Instruction targeting the underlying math problem structure is identified as an evidence-based practice for students with a specific learning disability (SLD). Furthermore, schema-based instruction is identified as a potentially evidence-based practice for students with a SLD. This study extended prior work by (a) using a teacher as the implementer, (b) evaluating the efficacy of an adaptable intervention, and (c) evaluating student performance on generalized and combined schema structure problems. The participants included 12 fourth- and fifth-grade students with a disability and receiving supplemental mathematics instruction in a resource room setting. The intervention package consisted of a problem-solving mnemonic and schema-based instruction for mathematics. A multiple-probe design across participant groups was used to establish a functional relation. Students improved performance on word problems representing simple, generalized, and combined schema structures. The aggregated Tau-U effect size (ES) for this study was 95% (CI90 [83%, 100%]) and the aggregated between-case standardized mean difference (BC-SMD) was 3.05 (CI95 [2.54, 3.60]).
BarlowD. H.NockM. K.HersenM. (2009). Single case experimental designs: Strategies studying behavior change (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Pearson.
2.
ButlerF. M.MillerS. P.CrehanK.BabbittB.PierceT. (2003). Fraction instruction for students with mathematics disabilities: Comparing two teaching sequences. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 99–111.
3.
CoccoS. (2006). Student leadership development: The contribution of project-based learning (Unpublished master’s thesis). Royal Roads University, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
4.
CoddingR. S.VanDerHeydenA. M.MartinR. J.DesaiS.AllardN.PerraultL. (2016). Manipulating treatment dose: Evaluating the frequency of a small group intervention targeting whole number operations. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 31, 208–220.
5.
CookS. C.CollinsL. W.MorinL. L.RiccominiP. J. (2019). Schema-based instruction for mathematical word problem solving: An evidence-based review for students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0731948718823080
6.
CoxS. K.RootJ. R. (2018). Modified schema-based instruction to develop flexible mathematics problem-solving strategies for students with autism spectrum disorder. Remedial and Special Education. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0741932518792660
7.
DonovanM. S.CrossC. T. (Eds.). (2002). Minority students in special and gifted education. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
8.
FloresM. M.HintonV. M.BurtonM. E. (2016). Teaching problem solving to students receiving tiered interventions using the concrete-representational-abstract sequence and schema-based instruction. Preventing School Failure, 60, 345–355.
9.
FuchsL. S.FuchsD.PrenticeK.HamlettC. L.FinelliR.CoureyS. J. (2004). Enhancing mathematical problem solving among third-grade students with schema-based instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 635–647.
10.
FuchsL. S.SeethalerP. M.PowellS. R.FuchsD.HamlettC. L.FletcherJ. M. (2008). Effects of preventative tutoring on the mathematical problem solving of third-grade students with math and reading difficulties. Exceptional Children, 74, 155–173.
11.
FuchsL. S.ZumetaR. O.SchumacherR. F.PowellS. R.SeethalerP. M.HamlettC. L.FuchsD. (2010). The effects of schema-broadening instruction on second graders’ word-problem performance and their ability to represent word problems with algebraic equations: A randomized control study. The Elementary School Journal, 110, 440–463.
12.
GearyD. C. (2011). Cognitive predictors of achievement growth in mathematics: A 5-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 47, 1539–1552.
13.
GerstenR.ChardD. J.JayanthiM.BakerS. K.MorphyP.FlojoJ. (2009). Mathematics instruction for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of instructional components. Review of Educational Research, 79, 1202–1242.
14.
GriffinC. C.JitendraA. K. (2009). Word problem-solving instruction in inclusive third-grade mathematics classrooms. The Journal of Educational Research, 102, 187–202.
15.
HarrisonJ. R.StateT. M.EvansS. W.SchambergT. (2016). Construct and predictive validity of social acceptability: Scores from high school teacher ratings on the School Intervention Rating Form. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 18, 111–123.
16.
HornerR. H.CarrE. G.HalleJ.McGeeG.OdomS.WoleryM. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–179.
