Recent legislative and school reform efforts require schools to evaluate and improve educational practices for students with severe disabilities. The authors developed the Program Quality Measurement Tool (PQMT) to enable administrators and educators to evaluate the educational programming provided to students with severe disabilities against best practice indicators, identify programmatic strengths and needs, and assess improvements in educational service delivery over time. The PQMT incorporates a multimethod approach to assessing inclusive practices for students with severe disabilities at the levels of the local education agency, school building, and student. The results indicate acceptable levels of interobserver agreement, test-retest reliability, internal consistency, congruent validity, and discriminative validity for the PQMT.
Ayres, B.J., Meyer, L.H., Erevelles, N., & Park-Lee, S. (1994). Easy for you to say: Teacher perspectives on implementing most promising practices. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 19, 84-93.
2.
Brinker, R.P. (1985). Interactions between severely mentally retarded students and other students in integrated and segregated public school settings . American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 89, 587-594.
3.
Browder, D.M. (2001). Curriculum and assessment for students with moderate and severe disabilities. New York: Guilford.
4.
Browder, D.M., & Cooper-Duffy, K. (2003). Evidence-based practices for students with severe disabilities and the requirement for accountability in "No Child Left Behind." Journal of Special Education, 37, 157-163.
5.
Burstein, N., Sears, S., Wilcoxen, A., Cabello, B., & Spagna, M. (2004). Moving toward inclusive practices. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 104-116.
6.
Carter, E.W., Cushing, L.S., Clark, N.M., & Kennedy, C.H. (2005). Effects of peer support interventions on students' access to the general curriculum and social interactions. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 30, 15-25.
7.
Carter, E.W., & Hughes, C. (2005). Increasing social interaction among adolescents with intellectual disabilities and their general education peers: Effective interventions. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 30, 179-193.
8.
Carter, E.W., Hughes, C., Guth, C., & Copeland, S.R. (2005). Factors influencing social interaction among high school students with intellectual disabilities and their general education peers. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 110, 366-377.
9.
Center on Human Policy. (1987). Determining the extent of current inclusion/LRE checklist. Boston: TAPP Project.
10.
Clark, N.M., Cushing, L.S., & Kennedy, C.H. (2004). An intensive onsite technical assistance model to promote inclusive educational practices for students with disabilities in middle school and high school. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 29, 253-262.
11.
Council for Exceptional Children. (2003). What every special educator must know: Ethics, standards, and guidelines for special educators (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: Author.
12.
Deppeler, J., & Harvey, D. (2004). Validating the British Index for Inclusion for the Australian context: Stage one. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 8, 155-184.
13.
Downing, J.E. (2002). Including students with severe and multiple disabilities in typical classrooms: Practical strategies for teachers (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
14.
Dymond, S.K. (2001). A participatory action research approach to evaluating inclusive school programs. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 16, 54-63.
15.
Educational Testing Service. (2005). Praxis series: Professional assessments for beginning teachers. Princeton, NJ: Author.
16.
Eichinger, J., & Downing, J. (1992). An administrator and teacher perspective on program quality indicators for students with severe disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 17, 213-217.
17.
Fisher, M., & Meyer, L.H. (2002). Development and social competence after two years for students enrolled in inclusive and self-contained educational programs . Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities , 27, 165-174.
18.
Foreman, P., Arthur-Kelly, M., Pascoe, S., & King B.S. (2004). Evaluating the educational experiences of students with profound and multiple disabilities in inclusive and segregated classroom settings: An Australian perspective. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 29, 183-193.
19.
Fox, T., & Williams, W. (1991). Implementing best practices for all students in their local school. Burlington: Center for Developmental Disabilities, University of Vermont.
20.
Freeman, S.F.N., & Alkin, M.C. (2000). Academic and social attainments of children with mental retardation in general education and special education settings. Remedial and Special Education, 21, 3-18.
21.
