Exceptional Children, 81(3). 312–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914563697
20.
KnightV. F.WoodC. L.SpoonerF.BrowderD. M.O’BrienC. P. (2015). An exploratory study using science etexts with students with autism spectrum disorder. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 30(2), 86–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357614559214
21.
KuntzE. M.CarterE. W. (2019). Review of interventions supporting secondary students with intellectual disability in general education classes. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 44(2), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796919847483
22.
KurthJ. A.BornK.LoveH. (2016). Ecobehavioral characteristics of self-contained high school classrooms for students with severe cognitive disability. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 41(4), 227–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796916661492
23.
KurthJ. A.JacksonL. (2022). Introduction to the special issue on the impact of placement on outcomes for students with complex support needs. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 47(4), 187–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/15407969221134509
24.
KurthJ. A.Lockman TurnerE.GerasimovaD.HicksT. A.ZagonaA.LanseyK.MansouriM. C.LyonK. J.JamesonM.LoylessR.PaceJ. R. (2022). An investigation of IEP quality associated with special education placement for students with complex support needs. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 47(4), 244–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/15407969221134923
25.
KurthJ. A.RupparA. L.McQuestonJ. A.McCabeK. M.JohnstonR.ToewsS. G. (2019). Types of supplementary aids and services for students with significant support needs. Journal of Special Education, 52, 208–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466918791156
26.
KurthJ. A.RupparA. L.ToewsS. G.McCabeK. M.McQuestonJ. A.JohnstonR. (2019). Considerations in placement decisions for students with extensive support needs: An analysis of LRE statements. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 44(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796918825479
27.
LaSalleT. P.RoachA. T.McGrathD. (2013). The relationship of IEP quality to curricular access and academic achievement for students with disabilities. International Journal of Special Education, 28(1), 135–144. http://www.internationalsped.com/ijse/issue/view/9/7
28.
Lauderdale-LittinS.HowellE.BlacherJ. (2013). Educational placement for children with autism spectrum disorders in public and non-public school settings: The impact of social skills and behavior problems. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 48(4), 469–478. http://www.internationalsped.com/ijse/issue/view/9/7
29.
LowreyK. A.HollingsheadA.HoweryK.BishopJ. B. (2017). More than one way: Stories of UDL and inclusive classrooms. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 42(4), 225–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796917711668
30.
LynchS. M. (2007). Bayesian posterior predictive checks for complex models. Sociological, Methods, and Research, 32, 301–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124103257303
31.
MansouriM. C.KurthJ. A.Lockman TurnerE.ZimmermanK. N.FrickT. A. (2022). Comparison of academic and social outcomes of students with extensive support needs across placements. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 47(2), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/15407969221101792
32.
MaytonM. R.CarterS. L.WheelerJ. J. (2014). Intrusiveness of behavioral treatments for adults with intellectual disability. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35(1), 54–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2013.10.023
33.
McElreathM. (2016). Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan. CRC Press.
34.
MimsP. J.StangerC.SearsJ. A.WhiteW. B. (2018). Applying systematic instruction to teach ELA skills using fictional novels via an iPad App. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 37(4), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/8756870518784711
35.
PenningtonR. C.CourtadeG. R. (2015). An examination of teacher and student behaviors in classrooms for students with moderate and severe intellectual disability. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 59(1), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988x.2014.919141
36.
PenningtonR. C.MohammadM.MimsP. J.MuharibR. (2020). Use of a technology-based instructional package to teach opinion writing to students with intellectual disability. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 55(4), 398–408.
37.
RobertsC.KimS.TandyJ.MeyerN. (2019). Using content area literacy strategies during shared reading to increase comprehension of high school students with moderate intellectual disability on adapted science text. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 54, 147–160.
38.
RowlandC. M.QuinnE. D.SteinerS. A. M. (2015). Beyond Legal:Crafting High-Quality IEPs for Children With Complex Communication Needs. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 37(1), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525740114551632
39.
SauerJ. S.JorgensenC. M. (2016). Still caught in the continuum: A critical analysis of least restrictive environment and its effect on placement of students with intellectual disability. Inclusion, 4(2), 56–74. https://doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988-4.2.56
40.
SchalockR. L.Borthwick-DuffyS.BradleyV. J.BuntinxW. H. E.CoulterD. L.CraigE. M.GomezS. C.LachapelleY.LuckasoonR. A.ReeveA.ShogrenK.SnellM. E.SpreatS.TasseM. J.ThompsonJ. R.Verdugo-AlonsoM. A.WehmeyerM.YeagerM. H. (2010). Intellectual disability: Definition, classification, and systems of supports (11th ed.). American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
41.
ScottB. J.VitaleM. R.MastenW. G. (2016). Implementing instructional adaptations for students with disabilities in inclusive classrooms. Remedial and Special Education, 19(2), 106–119. https://doi.org/10.1177/074193259801900205
42.
ShrinerJ. G.CartyS. J.RoseC. A.ShogrenK. A.KimM.TrachJ. S. (2013). Effects of using a web-based individualized education program decision-making tutorial. The Journal of Special Education, 47(3), 175–185. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466912453940
43.
ShogrenK.WehmeyerM.SchalockR. L.ThompsonJ. R. (2017). Reframing educational supports for students with intellectual disability through strengths-based approaches. In WehmeyerM.ShogrenK. (Eds.), Handbook of research-based practices for educating students with intellectual disability (pp. 17–30). Routledge.
44.
ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L.LaneK. L. (2016). Embedding interventions to promote self-determination within multitiered systems of supports. Exceptionality, 24(4), 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2015.1064421
45.
StroupW. W. (2013). Generalized linear mixed models: Modern concepts, methods, and applications. CRC Press.
46.
ThompsonJ. R.BradleyV. J.BuntinxW. H.SchalockR. L.ShogrenK. A.SnellM. E.WehmeyerM. L.Borthwick-DuffyS.CoulterD. L.CraigE. P.GomezS. C.LachapelleY.LuckassonR. A.ReeveA.SpreatS.TasseM. J.VerdugoM. A.YeagerM. H. (2009). Conceptualizing supports and the support needs of people with intellectual disability. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 47(2), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-47.2.135
47.
ThompsonJ. R.WalkerV. L.ShogrenK. A.WehmeyerM. L. (2018). Expanding inclusive educational opportunities for students with the most significant cognitive disabilities through personalized supports. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 56(6), 396–411. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556-56.6.396
48.
ThompsonJ. R.WalkerV. L.SnodgrassM. R.NelsonJ. A.CarpenterM. E.HagiwaraM.ShogrenK. (2020). Planning supports for students with intellectual disability in general education classrooms. Inclusion, 8(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988-8.1.27
49.
ThompsonJ. R.WalkerV. L.WehmeyerM. L.EdyburnD. L.SnodgrassM. R.CarlsonS. R.CarpenterM. E.NelsonJ. A.LyonK. J.DinaroA. P.ShogrenK. A.PalmerS. B.MichalakN.LaydenS. L.TappM. (2022). Planning for the success of students with IEPs: A support-based approach to inclusive education. W. W. Norton.
50.
ThompsonJ. R.WehmeyerM.HughesC.ShogrenK.LittleT. D.SeoH.SchalockR. L.RealonR. (2014). Supports Intensity Scale - Children’s Version. American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.
51.
ZagonaA. L.KurthJ. A.Lockman TurnerE.PaceJ.ShogrenK.LanseyK.JamesonM.BurnetteK.MansouriM.HicksT.GerasimovaD. (2022). Ecobehavioral analysis of the experiences of students with complex support needs in different classroom types. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 47(4), 209–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/15407969221126
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
