Early number skills, comprised of both informal and formal skills, are associated with later mathematics achievement. Thus, the development of foundational early number skills is an important aspect of early mathematics instruction. This study explored relations between early number skills gains and mathematics achievement for students at risk for mathematics difficulties in a kindergarten intervention study. Results indicated strong relationships between formal number skills gains and mathematics achievement across kindergarten and Grade 1. Intervention participants demonstrated larger informal and formal early number skills gains compared with their control peers, and relations between early number skills gains and first-grade mathematics achievement were moderated by intervention participation. Importantly, these findings suggest that formal and informal number skills gains may be critical components of later mathematics achievement for at-risk students. Implications for special education and intervention in tiered instructional systems are discussed.
AlcockL.AnsariD.BatchelorS.BissonM.-J.De SmedtB.GilmoreC.. . . WeberK. (2016). Challenges in mathematical cognition: A collaboratively-derived research agenda. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 2, 20–41. doi:10.5964/jnc.v2i1.10
2.
AunioP.NiemivirtaM. (2010). Predicting children’s mathematical performance in grade one by early numeracy. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 427–435. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2010.06.003
3.
AunolaK.LeskinenE.LerkkanenM.-K.Jari-ErikN. (2004). Developmental dynamics of math performance from preschool to grade 2. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 699–713. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.4.699
4.
BaileyD.DuncanG. J.OdgersC. L.YuW. (2017). Persistence and fadeout in the impacts of child and adolescent interventions. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 10, 7–39. doi:10.1080/19345747.2016.1232459
5.
BakerS.GerstenR.LeeD. S. (2002). A synthesis of empirical research on teaching mathematics to low-achieving students. The Elementary School Journal, 103(1), 51-73. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/499715
6.
BenoitL.LehalleH.MolinaM.TijusC.JouenF. (2013). Young children’s mapping between arrays, number words, and digits. Cognition, 129, 95–101. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.06.005
7.
BlairC.UrsacheA.GreenbergM.Vernon-FeagansL. (2015). Multiple aspects of self-regulation uniquely predict mathematics but not letter–word knowledge in the early elementary grades. Developmental Psychology, 51, 459–472. doi:10.1037/a0038813
8.
BodovskiK.FarkasG. (2007). Mathematics growth in early elementary school: The roles of beginning knowledge, student engagement, and instruction. Elementary School Journal, 108, 115–130. doi:10.1086/525550
9.
BryantD. P.BryantB. R.GerstenR. M.ScammaccaN. N.FunkC.WinterA.. . . PoolC. (2008). The effects of Tier 2 intervention on the mathematics performance of first-grade students who are at risk for mathematics difficulties. Learning Disability Quarterly, 31, 47–63. doi:10.2307/20528817
10.
ChenQ.LiJ. (2014). Association between individual differences in non-symbolic number acuity and math performance: A meta-analysis. Acta Psychologica, 148, 163–172. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.01.016
11.
ChuF. W.vanMarleK.GearyD. C. (2015). Early numerical foundations of young children’s mathematical development. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 132, 205–212. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2015.01.006
12.
ClaessensA.EngelM. (2013). How important is where you start? Early mathematics knowledge and later school success. Teachers College Record, 115, 1–29.
13.
ClarkeB.DoablerC.SmolkowskiK.Kurtz NelsonE.FienH.BakerS. K.KostyD. (2016). Testing the immediate and long-term efficacy of a Tier 2 kindergarten mathematics intervention. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 9, 607–634. doi:10.1080/19345747.2015.1116034
14.
ClarkeB.DoablerC. T.Strand CaryM.KostyD. B.BakerS. K.FienH.SmolkowskiK. (2014). Preliminary evaluation of a Tier-2 mathematics intervention for first grade students: Utilizing a theory of change to guide formative evaluation activities. School Psychology Review, 43, 160–177.
15.
ClarkeB.GerstenR. M.DiminoJ.RolfhusE. (2011). Assessing Student Proficiency of Number Sense (ASPENS). Longmont, CO: Cambium Learning Group.
