This study examined how the composition of a behavior support team affected use of assessment information in the design of behavior support plans. Specifically, we examined if typical teams designed behavior support plans that differed in (a) technical adequacy and/or (b) contextual fit when (1) teams did not include behavior specialists, (2) teams included behavior specialists, or (3) behavior specialists worked alone. Fifty-eight school personnel on 12 behavior support teams from typical elementary schools and 6 behavior specialists participated in the study. Vignettes describing hypothetical students with functional behavior assessment outcome information were used to develop 36 behavior support plans (12 by teams alone, 12 by specialists alone, and 12 by teams with specialists). Results were assessed by 3 expert behavior analysts for technical adequacy and by all 64 team members for contextual fit. Technical adequacy tended to be rated high if specialists alone or teams including a specialist designed the plan. Contextual fit tended to be rated high when teams alone or teams including a specialist designed the plan. Team members ranked plans developed by the team alone and plans developed by the team with a specialist as preferred for implementation over plans developed by a specialist alone. Implications for the selection of behavior support team membership are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Albin, R.W., Lucyshyn, J.M., Horner, R.H., & Flannery, K.B. (1996). Contextual fit for behavior support plans: A model for a goodness of fit. In L. K. Koegel, R. L. Koegel, & G. Dunlap (Eds.), Positive behavior support: Including people with di ficult behavior in the community (pp. 81— 98). Baltimore: Brookes .
2.
Benazzi, L., Nakayama, N., Sterling, L., Kidd, K., & Albin, R. (2003, February). Function-based support: Current practices and research findings. The Oregon Conference 2003 : Eugene, OR.
3.
Bergstrom, M.K., Horner, R.H., & Crone, D.A. (2004). School-based team members conducting functional behavioral assessments in the general education environment. Manuscript submitted for publication.
4.
Carr, E.G., Horner, R.H., Turnbull, A.P., Marquis, J.G., McLaughlin, D.M., McAtee, M.L., et al. (1999). Positive behavior support for people with developmental disabilities. Washington, DC: American Association on Mental Retardation.
5.
Carr, E.G., Langdon, N.A., & Yarbrough, S.C. (1999). Hypothesis-based intervention for severe problem behavior. In A. C. Repp & R. H. Horner (Eds.), Functional analysis of problem behavior: From e fective assessment to e fective support (pp. 9—31). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
6.
Crone, D.A., & Horner, R.H. (2003). Building positive behavior support systems in schools: Functional behavioral assessment. New York: Guilford Press.
7.
Didden, R., Duker, P.C., & Korzilius, H. (1997). Meta-analytic study on treatment effectiveness for problem behaviors with individuals who have mental retardation. American Journal of Mental Retardation, 101, 387— 399.
8.
Elliot, S.N., Witt, J.C., Kratochwill, T.R., & Callan-Stoiber, K. (2002). Selecting and evaluating classroom interventions. In M. R. Shinn , H. M. Walker, & G. Stoner (Eds.), Interventions for academic and behavior problems II: Preventative and remedial approaches (pp. 243—294). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists .
9.
Filter, K. (2003). The functional relationship between academic variables and problem behavior: A model assessment and intervention in the classroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon .
10.
Horner, R.H. (2000). Positive behavior supports. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 15(2), 97—105.
11.
Horner, R.H., Albin, R.W., Sprague, J.R., & Todd, A.W. (2000). Positive behavior support. In M. E. Snell and F. Brown (Eds.), Instruction of students with severe disabilities (pp. 47—83). Columbus, OH: Merrill .
12.
Horner, R.H., Sugai, G., Todd, A.W., & Lewis-Palmer, T. (2005). School-wide positive behavior support. In L. Bambara & L. Kern (Eds.), Individualized supports for students with problem behaviors: Designing positive behavior plans (pp. 359—390). New York: Guilford Press.
13.
Hsiao, Y., & Albin, R.W. (2000, May). The e fects of functional assessment information on the behavioral support recommendations for school personnel. Paper presented at the Association for Behavior Analysis Convention , Washington, DC.
14.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act amendments of 1997, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.
15.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act reauthorization of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq.
16.
Ingram, K., Lewis-Palmer, T., & Sugai, G. (2005). Function-based intervention planning: Comparing the effectiveness of function-based and non-function-based intervention plans . Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 7(4), 224—236.
17.
Keppel, G., & Zedeck, S. (1989). Data analysis for research designs. New York: Freeman.
18.
Lewis, T.J., & Sugai, G. (1999). Effective behavior support: A systems approach to proactive school-wide management. E fective School Practices , 17(4), 47—53.
19.
Lewis-Palmer, T., Todd, A.W., Horner, R.H., Sugai, G., & Sampson, N. (2004). Individual student systems evaluation tool. Eugene: Educational and Community Support, University of Oregon.
20.
Miltenberger, R. (1990). Assessment of treatment acceptability: A review of the literature. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education , 10(3), 24— 38.
21.
Mitachi, M., & Albin, R.W. (2001). The e fects of functional assessment information on the behavioral support recommendations of school personnel. Presentation at the 27th annual convention of the Association forBehavior Analysis, New Orleans, LA.
22.
Nelson, J.R., Roberts, M.L., Mathur, S.R., & Rutherford, R.B. , Jr. (1998). Has public policy exceeded our knowledge base? A review of the functional behavioral assessment literature. Behavior Disorders, 24(2), 169—179.
23.
Newcomer, L.L., & Lewis, T.J. (2004). Functional behavioral assessment: An investigation of assessment reliability and effectiveness of function-based interventions . Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 12(3), 168—181.
24.
O'Neill, R.E., Horner, R.H., Albin, R.W., Sprague, J.R., Storey, K., & Newton, J.S. (1997). Functional assessment and program development for problem behavior: A practical handbook. (2nd ed.), Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole .
25.
Prasse, D. (2002). Best practices in school psychology and the law . In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology IV (pp. 57—75). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
26.
Salantine, S.P., & Horner, R.H. (2002). The contextual fit questionnaire. Eugene: University of Oregon.
27.
Sandler, L., Albin, R.W., Horner, R.H., & Yovanoff. ( 2002). Contextual fit and the viability of behavior support plans. Unpublished manuscript.
Sugai, G., Horner, R.H., & Gresham, F.M. (2002). Behaviorally effective school environments. In M. R. Shinn, H. M. Walker, & G. Stoner (Eds.), Interventions for academic and behavior problems II: Preventative and remedial approaches (pp. 315—350). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
30.
Sugai, G., Horner, R.H., & Sprague, J.R. (1999). Functional-assessment-based behavior support planning: Research to practice to research. Behavioral Disorders, 24(3), 253—257.
31.
Walker, H.M., Colvin, G., & Ramsey, E. (1995). Antisocial behavior in schools: Strategies and best practice. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole .
32.
Walker, H.M., Horner, R.H., Sugai, G., Bullis, M., Sprague, J.R., Bricker, D., et al. (1996). Integrated approaches to preventing antisocial behavior patterns among school-age children and youth. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 4, 194—209.
33.
Walker, H.M., & Shinn, M. (2002). Structuring school-based interventions to achieve integrated primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention goals for safe and effective schools. In M. R. Shinn, H. M. Walker, & G. Stoner (Eds.), Interventions for academic and behavior problems II: Preventative and remedial approaches (pp.1—25). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists .
34.
Yell, M.L., & Shriner, J.G. (1997). The IDEA Amendments of 1997: Implications for special and general education teachers, administrators, and teacher trainers . Focus on Exceptional Children, 30, 1—19.