Fryxell, D., & Kennedy, C.H. (1995). Placement along the continuum of services and its impact on students' social relationships. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 20, 259-269.
22.
Giangreco, M.F., Cloninger, C.J., & Iverson, V.S. (1993). Choosing outcomes and accommodations for children: A guide to planning inclusive education. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
23.
Giangreco, M.F., Cloninger, C.J., & Iverson, V.S. (1998). Choosing outcomes and accommodations for children: A guide to educational planning for students with disabilities (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
24.
Guskey, T.R. (2002). Does it make a difference? Evaluating professional development. Educational Leadership, 59(6), 45-51.
25.
Halvorsen, A., Neary, T., & Smithey, L. (1991). Implementation site criteria for full inclusion programs. Sacramento: PEERS Project, California State Department of Education.
26.
Halvorsen, A., Smithey, L., Neary, T., & Gilbert, S. (1992). Integration/inclusion needs assessment. Sacramento: PEERS Project, California State Department of Education.
27.
Harvey, M.T., May, M.E., & Kennedy, C.H. (2004). Nonconcurrent multiple baseline designs and the evaluation of educational systems. Journal of Behavioral Education , 13, 267-276.
28.
Horner, R.H., Carr, E.G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165-179.
29.
Hunt, P., Farron-Davis, F., Beckstead, S., Curtis, D., & Goetz, L. (1994). Evaluating the effects of the placement of students with severe disabilities in general education versus special education classes . Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps , 19, 200-214.
30.
Hunt, P., Goetz, L., & Anderson, J. (1986). IEP quality indicators instrument. San Francisco: California Research Institute, San Francisco State University.
31.
Hunt, P., Soto, G., Maier, J., & Doering, K. (2003). Collaborative teaming to support students at risk and students with severe disabilities in general education classrooms. Exceptional Children, 69, 315-332.
32.
Hunt, P., Staub, D., Alwell, M., & Goetz, L. (1994). Achievement by all students within the context of cooperative learning groups. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 19, 290-301.
33.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, 20 U.S.C. ยง 1400 et seq. (2004) (reauthorization of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1990)
34.
Jackson, L., Ryndak, D.L., & Billingsley, F. (2000). Useful practices in inclusive education: A preliminary view of what experts in moderate to severe disabilities are saying. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 25, 129-141.
Kennedy, C.H., Cushing, L.S., & Itkonen, T. (1997). General education participation improves the social contacts and friendship networks of students with severe disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 7, 167-189.
37.
Kennedy, C.H., & Horn, E.M. (2004). Including students with severe disabilities. Boston: Pearson.
38.
Kennedy, C.H., Shukla, S., & Fryxell, D. (1997). Comparing the effects of educational placement on the social relationships of intermediate school students with severe disabilities . Exceptional Children, 64, 31-47.
39.
Kleinert, H.L., & Kearns, J.F. (1999). A validation study of the performance indicators and learning outcomes of Kentucky's alternate assessment for students with significant disabilities. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 24, 100-110.
40.
Klingner, J.K., Ahwee, S., Pilonieta, P., & Menendez, R. (2003). Barriers and facilitators in scaling up research-based practices. Exceptional Children, 69, 411-429.
41.
Long, T., Wallis, T., & Kennedy, C.H. (2004). Reliability and validity of the TCAP-Alt Direct Observation/Interview. Unpublished raw data.
42.
McDonnell, J., Mathot-Buckner, C., Thornson, N., & Fister, S. (2001). Supporting the inclusion of students with moderate and severe disabilities in junior high school general education classes: The effects of classwide peer tutoring, multi-element curriculum, and accommodations . Education and Treatment of Children, 24, 141-160.
43.
Meyer, L.H. (1987). Program Quality Indicators: A checklist of most promising practices in educational programs for students with severe disabilities . Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University, Division of Special Education and Rehabilitation.
44.
Meyer, L.H. (2003). Wanted: Internationally appropriate best practices . Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities , 28, 33-36.
