Separate School Placement for Students With Extensive Support Needs and the Potential Impact of Locale and Charter School Enrollment

Abstract

Separate school placements persist for students with extensive support needs (ESN) despite longstanding federal mandates for all students with disabilities to be educated in the least restrictive environment. This study extends research on separate school placement for students with ESN to explore the potential impact of locale and charter school policy by determining (1) the percentage of separate schools in states across locales, (2) whether there is a relationship between the percentages of separate schools in each locale and separate school placement rates, and (3) how the number and location of separate special education charter schools change by state over time. Results showed varying proportions of separate schools among each locale in states with different placement rates, a significant moderate difference between the percentage of separate schools in suburban locales and overall separate school placement rate, and few separate special education charter schools. Implications for research and practice are highlighted.

Keywords

extensive support needs separate schools least restrictive environment quantitative methods

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahearn

(2006). Educational service agencies: Their role in special education. National Association of State Directors of Special Education.

Anderson

E. J.

Brock

M. E.

(2020). Being in the right place at the right time: Educational placement of students with intellectual disability by state and year. Inclusion, 8(3), 210–221. https://doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988-8.3.210

Brock

M. E.

Schaefer

J. M.

(2015). Location matters: Geographic location and educational placement of students with developmental disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 40(2), 154–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796915591988

Carter

E. W.

Hughes

(2005). Increasing social interaction among adolescents with intellectual disabilities and their general education peers: Effective interventions. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 30(4), 179–193. https://doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.30.4.179

Cataldo

(2021). An exploration of social skills in substantially separate settings. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 22, 137–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12554

Education Commission of the States. (2022). 50-State comparison: Charter school policies. https://www.ecs.org/charter-school-policies/

Fisher

Meyer

L. H.

(2002). Development and social competence after two years for students enrolled in inclusive and self-contained educational programs. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 27(3), 165–174. https://doi.org/10.2511/rpsd.27.3.165

Gargiulo

R. M.

Bouck

E. C.

(2019). Special education in contemporary society: An introduction to exceptionality. Sage.

Gee

Gonzalez

Cooper

(2020). Outcomes of inclusive versus separate placements: A matched pairs comparison study. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 45(4), 223–240. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796920943469

10.

Iacono

Douglas

S. N.

Garcia-Melgar

Goldbart

(2022). A scoping review of AAC research conducted in segregated school settings. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 120, 104141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2021.104141

11.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1412 (2004).

12.

Kleinert

H. L.

Kearns

(2022). Reconsidering LRE: Students with the most significant cognitive disabilities and the persistence of separate schools. TIES Center. https://z.umn.edu/reconsidering-lre

13.

Kleinert

H. L.

Towles-Reeves

Quenemoen

Thurlow

M. L.

Fluegge

Weseman

Kerbel

(2015). Where students with the most significant cognitive disabilities are taught: Implications for general curriculum access. Exceptional Children, 81(3), 312–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402914563697

14.

Kurth

J. A.

Ruppar

A. L.

Toews

S. G.

McCabe

K. M.

McQueston

J. A.

Johnston

(2019). Considerations in placement decisions for students with extensive support needs: An analysis of LRE statements. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 44(1), 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1540796918825479

15.

McConnell

Sanford

Martin

Cameto

Hodge

(2021). Skills, behaviors, expectations, and experiences associated with improved postsecondary outcomes for students with significant cognitive disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 46(4), 240–258. https://doi.org/10.1177/15407969211053810

16.

McDonnell

Thorson

Disher

Mathot-Buckner

Mendel

Ray

(2003). The achievement of students with developmental disabilities and their peers without disabilities in inclusive settings: An exploratory study. Education and Treatment of Children, 26(3), 224–236. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42899751

17.

Morningstar

M. E.

Kurth

J. A.

(2017). Status of inclusive educational placement for students with extensive and pervasive support needs. Inclusion, 5(2), 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988.5.2.83

18.

National Center on Education Statistics. (n.d.-a). Fast facts: Charter schools. https://z.umn.edu/nces

19.

National Center on Education Statistics. (n.d.-b). NCES locale classifications and criteria. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/edge/docs/LOCALE_CLASSIFICATIONS.pdf

20.

National Center on Education Statistics. (n.d.-c). Public elementary/secondary school universe survey data . https://nces.ed.gov/ccd/pubschuniv.asp

21.

National Center on Education Statistics. (n.d.-d). School locations & geoassignments-public schools & school districts [Data set]. https://z.umn.edu/ncesdataset

22.

Quirk

Ryndak

D. L.

Taub

(2017). Research and evidence-based practices to promote membership and learning in general education for students with extensive support needs. Inclusion, 5(2), 94–109. https://doi.org/10.1352/2326-6988-5.2.94

23.

Rhim

L. M.

Kothari

Lancet

(2019). Key trends in special education in charter schools: A secondary analysis of the civil rights data collection. National Center for Special Education in Charter Schools. https://z.umn.edu/separatecharter

24.

Soukup

J. H.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

Bashinski

S. M.

Bovaird

J. A.

(2007). Classroom variables and access to the general curriculum for students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 74(1), 101–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290707400106

25.

Thurlow

M. L.

Lazarus

S. S.

Larson

E. D.

Albus

D. A.

Liu

K. K.

Kwong

(2017). Alternate assessments for students with significant cognitive disabilities: Participation guidelines and definitions (NCEO Report 406). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.

26.

U.S. Department of Education. (n.d.). IDEA section 618 state part B child count and educational environments. https://z.umn.edu/childcount

27.

U. S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs. (2021). 42nd annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 2020. https://sites.ed.gov/idea/2020-annual-report-congress-idea/

28.

Wakeman

Y.-C.

Ghere

Johnson

Bowman

Clausen

A. M.

(2022). Separate school placement trends by category and age for students with extensive support needs (TIES Center Report 105). TIES Center.

29.

Wehmeyer

M. L.

Lattin

D. L.

Lapp-Rincker

Agran

(2003). Access to the general curriculum of middle school students with mental retardation: An observational study. Remedial and Special Education, 24(5), 262–272. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325030240050201

30.

Westling

D. L.

(2019). Inclusion in the United States: Correlations between key state variables. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 23(6), 575–593. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1441340