Parental Attitudes Toward the Inclusion of Children With Profound Intellectual and Multiple Disabilities in General Primary Education in the Netherlands
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online November, 2015
Parental Attitudes Toward the Inclusion of Children With Profound Intellectual and Multiple Disabilities in General Primary Education in the Netherlands
Despite the growing introduction of inclusive education, children with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities (PIMD) are barely included. Because an underlying factor here may be the attitudes of those directly involved, the present study focuses on the attitude of parents and relating variables concerning experience with individuals with disabilities. A self-report questionnaire was completed by 190 parents of children attending general primary schools in the north of the Netherlands. Although parents showed an overall positive attitude, they were most negative about the inclusion of children with PIMD. In addition, no “experience with individuals with disabilities” was slightly negatively associated with the parents’ attitudes. To overcome barriers of the inclusion of children with PIMD, such as negative parental attitudes, the outcomes of the present study are discussed in the light of possible interventions.
AllportG. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2.
Arthur-KellyM.ForemanP.BennettD.PascoeS. (2008). Interaction, inclusion, and students with profound and multiple disabilities: Towards and agenda for research and practice. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 8, 161–166.
3.
BalboniG.PedrabissiL. (2000). Attitudes of Italian teachers and parents toward school inclusion of students with mental retardation: The role of experience. Education & Training in Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities, 35, 148–159.
4.
BellS. K.MorganS. B. (2000). Children’s attitudes and behavioral intentions toward a peer presented as obese: Does a medical explanation for the obesity make a difference?Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 25, 137–145. doi:10.1093/jpepsy/25.3.137
5.
De BoerA. A.PijlS. J.MinnaertA. E. M. G. (2010). Attitudes of parents towards inclusive education: A review of the literature. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 25, 165–181.
6.
De BoerA. A.PijlS. J.MinnaertA. E. M. G.PostW. J. (2014). Evaluating the effectiveness of an intervention program to influence attitudes of students towards peers with disabilities. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44, 572–583. doi:10.1007/s10803-013-1908-6
7.
De BoerA. A.PijlS. J.PostW. J.MinnaertA. E. M. G. (2012). Which variables relate to the attitudes of teachers, parents, and peers towards students with special educational needs in regular education?Educational Studies, 38, 433–448.
8.
De BoerA. A.TimmermanM. E.PijlS. J.MinnaertA. E. M. G. (2012). The psychometric evaluation of a questionnaire to measure attitudes towards inclusive education. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 27, 573–589.
9.
DowningJ. E.Peckham-HardinK. (2007). Inclusive education: What makes it a good education for students with moderate to severe disabilities?Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 32, 16–30.
10.
EckertT. L.LovettB. J.RosenthalB. D.JiaoJ.RicciL. J.TruckenmillerA. J. (2006). Class-wide instructional feedback: Improving children’s academic skill development. In RandallS. V. (Ed.), Learning disabilities (New research) (pp. 167–185). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers.
11.
EdwardsC. J.CarrS.SiegelW. (2006). Influences of experiences and training on effective teaching practices to meet the needs of diverse learners in schools. Education, 126, 580–592.
12.
FisherM.MeyerL. H. (2002). Development and social competence after two years for students enrolled in inclusive and self-contained educational programs. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 27, 165–174.
13.
ForemanP.Arthur-KellyM.PascoeS.KingB. S. (2004). Evaluating the educational experiences of students with profound and multiple disabilities in inclusive and segregated classroom settings: An Australian perspective. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 29, 183–193.
14.
GodeauE.VignesC.SentenacM.EhlingerV.NavarroF.GrandjeanH.ArnaudC. (2010). Improving attitudes towards children with disabilities in a school context: A cluster randomized intervention study. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 52, 236–242.
15.
HayD. F.PayneA.ChadwickA. (2004). Peer relations in childhood. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45, 84–108.
16.
HuntP.SotoG.MaierJ.DoeringK. (2003). Collaborative teaming to support students at risk and students with severe disabilities in general education classrooms. Exceptional Children, 69, 315–332.
17.
InnesF. K.DiamondK. E. (1999). Typically developing children’s interactions with peers with disabilities: Relationships between mothers’ comments and children’s ideas about disabilities. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 19, 103–111.
18.
KalyvaE.AgaliotisI. (2009). Can contact affect Greek children’s understanding of and attitudes towards peers with physical disabilities?European Journal of Special Needs Education, 24, 213–220. doi:10.1080/08856250902793701
19.
KatzS.ChamielM. (1989). Relationship between children’s ages and parental attitudes, and their attitudes toward a child with a physical disability. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 12, 190–192.
20.
KrahéB.AltwasserC. (2006). Changing negative attitudes towards persons with physical disabilities: An experimental intervention. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 16, 59–69. doi:10.1002/casp.849
21.
LazarusB.CallahanT. (2000). Attitudes towards reading expressed by elementary students diagnosed with learning disabilities. Reading Psychology, 21, 271–282.
22.
LeblancL.RichardsonW.BurnsK. A. (2009). Autism spectrum disorder and the inclusive classroom: Effective training to enhance knowledge of ASD and evidence-based practices. Teacher Education and Special Education, 32, 166–179.