16.
ClaroS.PauneskuD.DweckC. S. (2016). Growth mindset tempers the effects of poverty on academic achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, 8664–8668. doi:10.1073/pnas.1608207113
17.
ClementsD. H.SaramaJ. (2007). Effects of a preschool mathematics curriculum: Summative research on the building blocks project. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38, 136–163. doi:10.2307/30034954
18.
Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common core state standards: Mathematics. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices.
19.
de HaanA. K. E.ElbersE.LesemanP. P. M. (2014). Teacher- and child-managed academic activities in preschool and kindergarten and their influence on children’s gains in emergent academic skills. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 28, 43–58. doi:10.1080/02568543.2013.851750
20.
De SmedtB.GilmoreC. K. (2011). Defective number module or impaired access? Numerical magnitude processing in first graders with mathematical difficulties. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108, 278–292. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2010.09.003
21.
De SmedtB.NoëlM.-P.GilmoreC.AnsariD. (2013). How do symbolic and non-symbolic numerical magnitude processing skills relate to individual differences in children’s mathematical skills? A review of evidence from brain and behavior. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 2, 48–55. doi:10.1016/j.tine.2013.06.001
22.
DesoeteA.CeulemansA.De WeerdtF.PietersS. (2012). Can we predict mathematical learning disabilities from symbolic and non-symbolic comparison tasks in kindergarten? Findings from a longitudinal study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 64–81. doi:10.1348/2044-8279.002002
23.
DoablerC. T.BakerS. K.KostyD. B.SmolkowskiK.ClarkeB.MillerS. J.FienH. (2015). Examining the association between explicit mathematics instruction and student mathematics achievement. The Elementary School Journal, 115, 303–333. doi:10.1086/679969
24.
DoablerC. T.ClarkeB.FienH. (2012). ROOTS Assessment of Early Numeracy Skills (RAENS) (Unpublished measurement instrument). Eugene, OR: Center on Teaching and Learning, University of Oregon.
25.
DoablerC. T.ClarkeB.KostyD. B.Kurtz-NelsonE.FienH.SmolkowskiK.BakerS. K. (2016). Testing the efficacy of a Tier 2 mathematics intervention: A conceptual replication study. Exceptional Children, 83, 92–110. doi:10.1177/0014402916660084
26.
DoablerC. T.Strand CaryM.JungjohannK.ClarkeB.FienH.BakerS.. . . ChardD. (2012). Enhancing core mathematics instruction for students at risk for mathematics disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 44(4), 48–57. doi:10.1177/004005991204400405
27.
DuncanG. J.DowsettC. J.ClaessensA.MagnusonK.HustonA. C.KlebanovP.. . . JapelC. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43, 1428–1446. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1428
28.
DysonN. I.JordanN. C.GluttingJ. (2013). A number sense intervention for low-income kindergartners at risk for mathematics difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46, 166–181. doi:10.1177/0022219411410233
29.
FryeD.BaroodyA. J.BurchinalM.CarverS. M.JordanN. C.McDowellJ. (2013). Teaching math to young children practice guide (Practice Guide No. NCEE 2014-4005). Washington, DC: National Center for Education and Regional Assistance (NCEE), Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/PracticeGuide/wwc_empg_summary_020714.pdf
30.
FuchsL. S.ComptonD. L.FuchsD.PaulsenK.BryantJ. D.HamlettC. L. (2005). The prevention, identification, and cognitive determinants of math difficulty. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 493–513. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.97.3.493
31.
FuchsL. S.VaughnS. (2012). Responsiveness-to-intervention: A decade later. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 195–203. doi:10.1177/0022219412442150
32.
GerstenR. M.BeckmannS.ClarkeB.FoegenA.MarchL.StarJ. R.WitzelB. (2009). Assisting students struggling with mathematics: Response to Intervention (RtI) for elementary and middle schools (Practice Guide Report No. NCEE 2009-4060). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
33.