45.
Meyer, L.H., Eichinger, J., & Downing, J. (1992). Program Quality Indicators (PQI): A checklist of most promising practices in educational programs for students with severe disabilities (Rev. ed.). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University, Division of Special Education and Rehabilitation.
46.
Montie, J., Vandercook, T., York, J., Flower, D., Johnson, S., & MacDonald, C. (1992). Inclusion practice priorities instrument. Minneapolis, MN: Achieving Membership Program. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 364040)
47.
No Child Left Behind Act, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).
48.
Odom, S.L., Brantlinger, E., Gersten, R., Horner, R.H., Thompson, B., & Harris, K.R. (2005). Research in special education: Scientific methods and evidence-based practices. Exceptional Children, 71, 137-148.
49.
Odom, S.L., Klingerman, K., & Jakowski, M. (2004). Investigating inclusion: A review of research methods for individuals with intellectual disability. In E. Emerson, C. Hatton, T. Thompson, & T. R. Parmenter (Eds.), The international handbook of applied research in intellectual disabilities (pp. 281-295). West Sussex , UK: Wiley.
50.
President's Commission on Excellence in Special Education (2002). A new era: Revitalizing special education for children and their families. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
51.
Ryndak, D.L., & Alper, S. (2003). Curriculum and instruction for students with significant disabilities in inclusive settings (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
52.
Ryndak, D. L., & Fisher, D. (Eds.). (2003). The foundations of inclusive education: A compendium of articles on effective strategies to achieve inclusive education (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: TASH.
53.
Ryndak, D.L., Jackson, L., & Billingsley, F. (1999/2000). Defining school inclusion for students with moderate to severe disabilities: What do experts say? Exceptionality, 8, 101-116.
54.
Ryndak, D.L., & Kennedy, C.H. (2000). Meeting the needs of students with severe disabilities: Issues and practices in teacher education. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 25, 69-71.
55.
Salisbury, C.L., & McGregor, G. (2002). The administrative climate and context of inclusive elementary schools. Exceptional Children, 68, 259-274.
56.
Scruggs, T.E., & Mastropieri, M.A. (1995). What makes special education special? Evaluating inclusion programs with the PASS variables. Journal of Special Education, 29, 224-233.
57.
Simpson, R.L. (2004). Inclusion of students with behavior disorders in general education settings: Research and measurement issues. Behavioral Disorders, 30, 19-31.
58.
Sindelar, P.T., Shearer, D.K., Yendol-Hoppey, D., & Liebert, T.W. (2006). The sustainability of inclusive school reform . Exceptional Children, 72, 317-331.
59.
Smith, A. (2003). Scientifically based research and evidence-based education: A federal policy context. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 28, 126-132.
60.
Snell, M.E. (2003). Applying research to practice: The more pervasive problem? Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities , 28, 143-147.
61.
Snell, M.E., & Brown, F. (2000). Instruction of students with severe disabilities (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
62.
Turner, M.D., Baldwin, L., Kleinert, H.L., & Kearns, J.F. (2000). The relation of a statewide alternate assessment for students with severe disabilities to other measures of instructional effectiveness . Journal of Special Education, 34, 69-76.
63.
U.S.DepartmentofEducation. (2003). Twenty-fifth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the individuals with disabilities education act. Washington, DC: Author.
64.
Vaughn, S., Schumm, J., & Brick, J. (1998). Using a rating scale to design and evaluate inclusive programs. Teaching Exceptional Children, 30(4), 41-45.
65.
Wallace, T., Anderson, A.R., Bartholomay, T., & Hupp, S. (2002). An ecobehavioral examination of high school classrooms that include students with disabilities. Exceptional Children , 68, 345-359.
66.
Williamson, P., McLeskey, J., Hoppey, D., & Rentz, T. (2006). Educating students with mental retardation in general education classrooms. Exceptional Children, 72, 347-361.
