An important goal in preventing writing disabilities is to provide effective early instruction to at-risk students to maximize their writing development. This study examined whether or not explicitly teaching six at-risk second-grade writers, including children with disabilities, how to plan and draft stories would improve their story writing as well as their recall of narrative reading material. The self-regulated strategy development model was used to teach these strategies; the impact of this instruction was evaluated via a multiple-baseline design. Instruction had a positive impact on students' writing, as their stories were longer, more complete, and, with the exception of one student, qualitatively better. Instructional effects also transferred to the recall of narrative reading material for four of the six students. These findings were generally maintained over time.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alexander, P. (1992). Domain knowledge: Evolving issues and emerging concerns. Educational Psychologist, 27, 33—51.
2.
Berninger, V., Abbott, R., Whitaker, D., Sylvester, L., & Nolen, S. (1995). Integrating low- and high-level skills in instructional protocols for writing disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly , 18, 293—309.
3.
Berninger, V., Vaughn, K., Abbott, R., Abbott, S., Rogan, L., Brooks, A., et al. (1997). Treatment of handwriting problems in beginning writers: Transfer from handwriting to composition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 652—666.
4.
Berninger, V., Vaughn, K., Abbott, R., Brooks, A., Abbott, S., Rogan, L., et al. (1998). Early intervention for spelling problems: Teaching functional spelling units of varying size with a multiple-connections framework. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 587—605.
Danoff, B., Harris, K.R., & Graham, S. (1993). Incorporating strategy instruction within the writing process in the regular classroom: Effects on normally achieving and learning disabled students' writing. Journal of Reading Behavior , 25, 295—322.
7.
De La Paz, S., & Graham, S. (1997). Strategy instruction in planning: Effects on the writing performance and behavior of students with learning difficulties. Exceptional Children, 63, 167—182.
8.
Englert, C., Garmon, A., Mariage, T., Rozendal, M., Tarrant, K., & Urba, J. (1995). The early literacy project: Connecting across the literacy curriculum. Learning Disability Quarterly, 18, 253—275.
9.
Fitzgerald, J., & Shanahan, T. (2000). Reading and writing relations and their development . Educational Psychologist, 35, 39—50.
10.
Graham, S. (1990). The role of production factors in learning disabled students' compositions. Journal of Educational Psychology , 82, 781—791.
11.
Graham, S. (in press a). Strategy instruction and the teaching of writing. In C. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research. New York: Guilford Press.
12.
Graham, S. (in press b). Writing. In P. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13.
Graham, S., & Harris, K.R. (1989). A components analysis of cognitive strategy training: Effects on learning disabled students' compositions and self-efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 353—361.
14.
Graham, S., & Harris, K.R. (2002). Prevention and intervention for struggling writers . In M. Shinn, G. Stoner, & H. Walker (Eds.), Interventions for academic and behavior problems: Vol. 2. Preventive and remedial techniques (pp. 589—610). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
15.
Graham, S., & Harris, K.R. (2003). Students with learning disabilities and the process of writing: A meta-analysis of SRSD studies. In H. L. Swan-son, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 323—344). New York: Guilford Press.
16.
Graham, S., & Harris, K.R. (2005a). Improving the writing performance of young struggling writers: Theoretical and programmatic research from the Center to Accelerate Student Learning. The Journal of Special Education, 39, 19—33.
17.
Graham, S., & Harris, K.R. (2005b). Writing better: E fective strategies for teaching students with learning disabilities. Baltimore: Brookes.
18.
Graham, S., Harris, K.R., & Fink, B. (2000). Is handwriting causally related to learning to write? Treatment of handwriting problems in beginning writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 620—633.
19.
Graham, S., Harris, K.R., & Fink-Chorzempa, B. (2002). Contributions of spelling instruction to the spelling, writing, and reading of poor spellers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 291—304.
20.
Graham, S., Harris, K.R., & Larsen, L. (2001). Prevention and intervention of writing difficulties with students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 16, 74—84.
21.
Graham, S., Harris, K.R., & Mason, L.H. (2005). Improving the writing performance, knowledge, and self-efficacy of struggling young writers: The effects of self-regulated strategy development. Contemporary Educational Psychology , 30, 207—241.
22.
Graham, S., & Perrin, D. (in press). Improving the writing ability of adolescent students: A cumulative meta-analysis. In A. Henriquez (Ed.), Annual report on adolescent literacy. New York: Carnegie Foundation.
23.
Hammill, D., & Larsen, S. (1996). Test of written language (TOWL-3). Circle Pines, MN: AGS.
Harris, K.R., & Graham, S. (1996). Making the writing process work: Strategies for composition and self-regulation. Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
26.
Harris, K.R., & Graham, S. (1999). Programmatic intervention research: Illustrations from the evolution of self-regulated strategy development. Learning Disability Quarterly, 22, 251—262.
27.
Harris, K.H., Graham, S., & Mason, L.H. (in press). Improving the writing performance, knowledge, and motivation of struggling writers in second grade: The effects of self-regulated strategy development. American Educational Research Journal.
28.
Hayes, J., & Flower, L. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes . In L. Gregg & E. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3—30). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29.
Horner, R., Carr, E., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S., & Wolery, M. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practices in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165—180.
30.
Jones, D., & Christensen, C. (1999). The relationship between automaticity in handwriting and students' ability to generate written text . Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 44—49.
31.
Kazdin, A.E. (1982). Single case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings. New York: Oxford University Press.
32.
Kellogg, R. (1993). The psychology of writing. New York: Oxford University Press.
33.
Leslie, L., & Cakdwell, J. (2002). Qualitative reading inventory—3 (3rd ed.). New York: Allyn & Bacon.
McCutchen, D. (1988). “Functional automaticity” in children's writing: A problem of metacognitive control. Written Communication, 5, 306—324.
36.
National Commission on Writing. (2003). The neglected “R.”New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
37.
National Commission on Writing. (2004). Writing: A ticket to work … or a ticket out: A survey of business leaders . Available at www.collegeboard.com
38.
National Commission on Writing. (2005). Writing: A powerful message from state government. Available at www.collegeboard.com
39.
Persky, H., Daane, M., & Jin, Y. (2003). The nation's report card: Writing. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
40.
Pintrich, P., & Schunk, D. (1996). Motivation in education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
41.
Psychological Corporation (The) . (2002 ). Wechsler individual achievement test (2nd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Author .
42.
Resta, S., & Eliot, J. (1994). Written expression in boys with attention deficit disorder. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79, 1131—1138.
43.
Saddler, B., Moran, S., Graham, S., & Harris, K.R. (2004). Preventing writing difficulties: The effects of planning strategy instruction on the writing performance of struggling writers . Exceptionality, 12(1), 3—7.
44.
Sawyer, R., Graham, S., & Harris, K.R. (1992). Direct teaching, strategy instruction, and strategy instruction with explicit self-regulation: Effects on learning disabled students' composition skills and self-efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 340—352.
45.
Shanahan, T. (in press). Relations among oral language, reading, and writing development . In C. MacArthur, S. Graham, & J. Fitzgerald (Eds.), Handbook of writing research. New York: Guilford Press.
46.
Slavin, R., Karweit, N., & Madden, N. (1989). E fective programs for students at-risk. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
47.
Stein, N., & Glenn, C. (1979). An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children. In R. Freedle (Ed.), Advances in discourse processes: Vol. 2. New directions in discourse processing. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
