Importance of Student Social Behavior in the Mission Statements,Personnel Preparation Standards,and Innovation Efforts of State Departments of Education
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online February, 2007
Importance of Student Social Behavior in the Mission Statements,Personnel Preparation Standards,and Innovation Efforts of State Departments of Education
We examined the extent to which state departments of education are including (a) goals for student social behavior in their mission statements; (b) criteria for individual student, classroom, and schoolwide behavior support in certification standards for general education teachers, special education teachers, and principals; and (c) state initiatives focused on improving student social behavior. Web-based information from state departments of education from all 50 states and from the District of Columbia were reviewed in the fall of 2004. Results indicated that only 16 states (31%) include a focus on student social behavior in their mission statements. Individual student behavior support practices were identified in the curriculum for general educators in 30 (59%) states and for special educators in 39 (76%) states. Classroom behavior support practices were required for general education teachers in 39 (76%) states and for special educators in 40 (78%) states. Schoolwide behavior support practices were most likely to be required for principal certification, and they were formally identified in 20 (39%) of the states surveyed. Character education was the most common state initiative cited for improving social behavior in schools.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Beach Center. (2005, Winter). Schoolwide PBS and academic achievement: Is there a connection? Beach Center on DisabilityQuarterly Newsletter2, 6-8.
2.
Carnine, D. (1997). Bridging the research-to-practice gap. Exceptional Children, 63, 513—521.
3.
Colvin, G., & Fernandez, E. (2000). Sustaining effective behavior support systems in an elementary school. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions , 2, 251—253.
4.
Colvin, G., Kame'enui, E., & Sugai, G. (1993). Reconceptualizing behavior management and school-wide discipline in general education. Education & Treatment of Children, 16, 361—381.
5.
Colvin, G., & Sugai, G. (1988). Proactive strategies for managing social behavior problems: An instructional approach. Education & Treatment of Children, 11(4), 341—348.
6.
Cook, B.G., Landrum, T.J., Tankersley, M., & Kauffman, J.M. (2003). Bringing research to bear on practice: Effecting evidence-based instruction for students with emotional or behavioral disorders. Education & Treatment of Children , 26(4), 345—361.
7.
Crone, D.A., & Horner, R.H. (2003). Building positive behavior support systems in schools: Functional behavioral assessment. New York: Guilford Press.
8.
Drasgow, E., & Yell, M.L. (2002). Schoolwide behavior support: Legal implications and requirements. Child & FamilyBehavior Therapy, 24, 129—145.
9.
Freeman, R., Smith, C., Zarcone, J., Kimbrough, P., Tieght-Benet, M., Wick-ham, D., et al. (2005). Building a state-wide plan for embedding positive behavior support in human service organizations. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 7(2), 109—119.
10.
Fullan, M.G., & Miles, M.B. (1992). Getting reform right: What works and what doesn't . Phi Delta Kappan,73(10), 744—751.
11.
Gottfredson, D.C., Gottfredson, G.D., & Hybl, L.G. (1993). Managing adolescent behavior: A multiyear, multischool study. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 179—215.
12.
Grisham-Brown, J., Collins, B.C., & Baird, C. (2000). Training rural educators in Kentucky: Impact with follow-up data. 2000 Conference Proceedings of the American Council for Rural Special Education. Kansas, KY: ACRES.
13.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1990, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (1990)(amended 1997)
14.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 31 U.S.C.
15.
Kern, L., Choutka, C.M., & Sokol, N.G. (2002). Assessment-based antecedent interventions used in natural settings to reduce challenging behavior: A review of the literature . Education & Treatment of Children, 25, 113—130.
16.
Latham, G. (1988). The birth and death cycles of educational innovations . Principal, 68(1), 41—43.
17.
Lewis, T.J., & Sugai, G. (1999). Effective behavior support: A systems approach to proactive schoolwide management. Focus onExceptional Children , 31(6), 1—24.
18.
Louis, K.S., & Miles, M.B. (1990). Mustering the will and skill for change. Educational Leadership, 47(8), 57—61.
Moldenhauer-Salazar. J.C. (2000). Visions and missions: A case study of organizational change and diversity in higher education. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering, 61(2-B), 1120.
21.
Nelson, J.R., Martella, R., & Marchand-Martella, N. (2002). Maximizing student learning: The effects of a comprehensive school-based program for preventing problem behaviors. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 10(3), 136—148.
22.
Netzel, D.M., & Eber, L. (2003). Shifting from reactive to proactive discipline in an urban school district: A change of focus through PBIS implementation . Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 5(2), 71—79.
23.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. 70 § 6301 et seq. (2002). Safe and drug-free schools. Retrieved November 1, 2003, from www.ed .gov/nclb/overview
24.
Salzberg, C.L., Lignugaris-Kraft, B., & Monson, J. (1997). A voluntary approach to collaborative teacher preparation: A dual major program at Utah State University. In L. Blanton, C. Griffin, J. Winn, & M. Pugach (Eds.), Teacher education in transition: Collaborative programs to prepare general and special educators (pp. 207—230). Denver: Love.
25.
Scott, T.M., & Barrett, S.B. (2004). Using staff and student time engaged in disciplinary procedures to evaluate the impact of school-wide PBS. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 6, 21—28.
26.
Snell, M., Martin, K., & Orelove, F. (1997). Meeting the demands for specialized teachers of students with severe disabilities. Teacher Education and Special Education, 20, 221—233.
27.
Thompson, S., & Thurlow, M. (2001). 2001 state special education outcomes: A report on state activities at the beginning of a decade. Minneapolis : University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
28.
Thurlow, M.L., Lazarus, S.S., Thompson, S.J., & Morse, A.B. (2005). State policies on assessment participation and accommodations for students with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 38, 232—240.
29.
Turnbull, H.R., III , & Turnbull, A. (2000). Free appropriate public education: The law and children with disabilities (6th ed). Denver, CO: Love.
30.
Walker, H., Horner, R.H., Sugai, G., Bullis, M., Sprague, J., Bricker, D., et al. (1996). Integrated approaches to preventing antisocial behavior patterns among school-age children and youth. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 4, 194—209.
31.
Wang, M.C., Haertel, G.D., Walberg, H.J. (1997). What helps students learn? Spotlight on student success. Retrieved April 13, 2005, from the ERIC Database. (Report No. LSS-Ser-209). Philadelphia PA: Mid-Atlantic Lab for Student Success. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 461694)
32.
Wilcox, B.L., Turnbull, H.R., III , & Turnbull, A.P. (1999—2000). Behavioral issues and IDEA: Positive behavioral interventions and supports and the functional behavioral assessment in the disciplinary context. Exceptionality, 8(3), 173—187.
33.
Witt, J.C., VanderHeyden, A.M., & Gilbertson, D. (2004). Troubleshooting behavioral interventions: A systematic process for finding and eliminating problems. School Psychology Review, 33(3), 363—384.