17.
HuntJ. H.VasquezE.III. (2014). Effects of ratio strategies intervention on knowledge of ratio equivalence for students with learning disability. The Journal of Special Education, 48, 180–190.
18.
JitendraA. K.DiPipiC. M.Perron-JonesN. (2002). An exploratory study of schema-based word-problem-solving instruction for middle school students with learning disabilities: An emphasis on conceptual and procedural understanding. The Journal of Special Education, 36, 23–38.
19.
JitendraA. K.DupuisD. N.RodriguezM. C.ZaslofskyA. F.SlaterS.Cozine-CorroyK.ChurchC. (2013). A randomized controlled trial of the impact of schema-based instruction on mathematical outcomes for third-grade students with mathematics difficulties. The Elementary School Journal, 114, 252–276.
20.
JitendraA. K.DupuisD. N.ZaslofskyA. F. (2014). Curriculum-based measurement and standards-based mathematics: Monitoring the arithmetic word problem-solving performance of third-grade students at risk for mathematics difficulties. Learning Disability Quarterly, 37, 241–251.
21.
JitendraA. K.GriffinC. C.Deatline-BuchmanA.SczesniakE. (2007). Mathematical word problem solving in third-grade classrooms. The Journal of Educational Research, 100, 283–302.
22.
JitendraA. K.HoffK.BeckM. M. (1999). Teaching middle school students with learning disabilities to solve word problems using a schema-based approach. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 50–64.
23.
JitendraA. K.Petersen-BrownS.LeinA. E.ZaslofskyA. F.KunkelA. K.JungP. G.EganA. M. (2015). Teaching mathematical word problem solving: The quality of evidence for strategy instruction priming the problem structure. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48, 51–72.
24.
JitendraA. K.RodriguezM.KaniveR.HuangJ. P.ChurchC.CorroyK. A.ZaslofskyA. (2013). Impact of small-group tutoring interventions on the mathematical problem solving and achievement of third-grade students with mathematics difficulties. Learning Disability Quarterly, 36, 21–35.
25.
JitendraA. K.StarJ. R. (2011). Meeting the needs of students with learning disabilities in inclusive mathematics classrooms: The role of schema-based instruction on mathematical problem-solving. Theory Into Practice, 50, 12–19.
26.
KauffmanJ. M.BadarJ. (2014). Instruction, not inclusion, should be the central issue in special education: An alternative view from the USA. Journal of International Special Needs Education, 17, 13–20.
KingS. A.LemonsC. J.DavidsonK. A. (2016). Math interventions for students with autism spectrum disorder: A best-evidence synthesis. Exceptional Children, 82, 443–462.
29.
KratochwillT. R.HitchcockJ. H.HornerR. H.LevinJ. R.OdomS. L.RindskopfD. M.ShadishW. R. (2013). Single-case intervention research design standards. Remedial and Special Education, 34, 26–38.
30.
LazarusS. S.ThompsonS. J.ThurlowM. L. (2006, January). How students access accommodations in assessment and instruction: Results of a survey of special education teachers (Issue Brief No. 7). College Park: Educational Policy Reform Research Institute, University of Maryland.
31.
MannH. B.WhitneyD. R. (1947). On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 18, 50–60.
32.
ManolovR.GuileraG.SolanasA. (2017). Issues and advances in the systematic review of single-case research: A commentary on the exemplars. Remedial and Special Education, 38, 387–393.
33.
MarshallS. P. (1995). Schemas in problem solving. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
34.
McLeskeyJ.LandersE.WilliamsonP.HoppeyD. (2012). Are we moving toward educating student with disabilities in less restrictive settings?The Journal of Special Education, 46, 131–140.
35.
OdomS. L.BrantlingerE.GerstenR.HornerR. H.ThompsonB.HarrisK. R. (2005). Research in special education: Scientific methods and evidence-based practices. Exceptional Children, 71, 137–148.
36.
OwenR. L.FuchsL. S. (2002). Mathematical problem-solving strategy instruction for third-grade students with learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 23, 268–278.