23.
LeyserY.KirkR. (2004). Evaluating inclusion: An examination of parent views and factors influencing their perspectives. International Journal of Disability, Development & Education, 51, 271–285.
24.
MacMillanD. J.MorrisonG. M. (1984). Sociometric research in special education. In JonesR. L. (Ed.), Attitudes and attitude change in special education: Theory and practice (pp. 93–117). Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
25.
MokkenR. J. (1971). A theory and procedure of scale analysis. The Hague, The Netherlands: Mouton.
26.
NakkenH.PijlS. J. (2002). Getting along with classmates in regular schools: A review of the effects of integration on the development of social relationships. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 6, 47–61.
27.
NakkenH.VlaskampC. (2007). A need for a taxonomy for profound intellectual and multiple disabilities. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities, 4, 83–87.
28.
NowickiE. A. (2006). A cross-sectional multivariate analysis of children’s attitudes towards disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 50, 335–348.
29.
PalmerD. S.FullerK.AroraT.NelsonM. (2001). Taking sides: Parent views on inclusion for their children with severe disabilities. Exceptional Children, 67, 467–484.
30.
PaulhusD. L.VazireS. (2010). The self-report method. In RobinsR. W.FraleyR. C.KrugerR. F. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in personality psychology (pp. 224–239). New York, NY: Guilford.
31.
PijlS. J. (2005). Interventies gericht op sociale integratie: Training van sociale vaardigheden voor leerlingen met beperkingen in het reguliere onderwijs [Interventions which aim at social integration: Social skills training for pupils with disabilities in mainstream education]. In van der MeulenB. F.VlaskampC.van den BosK. C. (Eds.), Interventies in de orthopedagogiek [Interventions in Special Needs Education] (pp. 122–135). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Lemniscaat b.v.
32.
RaffertyY.BoettcherC.GriffinK. W. (2001). Benefits and risks of reverse inclusion for preschoolers with and without disabilities: Parents’ perspectives. Journal of Early Intervention, 24, 266–286.
33.
RillottaF.NettelbeckT. (2007). Effects of an awareness program on attitudes of students without an intellectual disability towards persons with an intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 32, 19–27.
34.
ScheepstraA. J. M.NakkenH.PijlS. J. (1999). Contacts with classmates: The social position of pupils with Down’s syndrome in Dutch mainstream education. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 14, 212–220.
35.
SharmaU.ForlinC.LoremanT. (2008). Impact of training on pre-service teachers’ attitudes and concerns about inclusive education and sentiments about persons with disabilities. Disability & Society, 23, 773–785.
36.
SliningerD.SherrillC.JankowskiC. M. (2000). Children’s attitudes toward peers with severe disabilities: Revisiting contact theory. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 17, 176–196.
37.
StoiberK. C.GettingerM.GoetzD. (1998). Exploring factors influencing parents’ and early childhood practitioners’ beliefs about inclusion. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 13, 107–124.
38.
TafaE.ManolitsisG. (2003). Attitudes of Greek parents of typically developing kindergarten children towards inclusive education. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 18, 155–171.
39.
TriandisH. C. (1971). Attitudes measurement and methodology. In TriandisH. C. (Ed.), Attitudes and attitude change (pp. 26–59). New York, NY: John Wiley.
40.
United Nations. (2006). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities and optional protocol. New York, NY: Author.
41.
United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization. (1994). The Salamanca statement and the framework for action on special needs education. Paris, France: Author.
42.
VignesC.ColeyN.GrandjeanH.GodeauE.ArnaudC. (2008). Measuring children’s attitudes towards peers with disabilities: A review of instruments. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology, 50, 182–189.
43.
VlaskampC.PoppesP.ZijlstraR. (2005). Een programma van jezelf: een opvoedingsprogramma voor kinderen met zeer ernstige verstandelijke en meervoudige beperkingen [A program for yourself: An individual educational program for children with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities]. Assen, The Netherlands: Koninklijke Van Gorcum.
44.
WallR. (2002). Teachers’ exposure to people with visual impairments and the effect on attitudes toward inclusion. Re:View, 34(3), 111–120.
45.
WardJ. (2006). Review of inclusion in action. Educational Psychology, 26, 595–598.
46.
WarnockM. (1979). Children with special needs: The Warnock Report. British Medical Journal, 1, 667–668.
47.
WeaverA. D.ByersK. S.SearsH. A.CohenJ. N.RandallH. E. S. (2002). Sexual health education at school and at home: Attitudes and experiences of New Brunswick parents. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 11(1), 19–32.
48.
WehmeyerM. L.LeeS. H. (2007). Educating children with intellectual disability and autism-spectrum disorders. In CarrA.O’ReillyG.WalshP. N.McEvoyJ.McEvoyJ. (Eds.), The handbook of intellectual disability and clinical psychology practice (pp. 559–605). New York, NY: Routledge.
49.
WendtL. H. (1999). A survey of regular education teachers’ attitudes toward their included students. Humanities and Social Sciences, 60, 343.
50.
YudeC.GoodmanR.McConachieH. (1998). Peer problems of children with hemiplegia in mainstream primary schools. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines, 39, 533–541.
