Although quality of the teacher–student relationship contributes to school adjustment, students who experience difficulties appear to be least likely to benefit from positive interactions with their teachers. It was of interest to explore a broadened conceptualization of teacher–student relationship that considers both emotional connection and collaborative partnership—classroom working alliance—among students with high-incidence disabilities. This study sought to examine ratings of classroom working alliance for students with and without disabilities, as well as the interaction of disability status with teacher- or student-rated alliance variables in predicting school-related outcomes. Results revealed that teachers had more negative perceptions of their alliances with students with disabilities. Strong working alliance, as rated by the teacher, predicted positive social and behavioral outcomes for all students. Furthermore, students’ ratings of the collaborative elements of alliance were found to predict greater academic competence and school satisfaction for students with disabilities when compared with their peers.
AinsworthM. S.BowlbyJ. (1991). An ethnological approach to personality development. American Psychologist, 46, 333–341. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.46.4.333
2.
Al-YagonM.MikulincerM. (2004) Socio-emotional and academic adjustment among children with learning disorders: The mediational role of attachment based factors. Journal of Special Education, 38, 11–123. doi:10.1177/00224669040380020501
3.
AnanR. M.BarnettD. (1999). Perceived social support mediates between prior attachment and subsequent adjustment: A study of urban African American children. Developmental Psychology, 35, 1210–1222. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.35.5.1210
4.
AudS.HussarW.JohnsonF.KenaG.RothE.ManningE. . . . ZhangJ. (2012). The condition of education 2012 (NCES 2012-045). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch
5.
Australian Council for Educational Research. (2003). School Life Questionnaire. Unpublished measure.
6.
BakerJ. A. (1999). Teacher-student interaction in urban at-risk classrooms: Differential behavior, relationship quality, and student satisfaction with school. Elementary School Journal, 100, 57–70. doi:10.1086/461943
7.
BakerJ. A. (2006). Contributions of teacher-child relationships to positive school adjustment during elementary school. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 211–229. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2006.02.002
8.
BakerJ. A.DillyL. J.AupperleeJ. L.PatilS. A. (2003). The developmental context of school satisfaction: Schools as psychologically healthy environments. School Psychology Quarterly, 18, 206–221. doi:10.1521/scpq.18.2.206.21861
9.
BerryD.O’ConnorE. (2010). Behavioral risk, teacher-child relationships, and social skill development across middle childhood: A child-by-environment analysis of change. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 31, 1–14. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2009.05.001
10.
BirchS. H.LaddG. W. (1998). Children’s interpersonal behaviors and teacher-child relationships. Developmental Psychology, 34, 934–946. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.34.5.934
11.
BryanT. (2005). The applicability of the risk and resilience model to social problems of students with learning disabilities: Response to Bernice Wong. Learning Disabilities: Research & Practice, 18, 94–98.
12.
BryanT.BursteinK.ErgulC. (2004). The social-emotional side of learning disabilities: A science-based presentation of the state of the art. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 27, 45–51.
13.
CookB. G.CameronD. L. (2010). Inclusive teachers’ concern and rejection toward their students. Remedial and Special Education, 31, 67–76. doi:10.1177/0741932508324402
14.
CroningerR. G.LeeV. E. (2001). Social capital and dropping out of high school: Benefits to at-risk students of teachers’ support and guidance. Teachers College Record, 103, 548–581. doi:10.1111/0161-4681.00127
15.
DavisH. A. (2007). Exploring the contexts of relationship quality between middle school students and teachers. Elementary School Journal, 106, 193–233. doi:10.1086/501483
16.
DeckerD. M.DonaD. P.ChristensonS. L. (2007). Behaviorally at-risk African American students: The importance of student-teacher relationships for student outcomes. Journal of School Psychology, 45, 83–109. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2006.09.004
17.
DeshlerD. (2005). Adolescents with learning disabilities: Unique challenges and reasons for hope. Learning Disability Quarterly, 28, 122–125.
18.
FurrerC.SkinnerE. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children’s academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 148–162. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.148
19.
GreshamF. M.ElliottS. N. (2008). Social Skills Improvement System: Rating scales manual. Minneapolis, MN: Pearson Assessments.
20.
HamreB. K.PiantaR. C. (2001). Early teacher-child relationships and the trajectory of children’s school outcomes through eighth grade. Child Development, 72, 625–638. doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00301
21.
HamreB. K.PiantaR. C. (2005). Can instructional and emotional support in the first-grade classroom make a difference for children at risk of school failure?Child Development, 76, 949–967. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2005.00889.x
HenricssonL.RydellA.-M. (2004). Elementary school children with behavior problems: Teacher-child relations and self-perception. A prospective study. Merrill Palmer Quarterly, 50, 111–138. doi:10.1353/mpq.2004.0012
24.
HorvathA. O.BediR. P. (2002). The alliance. In NorcrossJ. C. (Ed.), Psychotherapy relationships that work: Therapist contributions and responsiveness to patients (pp. 37–70). New York,NY: Oxford University Press.
25.
HorvathA. O.GreenbergL. S. (1989). Development and validation of the working alliance inventory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 36, 223–233. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.36.2.223
26.
HuebnerE. S.McCulloughG. (2000). Correlates of school satisfaction among adolescents. Journal of Educational Research, 93, 281–292. doi:10.1080/00220670009598725
27.
KauffmanJ. M.LandrumT. J. (2009). Characteristics of emotional and behavioral disorders of children and youth. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
28.
