In this article, the authors compare the reading behavior of students with low vision to that of two groups of students with normal vision (reading-match and age-match students). In Experiment 1, students identified the first letter in words and nonwords and the researchers measured latency and accuracy. No group differences were found for latency, but the reading-match group differed from the other two groups on accuracy. All three groups identified the first letter of words faster than they did for nonwords. In Experiment 2, students named words with typical and atypical letter—sound relationships; the researchers measure latency and accuracy. Both the low-vision and the reading-match groups were slower than the age-match group; only the reading-match group made more errors on typical stimuli than on atypical stimuli. The absence of significant interactions between group and any experimental-word variable justified the conclusion that low vision affects the reading process quantitatively but not qualitatively.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ahn, S.J., & Legge, G.E. (1995). Psychophysics of reading XIII: Predictors of magnifier-aided reading speed in low vision. Vision Research, 35, 1931—1938.
2.
Arditi, A. (1999). Elicited sequential presentation for low vision reading. Vision Research, 39, 4412—4418.
3.
Bosman, A.M.T., & de Groot, A.M.B. (1995). Evidence for assembled phonology in beginning and fluent readers as assessed with the first-letter-naming task. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 59, 234— 259.
4.
Bosman, A.M.T., & de Groot, A.M.B. (1996). Phonologic mediation is fundamental to reading: Evidence from beginning readers. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49A, 715—744.
5.
Bosman, A.M.T., van Leerdam, M., & de Gelder, B. (2000). The /O/ in OVER is different from the /O/ in OTTER: Phonological effects in Dutch students with and without dyslexia. Developmental Psychology, 36, 817— 825.
6.
Brus, B.T., & Voeten, M.J.M. (1973). Een-minuut test [One-minute test]. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Berkhout.
7.
Caesar, F.B. (1979). Veilig leren lezen [Learning to read safely]. Tilburg, The Netherlands: Zwijsen.
8.
Corley, G., & Pring, L. (1993a). The oral reading errors of partially sighted students. The British Journal of Visual Impairment, 11, 24—27.
9.
Corley, G., & Pring, L. (1993b). Reading strategies in partially sighted students. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung [ International Journal of Rehabilitation Research], 16, 209—220.
10.
Cummins, R.W., & Rubin, G.S. (1991). Reading rates with artificial macular scotomas . Optometry and Vision Science, 68, 63—64.
11.
Daugherty, K.M. (1977). Monterey learning systems: Improving academic achievement of visually impaired learners. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 71, 298—302.
12.
Douglas, G., Grimley, M., McLinden, M., & Watson, L. (2004). Reading errors made by children with low vision . Ophthalmic & Physiological Optics, 24, 319—322.
13.
Ducrot, S., Lété, B., Sprenger-Charolles, L., Pynte, J., & Billard, C. (2003). The optimal viewing position effect in beginning and dyslexic readers. Current Psychology Letters, 10. Retrieved February 2, 2005, from http://cpl.revues.org/document99.htm
14.
Fellenius, K. (1996). Reading competence of visually impaired pupils in Sweden. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 90, 237—246.
15.
Fellenius, K. (1999). Swedish 9-year-old readers with visual impairments: A heterogeneous group. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness , 93, 370—380.
16.
Fridal, G., Jansen, L., & Klindt, M. (1981). Courses in reading development for partially sighted students. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 75, 4—7.
17.
Frost, R. (1998). Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin,123, 71—99.
18.
Gompel, M., Janssen, N. M., van Bon, W. H. J., & Schreuder, R. (2003). Visual input and orthographic knowledge in word reading of children with low vision. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness , 97, 273—284.
19.
Gompel, M., van Bon, W.H.J., Schreuder, R., & Adriaansen, J.J.M. (2002). Reading and spelling competence of Dutch children with low vision. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 96, 435—447.
20.
Legge, G.E., Mansfield, J.S., & Chung, S.T.L. (2001). Psychophysics of reading. XX. Linking letter recognition to reading speed in central and peripheral vision. Vision Research, 41, 725—734.
21.
Monsell, S. (1991). The nature and locus of word frequency effects in reading. In D. Besner & G.W. Humphreys (Eds.), Basic processes in reading: Visual word recognition (pp. 148—197). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22.
Pick, A.D., Thomas, M.L., & Pick, H.L. (1966). The role of grapheme— phoneme correspondence in the perception of Braille. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 5, 298—300.
23.
Pring, L. (1982). Phonological and tactual coding of Braille by blind students. The British Journal of Psychology, 13, 351—359.
24.
Raasch, T.W., & Rubin, G.S. (1993). Reading with low vision. Journal of the American Optometric Association, 64, 15—18.
25.
Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (1989). The psychology of reading. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
26.
Rubin, G.S., & Turano, K. (1994). Low vision reading with sequential word presentation . Vision Research, 34, 1723—1733.
27.
Snow, C.E., Burns, M.S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children . Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
28.
Stanovich, K.E., & West, R.F. (1989). Exposure to print and orthographic processing . Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 402—433.
29.
Staphorsius, G., Krom, P.S.H., & de Geus, K. (1988). Frequenties van woordvormen en letterposities in jeugdliteratuur [Frequencies of word forms and letter positions in youth literature]. Arnhem, The Netherlands: Cito.
30.
Stein, J., & Talcott, J. (1999). Impaired neuronal timing in developmental dyslexia: The magnocellular hypothesis. Dyslexia (Chichester, England) , 5, 59—77.
31.
Taylor, D. (1997). Paediatric ophthalmology. Oxford, United Kingdom : Black-well Science.
32.
van Leerdam, M. (1995). Recognition of word-component letters is subject to whole-stimulus processing: A response-competition account of first-letter naming performance. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
33.
Van Orden, G.C., Pennington, B.F., & Stone, G.O. (1990). Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics. Psychological Review, 97, 488—522.
34.
Verhoeven, L., & van Leeuwe, J. (2003). Ontwikkeling van decodeervaardigheid in het basisonderwijs [Development of decoding skill in primary education] . Pedagogische Studiën, 80, 257—271.
35.
Watson, G.R. (2000). Functional assessment of low vision for activities of daily living. In B. Silverstone, M. A. Lang, B. P. Rosenthal , & E. E. Faye (Eds.), The lighthouse handbook on vision impairment and vision rehabilitation (pp. 869—884). New York: Oxford University Press.
36.
West, S.K., Rubin, G.S., Broman, A.T., Muñoz, B., Bandeem-Roche, K., & Turano, K. (2002). How does visual impairment affect performance on tasks of everyday life? Archives ofOphthalmology, 120, 774—780.
37.
Wurm, L.H., Legge, G.E., Isenberg, L.M., & Luebker, A. (1993). Color improves object recognition in normal and low vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 19, 899— 911.