37.
ParkerR. I.VannestK. J.DavisJ. L. (2011). Effect size in single-case research: A review of nine nonoverlap techniques. Behavior Modification, 35, 303–322.
38.
ParkerR. I.VannestK. J.DavisJ. L.SauberS. B. (2011). Combining nonoverlap and trend for single-case research: Tau-U. Behavior Therapy, 42, 284–299.
39.
PeltierC.VannestK. J. (2016). Schema-based strategy instruction and the mathematical problem-solving performance of two students with emotional or behavioral disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 39, 521–543.
40.
PeltierC.VannestK. J. (2017). A meta-analysis of schema instruction on the problem-solving performance of elementary school students. Review of Educational Research, 87, 899–920.
41.
PeltierC.VannestK. J. (2018). The effects of schema-based instruction on the mathematical problem solving of students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 43, 277–289.
42.
PeltierC. J.VannestK. J.MarbachJ. J. (2018). A meta-analysis of schema instruction implemented in single-case experimental designs. The Journal of Special Education, 52, 89–100.
43.
PólyaG. (1945). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
44.
PowellS. R. (2011). Solving word problems using schemas: A review of the literature. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26, 94–108.
45.
PowellS. R.FuchsL. S.CirinoP. T.FuchsD.ComptonD. L.ChangasP. C. (2015). Effects of a multitier support system on calculation, word problem, and prealgebraic performance among at-risk learners. Exceptional Children, 81, 443–470.
46.
PustejovskyJ. E. (2016). scdhlm: A web-based calculator for between-case standardized mean differences (Version 0.3.1) [Web application]. Retrieved from https://jepusto.shinyapps.io/scdhlm
47.
PustejovskyJ. E.HedgesL. V.ShadishW. R. (2014). Design-comparable effect sizes in multiple baseline designs: A general modeling framework. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 39, 368–393.
48.
RasmussenC. L.KingK. D. (2000). Locating starting points in differential equations: A realistic mathematics education approach. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 31, 161–172.
49.
ReimersT. M.WackerD. P.CooperL. J. (1991). Evaluation of the acceptability of treatments for their children’s behavioral difficulties: Ratings by parents receiving services in an outpatient clinic. Child & Family Behavior Therapy, 13, 53–71.
50.
RockwellS. B.GriffinC. C.JonesH. A. (2011). Schema-based strategy instruction in mathematics and the word problem-solving performance of a student with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 26, 87–95.
51.
SpoonerF.RootJ. R.SaundersA. F.BrowderD. M. (2018). An updated evidence-based practice review on teaching mathematics to students with moderate and severe developmental disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 40, 150–165.
52.
TimmermansR. E.Van LieshoutE. C.VerhoevenL. (2007). Gender-related effects of contemporary math instruction for low performers on problem-solving behavior. Learning and Instruction, 17, 42–54.
53.
TraversJ. C.CookB. G.TherrienW. J.CoyneM. D. (2016). Replication research and special education. Remedial and Special Education, 37, 195–204.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitation Services, Office of Special Education Programs. (2018). 40th annual report to congress on the Implementation of the Individuals With Disabilities Education Act, 2018. Washington, DC: Author.
56.
University of Chicago School Mathematics Project. (n.d.). Everyday mathematics: Resource information center. Available from http://everydaymath.uchicago.edu/
57.
ValentineJ. C.Tanner-SmithE. E.PustejovskyJ. E.LauT. S. (2016). Between-case standardized mean difference effect sizes for single-case designs: A primer. Oslo, Norway: The Campbell Collaboration.
58.
VanDerHeydenA.HarveyM. (2013). Using data to advance learning outcomes in schools. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 15, 205–213.
59.
VannestK. J.ParkerR. I.GonenO.AdiguzelT. (2016). Single case research: Web based calculators for SCR analysis (Version 2.0) [Web-based application]. College Station: Texas A&M University. Available from http://singlecaseresearch.org
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