KempS. E. (2006). Dropout policies and trends for students with and without disabilities. Adolescence, 41, 235–250.
29.
KeoghB. K.WeisnerT. (1993). An ecocultural perspective on risk and protective factors in children’s development: Implications for learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 8, 3–10. Retrieved from http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/bpl/ldrp
30.
KlemA. M.ConnellJ. P. (2004). Relationships matter: Linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement. Journal of School Health, 74, 262–273. doi:10.1111/j.1746-1561.2004.tb08283.x
31.
LaneK. L.CarterE. W.PiersonM. R.GlaeserB. C. (2006). Academic, social, and behavioural characteristics of high school students with emotional disturbances or learning disabilities. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 14, 108–117.
32.
MastenA. S.BestK. M.GarmezyN. (1990). Resilience and development: Contributions from the study of children who overcame adversity. Development and Psychopathology, 2, 425–444. doi:10.1017/S0954579400005812
33.
MerrellK. W.GimpelG. A. (1998). Social skills of children and adolescents: Conceptualization, assessment, treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
34.
Ministère de l’Éducation du Loisir et du Sport Gouvernement du Québec. (2007). Organization of educational services for at-risk students and students with handicaps, social maladjustments or learning difficulties. Retrieved from http://www.mels.gouv.qc.ca
35.
MontagueM.RinaldiC. (2001). Classroom dynamics and children at risk: A followup. Learning Disability Quarterly, 24, 75–83. doi:10.2307/1511063
36.
MurrayC. (2009). Parent and teacher relationships as predictors of school engagement and functioning among low-income urban youth. Journal of Early Adolescence, 29, 376–404.
37.
MurrayC.GreenbergM. T. (2001). Relationships with teachers and bonds with school: Social emotional adjustment correlates for children with and without disabilities. Psychology in the Schools, 38, 25–41. doi:10.1002/1520-6807(200101)38:1<25::AID-PITS4>3.0.CO;2-C
38.
MurrayC.MurrayK. M. (2004). Child level correlates of teacher-student relationships: An examination of child demographic characteristics, academic orientations and behavioral orientations. Psychology in the Schools, 41, 751–762.
39.
MurrayC.NaranjoJ. (2008). Poor, black, learning disabled, and graduating. Remedial and Special Education, 29, 145–160. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2007.10.006
40.
MurrayC.PiantaR. C. (2007). The importance of teacher-student relationships for adolescents with high-incidence disabilities. Theory Into Practice, 46, 105–112.
NorcrossJ. C. (2002). Psychotherapy relationships that work. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
43.
PiantaR. C. (1999). Enhancing relationships between children and teachers. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
44.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S.CheongY. F.CongdonR.du ToitM. (2004). HLM 6: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
45.
ReschleyA. L.ChristensonS. L. (2006). Prediction of dropout among students with mild disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 27, 276–292.
46.
ShawL. R.McMahonB. T.ChanF. C.HannoldE. (2004). Enhancement of the working alliance: A training program to align counselor and consumer expectations. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 20, 107–125. Retrieved from http://www.iospress.nl/loadtop/load.php?isbn=10522263
47.
SolesT.BloomE. L.HeathN. L.KaragiannakisA. (2008). An exploration of teachers’ current perceptions of children with emotional and behavioural difficulties. Emotional & Behavioural Difficulties, 13, 275–290.
48.
SteinbergZ.KnitzerJ. (1990) How to look and what to ask: Improving the classroom life of children with behavioral and emotional disorders. Preventing School Failure, 34, 4–10. Retrieved from http://www.heldref.org/pubs/psf/about.html
49.
StockardJ.MayberryM. (1992). Effective educational environments. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin.
50.
TosteJ. R.HeathN. L.ConnorC. M. (2011). The construct validity of the Classroom Working Alliance Inventory (CWAI). Manuscript in preparation.
51.
TosteJ. R.HeathN. L.DallaireL. (2010). Perceptions of classroom working alliance and student performance. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 56, 371–387. Retrieved from http://ajer.synergiesprairies.ca/
52.
TournakiN. (2003). Effect of student characteristics on teachers’ predictions of student success. Journal of Educational Research, 96, 310–319. doi:10.1080/00220670309597643
53.
TraceyT. J.KokotovicA. M. (1989). Factor structure of the Working Alliance Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 1, 207–210. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.1.3.207
54.
Tur-KaspaH.BryanT. (1994). Social information-processing skills of students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 9, 12–23.Retrieved from http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/bpl/ldrp
55.
VaughnS.BosC. S. (2009). Strategies for teaching students with learning and behavior problems (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
56.
WentzelK. R. (1994). Relations of social goal pursuit to social acceptance, classroom behavior, and perceived social support. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 173–182. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.86.2.173
57.
WernerE.SmithR. (1989). Vulnerable but invincible: A longitudinal study of resilient children and youth. New York, NY: Adams, Bannister, and Cox.
58.
WhitleyJ.RawanaE. P.BrownleeK.RawanaJ. (2010). A longitudinal exploration of the academic and psychosocial outcomes of students with emotional/behavioural difficulties: The importance of student perceptions of themselves, their peer relationships, and their classrooms. Brock Education Journal, 19, 78–96.
59.
WongB. Y. L.DonahueM. (2002). The social dimensions of learning disabilities: Essays in honor of Tanis Bryan. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
