A phonics-based reading curriculum in which students used an iPad to respond was created for students with developmental disabilities not able to verbally participate in traditional phonics instruction due to their use of augmentative and assistive communication. Time delay and a system of least prompts used in conjunction with text-to-speech software enabled students to participate in phonics instruction that included segmenting, decoding, sight words, and comprehension after reading a decodable short passage. Students were randomly assigned to a treatment group who received the phonics instruction or a control group who received sight word instruction on the iPad. A repeated-measures ANOVA found that students who received the iPad-based phonics curriculum outperformed the control students. Hierarchical linear model (HLM) analysis supports a two-level model with a time by group membership interaction effect, the inclusion of student-level variables was not statistically significant.
Ahlgrim-DelzellL.BrowderD. M.WoodA. L. (2014). Effects of systematic instruction and an augmentative communication device on phonics skills acquisition for students with moderate intellectual disability who are nonverbal. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 49, 517–534.
2.
AllorJ. H.MathesP. G.RobertsJ.CheathamJ. P.ChamplinT. M. (2010). Comprehensive reading instruction for students with intellectual disabilities: Findings from the first three years of a longitudinal study. Psychology in the Schools, 47, 445–466.
3.
AllorJ. H.MathesP. G.RobertsJ.JonesF. G.ChamplinT. M. (2010). Teaching students with moderate intellectual disabilities to read: An experimental examination of a comprehensive reading intervention. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45, 3–22.
4.
The Attainment Company. (n.d.). GoTalk Now. Verona, WI: Author.
5.
BaileyR. L.AngellM. E.StonerJ. B. (2011). Improving literacy skills in students with complex communication needs who use augmentative/alternative communication systems. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 46, 352–368.
6.
BrowderD. M.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.CourtadeG.GibbsS. L.FlowersC. (2008). Evaluation of the effectiveness of an early literacy program for students with significant developmental disabilities using group randomized trial research. Exceptional Children, 75, 33–52.
7.
BrowderD. M.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.FlowersC.BakerJ. N. (2012). An evaluation of a multicomponent early literacy program for students with severe developmental disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 33, 237–246.
BrowderD. M.GibbsS.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.CourtadeG.MrazM.FlowersC. (2009). Literacy for students with severe developmental disabilities: What should we teach and what should we hope to achieve?Remedial and Special Education, 30, 269–282.
10.
BrowderD. M.WakemanS. Y.SpoonerF.Ahlgrim-DelzellL.AlgozzineB. (2006). Research on reading instruction for individuals with significant cognitive disabilities. Exceptional Children, 72, 392–408.
11.
ChaiZ.VailC. O.AyresK. M. (2015). Using an iPad application to promote early literacy development in young children with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 48, 268–278.
12.
ChiangH. M.LinY. H. (2007). Reading comprehension instruction for students with autism spectrum disorders: A review of the literature. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 22, 259–267.
13.
Coleman-MartinM. B.HellerK. W.CihakD. F.IrvineK. L. (2005). Using computer-assisted instruction and the nonverbal reading approach to teach word identification. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 20, 80–90.
14.
ConnorC. M.AlbertoP. A.ComptonD. L.O’ConnorR. E. (2014). Improving reading outcomes for students with or at risk for reading disabilities: A synthesis of the contributions from the Institute of Education Sciences Research Centers (NCSER 2014-3000). Washington, DC: National Center for Special Education Research, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Available from http://ies.ed.gov/
15.
CopelandS. R.KeefeE. B. (2007). Effective literacy instruction for students with moderate or severe disabilities. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
16.
CoyneP.PishaB.DaltonB.ZephL. A.SmithN. C. (2012). Literacy by design: A universal design for learning approach for students with significant intellectual disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 33, 162–172.
17.
FloresM. M.ShippenM. E.AlbertoP.CroweL. (2004). Teaching letter-sound correspondence to students with moderate intellectual disabilities. Journal of Direct Instruction, 4, 173–188.
18.
GrindleC. F.HughesJ. C.SavilleM.HuxleyK.HastingsR. P. (2013). Teaching early reading skills to children with autism using Mimiosprout Early Reading. Behavioral Interventions, 28, 203–224.
19.
HellerK. W.FredrickL. D.TumlinJ.BrinemanD. G. (2002). Teaching decoding for generalization using the nonverbal reading approach. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 14, 19–35.
20.
JosephL. M.SeeryM. E. (2004). Where is the phonics? A review of the literature on the use of phonetic analysis with students with mental retardation. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 88–94.
21.
KagoharaD. M.Van der MeerL.RamdossS.O’ReillyM.LancioniG. E.DavisT. N.. . . SigafoosJ. (2013). Using iPods® and iPads® in teaching programs for individuals with developmental disabilities: A systematic review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 147–156. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2012.07.027
22.
KliewerC. (2008). Joining the literacy flow: Fostering symbol and written language learning in young children with significant developmental disabilities through the four currents of literacy. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 33, 103–121.
23.
LemonsC. J.MrachkoA. A.KostewiczD. E.PaterraM. F. (2012). Effectiveness of decoding and phonological awareness interventions for children with Down Syndrome. Exceptional Children, 79, 67–90.
24.
LeythamP. A.PierceT.BakerJ.MillerS.TandyD. (2015). Evaluation of the nonverbal reading approach for two 12 to 13-year-old students with ASD. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 9, 68–76.
25.
LoniganC. J. (2006). Development, assessment and promotion of preliteracy skills. Early Education and Development, 17, 91–114.
26.
MechlingL. C. (2011). Review of twenty-first century portable electronic devices for persons with moderate intellectual disabilities and autism spectrum disorder. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 46, 479–498.
27.
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction—Reports of the subgroups (NIH Publication No. 00–4754). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
28.
SpectorJ. (2011). Sight word instruction for students with autism: An evaluation of the evidence base. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41, 1411–1422.
29.
SpybrookJ.BloomH.CongdonR.HillC.LiuX.MartinezA.RaudenbushS. (2013). Optimal design plus empirical evidence (Version 3.01) [Software]. Available from hlmsoft.net/od
30.
Swinehart-JonesD.HellerK. (2009). Teaching students with severe speech and physical impairments a decoding strategy using internal speech and motoric indicators. The Journal of Special Education, 43, 131–144. doi:10.1177/0022466908314945
31.
TraversJ. C.HigginsK.PierceT.BooneR.MillerS.TandyR. (2011). Emergent literacy skills of preschool students with autism: A comparison of teacher-led and computer-assisted instruction. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 46, 326–338.
WhalonK. J.Al OtaibaS.DelanoM. E. (2009). Evidence-based reading instruction for individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 24, 3–16.
