While experiences of students with disabilities transitioning from high school to college have been well documented, the influence exerted by selected factors on these experiences is less well understood. Using data from the Education Longitudinal Study of 2002, the influence of selected risk and resilience factors on the short-term postsecondary educational outcomes, that is, persistence, of adolescents with specific learning disabilities or emotional/behavioral disorders was examined. A logistic model revealed group differences between individuals with disabilities and peers without disabilities. All selected risk and resilience factors significantly predicted educational persistence. No significant differences were observed between adolescents with specific learning disabilities or emotional/behavioral disorders, but three factors—grade point average, socioeconomic status, and number of friends having plans to attend a 4-year college—were significant predictors of educational persistence for adolescents with disabilities. Implications of these findings are discussed.
BarkleyR. A. (2006). Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: A handbook for diagnosis and treatment (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford.
2.
BergerJ. B.LyonS. C. (2005). Past to present: A historical look at retention. In SeidmanA. (Ed.), College student retention: Formula for stuent success (pp. 1-30). Westport, CT: Praeger.
3.
BlackorbyJ.WagnerM. (1996). Longitudinal postschool outcomes of youth with disabilities: Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study. Exceptional Children, 62, 399–413.
4.
BozickR.LyttleT.SiegelP. H.IngelsS. J.RogersJ. E.LauffE.PlantyM. (2006). Education Longitudinal Study of 2002: First follow-up transcript component data file documentation (NCES 2006–338). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
5.
BrownS. D.TramayneS.HoxhaD.TelanderK.FanX.LentR. W. (2008). Social cognitive predictors of college students’ academic performance and persistence: A meta-analytic path analysis. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72, 298–308. doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2007.09.003
6.
ChenR.St. JohnE. P. (2011). State financial policies and college student persistence: A national study. The Journal of Higher Education, 82, 629–660. doi:10.1353/jhe.2011.0032
7.
CosdenM. A.BrownC.ElliottK. (2002). Development of self-understanding and self-esteem in children and adults with learning disabilities. In WongB. Y. L.MavisM. L. (Eds.), The social dimensions of learning disabilities: Essays in honor of Tanis Bryan (pp. 33–51). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
8.
CosdenM. A.McNamaraJ. (1997). Self-concept and perceived social support among college students with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 20, 2–12. doi:10.2307/1511087
9.
DaDeppoL. M. W. (2009). Integration factors related to the academic success and intent to persist of college students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 24, 122–131. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2009.00286.x
10.
DietzS.MontagueM. (2006). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder comorbid with emotional and behavioral disorders and learning disabilities in adolescents. Exceptionality, 14, 19–33. doi:10.1207/s15327035ex1401_3
11.
FabianE. S.LiesenerJ. J. (2005). Promoting the career potential of youth with disabilities. In BrownS. D.LentR. W. (Eds.), Career development and counseling: Putting theory and research to work (pp. 551–572). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
12.
GetzelE. E. (2008). Addressing the persistence and retention of students with disabilities in higher education: Incorporating key strategies and supports on campus. Exceptionality, 16, 207–219. doi:10.1080/0936283080241
13.
GoldbergR. J.HigginsE. L.RaskindM. H.HermanK. L. (2003). Predictors of success in individuals with learning disabilities: A qualitative analysis of a 20-year longitudinal study. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 222–236. doi:10.1111/1540-5826.00077
14.
GreggN. (2009). Adolescents and adults with learning disabilities and ADHD: Assessment and accommodation. New York, NY: Guilford.
15.
HallahanD. P.KauffmanJ. M.PullenP. C. (2012). Exceptional learners: Introduction to special education (12th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
16.
HeathN.RobertsE.TosteJ. R. (2011). Perceptions of academic performance: Positive illusions in adolescents with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46, 402–412. doi:10.1177/0022219411428807
17.
HodappR. M.KrasnerD. V. (1994–1995). Reflections on “Using large, national data bases in special education research.”Exceptionality, 5, 103–108. doi:10.1207/s15327035ex0502_4
18.
IngelsS. J.PrattD. J.WilsonD.BurnsL. J.CurrivanD.RogersJ. E.Hubbard-BednaszS. (2007). Education Longitudinal Study of 2002: Base-year to second follow-up data file documentation. (NCES 2008-347). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
19.
IngelsS. J.ScottL. A. (1993). Exclusion of students with barriers to participation in NELS:88—Baseline excluded students two and four years later. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED360371)
20.
KaplanB. J.DeweyD. M.CrawfordS. G.WilsonB. N. (2001). The term comorbidity is of questionable value in reference to developmental disorders: Data and theory. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 555–565. doi:10.1177/002221940103400608
21.