GerstenR. M.ClarkeB.JordanN.Newman-GoncharR.HaymondK.WilkinsC. (2012). Universal screening in mathematics for the primary grades: Beginnings of a research base. Exceptional Children, 78, 423–445. Retrieved from http://cec.metapress.com/content/B75U2072576416T7
34.
GerstenR. M.RolfhusE.ClarkeB.DeckerL. E.WilkinsC.DiminoJ. (2015). Intervention for first graders with limited number knowledge: Large-scale replication of a randomized controlled trial. American Educational Research Journal, 52, 516–546. doi:10.3102/0002831214565787
35.
GinsburgH. P.BaroodyA. J. (2003). Test of Early Mathematics Ability, Third Edition (TEMA-3). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
36.
GöbelS. M.WatsonS. E.LervågA.HulmeC. (2014). Children’s arithmetic development: It is number knowledge, not the approximate number sense, that counts. Psychological Science, 25, 789–798. doi:10.1177/0956797613516471
37.
Hassinger-DasB.JordanN. C.GluttingJ.IrwinC.DysonN. (2014). Domain-general mediators of the relation between kindergarten number sense and first-grade mathematics achievement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 118, 78–92. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2013.09.008
JordanN. C.GluttingJ.DysonN. (2012). Number Sense Screener (NSS) user’s guide, K-1. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
40.
JordanN. C.GluttingJ.RamineniC. (2008). A number sense assessment tool for identifying children at risk for mathematical difficulties. In DowkerA. (Ed.), Mathematical difficulties: Psychology and intervention (pp. 45–57). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
41.
JordanN. C.KaplanD.LocuniakM. N.RamineniC. (2007). Predicting first-grade math achievement from developmental number sense trajectories. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22, 36–46. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2007.00229.x
42.
KlineR. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
43.
KolkmanM. E.KroesbergenE. H.LesemanP. P. M. (2013). Early numerical development and the role of non-symbolic and symbolic skills. Learning and Instruction, 25, 95–103. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.12.001
44.
KurdekL. A.SinclairR. J. (2001). Predicting reading and mathematics achievement in fourth-grade children from kindergarten readiness scores. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 451–455. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.3.451
45.
LeFevreJ.-A.FastL.SkwarchukS.-L.Smith-ChantB. L.BisanzJ.KamawarD.Penner-WilgerM. (2010). Pathways to mathematics: Longitudinal predictors of performance. Child Development, 81, 1753–1767. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01508.x
46.
LibertusM. E.OdicD.FeigensonL.HalberdaJ. (2016). The precision of mapping between number words and the approximate number system predicts children’s formal math abilities. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 150, 207–226. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2016.06.003
47.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. (2016). School and district profiles. Boston: Author. Available from http://profiles.doe.mass.edu
48.
MazzoccoM. M. M.ThompsonR. E. (2005). Kindergarten predictors of math learning disability. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 20, 142–155. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2005.00129.x
49.
MejiasS.MussolinC.RousselleL.GrégoireJ.NoëlM.-P. (2012). Numerical and nonnumerical estimation in children with and without mathematical learning disabilities. Child Neuropsychology, 18, 550–575. doi:10.1080/09297049.2011.625355
50.
MillerB.VaughnS.FreundL. (2014). Learning disabilities research studies: Findings from NICHD funded projects. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 7, 225–231. doi:10.1080/19345747.2014.927251
51.
MorganP. L.FarkasG.MaczugaS. (2015). Which instructional practices most help first-grade students with and without mathematics difficulties?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37, 184–205. doi:10.3102/0162373714536608
52.
MorganP. L.FarkasG.WuQ. (2009). Five-year growth trajectories of kindergarten children with learning difficulties in mathematics. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42, 306–321. doi:10.1177/0022219408331037
53.
MundyE.GilmoreC. K. (2009). Children’s mapping between symbolic and nonsymbolic representations of number. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103, 490–502. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2009.02.003
54.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (2013). Mplus user’s guide (Version 7.1). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
55.
National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
56.
