The Skills and Needs Inventories in Functional Behavior Assessments and Intervention (SNI-FBAI) was developed and administered to 338 special educators and 28 teaching support staff across seven special education schools in Singapore. The SNI-FBAI was evaluated in terms of its content, face, and construct validity. Internal consistency was also established. Results of the study indicate that the SNI-FBAI is a reliable and valid measure. With the psychometric properties of the SNI-FBAI established, schools are encouraged to use this scale to assist with meeting professional development needs of their special educators and teaching support staff in functional behavior assessments and interventions.
AlbertoP. A.TroutmanC. (2006). Applied behavior analysis for teachers. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
2.
AlterP. J.ConroyM. A.MancilG. R.HaydonT. (2008). A comparison of functional behavior assessment methodologies with young children: Descriptive methods and functional analysis. Journal of Behavioral Education, 17, 200–219.
3.
BlairK. C.FoxL.LentiniR. (2010). Use of positive behavior support to address the challenging behavior of young children within a community early childhood program. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 30, 68–79.
4.
BloodE.NeelR. (2007). From FBA to implementation: A look at what is actually being delivered. Education & Treatment of Children, 30, 67–80.
5.
CarrE. G.DurandV. M. (1985). Reducing behavior problems through functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 111–126.
6.
CarrE. G.LangdonN. A.YarbroughS. (1999). Hypothesis-based intervention for severe problem behavior. In ReppA. C.HornerR. H. (Eds.), Functional analysis of problem behavior: From effective assessment to effective support (pp. 9–31). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
7.
CarterD. R.HornerR. H. (2007). Adding functional behavioral assessment to First Step to Success: A case study. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 9, 229–238.
8.
CooperJ. O.HeronT. E.HewardW. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
9.
CrawfordJ.BrockelB.SchaussS.MiltenbergerR. (1992). A comparison of methods for the functional assessment of stereotypic behavior. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 17, 77–86.
10.
DurandV. M.CarrE. G. (1991). Functional communication training to reduce challenging behaviour: Maintenance and application in new settings. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 251–264.
11.
GableR. A.TonelsonS. W.ShethM. (2012). Importance, usage, and preparedness to implement evidence-based practices for students with emotional disabilities: A comparison of knowledge and skills of special education and general education teachers. Education & Treatment of Children, 35, 499–519.
12.
GreshamF.WatsonT. S.SkinnerC. H. (2001). Functional behavioral assessments: Principles, procedures and future directions. School Psychology Review, 30, 156–172.
13.
HoldenB.GitlesenJ. P. (2006). A total population study of challenging behavior in the county of Hedmark, Norway: Prevalence and risk markers. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 27, 456–465.
IngramK.Lewis-PalmerT.SugaiG. (2005). Function-based intervention planning: Comparing the effectiveness of FBA function-based and non-function-based intervention plans. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 7, 224–236.
17.
JohnstonS.O’NeillR. E. (2001). Searching for effectiveness and efficiency in conducting functional assessments: A review and proposed process for teachers and other practitioners. Focus on Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 16, 205–214.
18.
JonesS.CooperS. A.SmileyE.AllanL.WilliamsonA.MorrisonJ. (2008). Prevalence of, and factors associated with, problem behaviors in adults with intellectual disabilities. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 196, 678–686.
19.
KernL.HiltA.GreshamF. (2004). An evaluation of the functional behavioral assessment process used with students with or at risk for emotional and behavioral disorders. Education & Treatment of Children, 27, 440–452.
20.
LaneK. L.Barton-ArwoodS. M.SpencerJ. L.KalbergJ. R. (2007). Teaching elementary school educators to design, implement, and evaluate functional assessment-based interventions: Successes and challenges. Preventing School Failure, 51(4), 35–46.
21.
MurphyG. H.Beadle-BrownJ.WingL.GouldJ.ShahA.HolmesN. (2005). Chronicity of challenging behaviors in people with severe intellectual disabilities and/or autism: A total population sample. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 35, 405–418.
22.
NewcomerL. L.LewisT. J. (2004). Functional behavioral assessment: An investigation of assessment reliability and effectiveness of function-based interventions. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 12, 168–181.
23.
PindiproluS. S.PetersonS. M.BerglofH. (2007). School personnel’s professional development needs and skill level with functional behavior assessments in ten Midwestern states in the United States: Analysis and issues. Journal of International Association of Special Education, 8, 31–42.
24.
ScottT. M.BucalosA.LiaupsinC.NelsonC. M.JolivetteK.DeSheaL. (2004). Using functional behavior assessment in general education settings: Making a case for effectiveness and efficiency. Behavioral Disorders, 29, 189–201.
25.
ScottT. M.LiaupsinC.NelsonM.McintyreJ. (2005). Team-based functional behavior assessment as a proactive public school process: A descriptive analysis of current barriers. Journal of Behavioral Education, 24, 57–71.
26.
Van AckerR.BoresonL.GableR.PottertonT. (2005). Are we on the right course? Lessons learned about current FBA/BIP practices in schools. Journal of Behavioral Education, 14, 35–56.
27.
WestlingD. L. (2010). Teachers and challenging behavior knowledge, views, and practices. Remedial and Special Education, 31, 48–63.