KorteringL. J.BrazielP. M.McClannonT. W. (2010). Career ambitions: A comparison of youth with and without SLD. Remedial and Special Education, 31, 230–240. doi:10.1177/0741932508324404
22.
LentR. W.BrownS. D.HackettG. (1994). Toward a unifying cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance [Monograph]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45, 79–122. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1994.1027
23.
LindstromL.DorenB.MieschJ. (2011). Waging a living: Career development and long-term employment outcomes for young adults with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 77, 423–434.
MadausJ. W. (2006). Employment outcomes of university graduates with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 29, 19–31. doi:10.2307/30035529
26.
MadausJ. W.GerberP. J.PriceL. A. (2008). Adults with LD in the workforce: Lessons for secondary transition programs. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 23, 148–153.doi:10.1111/j.1540-5826.2008.00272
27.
MamiseishviliK.KochL. C. (2011). First-to-second-year persistence of students with disabilities in postsecondary institutions in the United States. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 54, 93–105. doi:10.1177/0034355210382580
28.
MayA. L.StoneC. A. (2010). Stereotypes of individuals with learning disabilities: Views of college students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 483–499. doi:10.1177/0022219409355483
29.
McDonnallM. C.CavenaughB. S.GiesenJ. M. (2012). The relationship between parental involvement and mathematics achievement for students with visual impairments. The Journal of Special Education, 45, 204–215. doi:10.1177/0022466910365169
30.
MorrisonG. M.CosdenM. A. (1997). Risk, resilience, and adjustment of individuals with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 20, 43–60. doi:10.2307/1511092
31.
MpofuE.HarleyD. A. (2006). Racial and disability identity: Implications for the career counseling of African Americans with disabilities. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin, 50, 14–23. doi:10.1177/00343552060500010301
32.
MurrayC. (2003). Risk factors, protective factors, vulnerability, and resilience: A framework for understanding and supporting the adult transitions of youth with high-incidence disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 16–26. doi:10.1177/074193250302400102
33.
MurrayC.GoldsteinD. E.NourseS.EdgarE. (2000). The postsecondary school attendance and completion rates of high school graduates with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Research & Practice, 15, 119–127. doi:10.1207/SLDRP1503_1
34.
NewmanL.WagnerM.CametoR.KnokeyA. (2009). The post-high school outcomes of youth with disabilities up to 4 years after high school: A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study–2 (NLTS2). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
ReschlyA. L.ChristensonS. L. (2006). Prediction of dropout among students with mild disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 27, 276–292. doi:10.1177/07419325060270050301
37.
RojewskiJ. W.LeeI. H.GreggN. (2013). Intermediate work outcomes for adolescents with high-incidence disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/2165143412473352
38.
SabornieE. J.CullinanD.OsborneS. S.BrockL. B. (2005). Intellectual, academic, and behavioral functioning of students with high-incidence disabilities: A cross-categorical meta-analysis. Exceptional Children, 72, 47–63.
39.
SabornieE. J.EvansC.CullinanD. (2006). Comparing characteristics of high-incidence disability groups. Remedial and Special Education, 27, 95–104. doi:10.1177/07419325060270020701
40.
ScottJ. G. (2000). Social network analysis: A handbook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
41.
SeoY.AbbottR. D.HawkinsJ. D. (2008). Outcome status of students with learning disabilities at ages 21 and 24. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41, 300–314. doi:10.1177/0022219407311308
42.
SnyderT. D.DillowS. A. (2012). Digest of education statistics 2011 (NCES 2012-001). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
43.
TestD. W.MazzottiV. L.MustianA. L.FowlerC. H.KorteringL.KohlerP. (2009). Evidence-based secondary transition predictors for improving postschool outcomes for students with disabilities. Career Development and Transition for Exceptional Individuals, 32, 160–181. doi:10.1177/0885728809346960
44.
TintoV. (1987). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
45.
TintoV. (1992). Student attrition and retention. In ClarkB. R.NeaveG. R. (Eds.), The encyclopedia of higher education (pp. 1697–1709). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
46.
WagnerM.NewmanL.CametoR.GarzaN.LevineP. (2005). After high school: A first look at the postschool experiences of youth with disabilities. A report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study–2. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED494935)
47.
WesselR. D.JonesJ. A.MarkleL.WestfallC. (2009). Retention and graduation of students with disabilities: Facilitating student success. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 21, 116–125.
48.
WongB. Y. L. (2003). General and specific issues for researchers’ consideration in applying the risk and resilience framework to the social domain of learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 68–76. doi:10.2307/1511092