NoëlM.-P.RousselleL. (2011). Developmental changes in the profiles of dyscalculia: An explanation based on a double exact-and-approximate number representation model. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, Article 165. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00165
ParkJ.BermudezV.RobertsR. C.BrannonE. M. (2016). Non-symbolic approximate arithmetic training improves math performance in preschoolers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 152, 278–293. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2016.07.011
59.
Pearson Education. (2008). Stanford Achievement Test [SAT-10]. San Antonio, TX: Author.
60.
PurpuraD. J.BaroodyA. J.LoniganC. J. (2013). The transition from informal to formal mathematical knowledge: Mediation by numeral knowledge. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 453–464. doi:10.1037/a0031753
61.
PurpuraD. J.LoganJ. A. R. (2015). The nonlinear relations of the approximate number system and mathematical language to early mathematics development. Developmental Psychology, 51, 1717–1724. doi:10.1037/dev0000055
62.
RamaniG. B.SieglerR. S. (2015). How informal learning activities can promote children’s numerical knowledge. In KadoshR. C.DowkerA. (Eds.), Oxford handbooks online. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199642342.013.012
63.
Rittle-JohnsonB.FyfeE. R.HoferK. G.FarranD. C. (2016). Early math trajectories: Low-income children’s mathematics knowledge from ages 4 to 11. Child Development. Advanced online publication. doi:10.1111/cdev.12662
64.
RousselleL.NoëlM.-P. (2007). Basic numerical skills in children with mathematics learning disabilities: A comparison of symbolic vs non-symbolic number magnitude processing. Cognition, 102, 361–395. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2006.01.005
65.
RyooJ. H.MolfeseV. J.BrownE. T.KarpK. S.WelchG. W.BovairdJ. A. (2015). Examining factor structures on the Test of Early Mathematics Ability–3: A longitudinal approach. Learning and Individual Differences, 41, 21–29. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.06.003
66.
SasanguieD.DefeverE.MaertensB.ReynvoetB. (2014). The approximate number system is not predictive for symbolic number processing in kindergarteners. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 271–280. doi:10.1080/17470218.2013.803581
67.
SasanguieD.De SmedtB.DefeverE.ReynvoetB. (2012). Association between basic numerical abilities and mathematics achievement. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 30, 344–357. doi:10.1111/j.2044-835X.2011.02048.x
68.
SasanguieD.GöbelS. M.MollK.SmetsK.ReynvoetB. (2013). Approximate number sense, symbolic number processing, or number–space mappings: What underlies mathematics achievement?Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114, 418–431. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2012.10.012
69.
SchneiderM.BeeresK.CobanL.MerzS.Susan SchmidtS.StrickerJ.De SmedtB. (2017). Associations of non-symbolic and symbolic numerical magnitude processing with mathematical competence: A meta-analysis. Developmental Science, 20(3), 1–16. Advanced online publication. doi:10.1111/desc.12372
70.
SchultingA. B.MaloneP. S.DodgeK. A. (2005). The effect of school-based kindergarten transition policies and practices on child academic outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 41, 860–871. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.41.6.860
71.
SkwarchukS.-L.SowinskiC.LeFevreJ.-A. (2014). Formal and informal home learning activities in relation to children’s early numeracy and literacy skills: The development of a home numeracy model. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 121, 63–84. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2013.11.006
72.
StarkeyP.KleinA. (2008). Sociocultural influences on young children’s mathematical knowledge. In SarachoO. N.SpodekB. (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on mathematics in early childhood education (pp. 253–276). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
73.
TollS. W. M.Van ViersenS.KroesbergenE. H.Van LuitJ. E. H. (2015). The development of (non-)symbolic comparison skills throughout kindergarten and their relations with basic mathematical skills. Learning and Individual Differences, 38, 10–17. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2014.12.006
74.
VerdineB. N.IrwinC. M.GolinkoffR. M.Hirsh-PasekK. (2014). Contributions of executive function and spatial skills to preschool mathematics achievement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 126, 37–51. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2014.02.012
