This study investigated the differential effects of two problem-solving instructional approaches— schema-based instruction (SBI) and general strategy instruction (GSI)—on the mathematical word problem—solving performance of 22 middle school students who had learning disabilities or were at risk for mathematics failure. Results indicated that the SBI group significantly outperformed the GSI group on immediate and delayed posttests as well as the transfer test. Implications of the study are discussed within the context of the new IDEA amendment and access to the general education curriculum.
Carnine, D., Jones, E.D., & Dixon, R. (1994). Mathematics: Educational tools for diverse learners . School Psychology Review, 3, 406—427.
5.
Cawley, J.F., & Miller, J.H. (1989). Cross-sectional comparisons of the mathematical performance of children with learning disabilities: Are we on the right track toward comprehensive programming?Journal of Learning Disabilities , 23, 250—254, 259.
6.
Cawley, J., Parmar, R., Foley, T.E., Salmon, S., & Roy, S. (2001). Arithmetic performance of students: Implications for standards and programming. Exceptional Children, 67, 311—328.
7.
Cawley, J.F., Parmar, R.S., Yan, W., & Miller, J.H. (1998). Arithmetic computation performance of students with learning disabilities: Implications for curriculum. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 13(2), 68—74.
8.
Didierjean, A., & Cauzinille-Marmeche, E. (1998). Reasoning by analogy: Is it schema-mediated or case-based?European Journal of Psychology of Education, 13, 385—398.
9.
Englert, C.S., Culatta, B.E., & Horn, D.G. (1987). Influence of irrelevant information in addition word problems on problem solving. Learning Disability Quarterly , 10, 29—36.
10.
Friendly, M. (2000). Power analysis for ANOVA designs. Retrieved August 7, 2002, from http://davidmlane.com/hyperstat/power.html
11.
Fuson, K.C., & Willis, G.B. (1989). Second graders' use of schematic drawings in solving addition and subtraction word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 514—520.
12.
Goldman, S.R., Hasselbring, T.S., & the Cognition and Technology Group at Vanderbilt. (1997). Achieving meaningful mathematics literacy for students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 198-208.
13.
Gonzalez, J.E.J., & Espinel, A.I.G. (1999). Is IQ—achievement discrepancy relevant in the definition of arithmetic learning disabilities?Learning Disability Quarterly, 22, 291—301.
14.
Hedges, L.V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
15.
Hutchinson, N.L. (1993). Effects of cognitive strategy instruction on algebra problem solving of adolescents with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 16, 34—63.
16.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1997, 120 U.S.C. §1400 et seq.
17.
Jitendra, A.K., DiPipi, C.M., & Grasso, E. (2001). The role of a graphic representational technique on the mathematical problem solving performance of fourth graders: An exploratory study. Australian Journal of Special Education, 25(1&2), 17-33.
18.
Jitendra, A., DiPipi, C.M., & Perron-Jones, N. (2002). An exploratory study of schema-based word-problem-solving instruction for middle school students with learning disabilities: An emphasis on conceptual and procedural understanding . The Journal of Special Education, 36, 23—38.
19.
Jitendra, A.K., Griffin, C.C., McGoey, K., Gardill, M.C., Bhat, P., & Riley, T. (1998). Effects of mathematical word problem solving by students at risk or with mild disabilities. The Journal of Educational Research, 91, 345—355.
20.
Jitendra, A., & Hoff, K. (1996). The effects of schema-based instruction on mathematical word problem solving performance of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29, 422—431.
21.
Jitendra, A.K., Hoff, K., & Beck, M.M. (1999). Teaching middle school students with learning disabilities to solve word problems using a schema-based approach. Remedial and Special Education, 20, 50—64.
22.
Jitendra, A.K., & Xin, Y.P. (1997). Mathematical word problem solving instruction for students with mild disabilities and students at risk for math failure: A research synthesis. The Journal of Special Education, 30, 412—438.
23.
Judd, T.P., & Bilsky, L.H. (1989). Comprehension and memory in the solution of verbal arithmetic problems by mentally retarded and nonretarded individuals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 541—546.
24.
Lewis, A.B. (1989). Training students to represent arithmetic word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 521—531.
25.
Lewis, A.B., & Mayer, R.E. (1987). Students' miscomprehension of relational statements in arithmetic word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology , 79, 361—371.
26.
Maccini, P., & Gagnon, J.C. (2002). Perceptions and application of NCTM standards by special and general education teachers. Exceptional Children , 68, 325—344.
27.
Marshall, S.P. (1995). Schemas in problem solving. New York: Cambridge University Press.
28.
Mayer, R.E. (1982). Memory for algebra story problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 199—216.
29.
Montague, M. (1992). The effects of cognitive and metacognitive strategy instruction on the mathematical problem solving of middle school students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 25, 230—248.
30.
Montague, M. (1997). Student perception, mathematical problem solving, and learning disabilities. Remedial and Special Education , 18, 46—53.
31.
Montague, M., Applegate, B., & Marquard, K. (1993). Cognitive strategy instruction and mathematical problem-solving performance of students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 8, 223—232.
32.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. ( 2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Retrieved June 28, 2005, from http://standards.nctm.org
33.
National Education Goals Panel. (1997). National Education Goals Report Summary, 1997. Washington, DC: Author.
34.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat.1425 (2002).
35.
Parmar, R.S. (1992). Protocol analysis of strategies used by students with mild disabilities when solving arithmetic word problems. Diagnostique, 17, 227—243.
36.
Parmar, R.S., Cawley, J.F., & Frazita, R.R. (1996). Word problem-solving by students with and without mild disabilities. Exceptional Children, 62, 415—429.
37.
Prawat, R.S. (1989). Promoting access to knowledge, strategy, and disposition in students: A research synthesis. Review of Educational Research , 59, 1—41.
38.
Schoenfeld, A.H., & Herrmann, D.J. (1982). Problem perception and knowledge structure in expert and novice mathematical problem solvers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition , 8, 484—494.
Sweller, J., Chandler, P., Tierney, P., & Cooper, M. (1990). Cognitive load as a factor in the structuring of technical material. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 176—192.
41.
The Goals 2000: Educate America Act, P.L. 103-227 (1994).
42.
Wechsler, D. (1974). Wechsler intelligence scale for children—Revised . San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
43.
Xin, Y.P., & Jitendra, A.K. (1999). The effects of instruction in solving mathematical word problems for students with learning problems: A meta-analysis. The Journal of Special Education, 32, 40—78.
44.
Zawaiza, T.B.W., & Gerber, M.M. (1993). Effects of explicit instruction on community college students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly , 16, 64—79.
45.
Zentall, S.S., & Ferkis, M.A. (1993). Mathematical problem solving for youth with ADHD, with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 16, 6—18.
