Focus groups with teachers of students with learning disabilities (n = 30) and teachers of students with emotional/behavior disorders (n = 19) were conducted to examine the the teachers' perspectives about educational research and the extent to which they found research findings to be useful. The study further addressed the ways in which new practices were introduced within target teachers' schools and their reaction to the appropriateness of these practices for students with special needs. Findings revealed that most teachers were not pressed to use practices supported by their school or district. Furthermore, the notion of “research-based” was not important as a criterion for selection. Teachers sought instructional practices that were feasible, were appropriate for their students, were accompanied by all necessary materials and professional development support, and could be individualized for multilevel classrooms.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abbott, M., Walton, C., Tapia, Y., & Greenwood, C.R. (1999). Research to practice: A “blueprint” for closing the gap in local schools. Exceptional Children , 65(3), 339—352.
2.
Adams, M.J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
3.
Bullough, R.V., Kauchak, D., Crow, N.A., Hobbs, S., & Stokes, D. (1997). Professional development schools: Catalysts for teacher and school change. Teaching and Teacher Education , 13(2), 153—169.
4.
Carnine, D. (1997). Bridging the research-to-practice gap. Exceptional Children, 63(4), 513—522.
5.
Carnine, D. (2000, April). Why education experts resist e fective practices (Report of the Thomas B. Fordham Foundation). Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.
6.
Collins, J. (1997, October). How Johnny should read. Time, 27, 81.
7.
Crockett, J.B. (2004). Taking stock of science in the schoolhouse: Four ideas for fostering effective instruction. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(3), 189—199.
8.
Cuban, L. (1990). Reforming again, again, and again. Educational Researcher, 19(1), 3—13.
9.
Cullinan, D., Epstein, M., & Lloyd, J. (1983). Behavior disorders of children and adolescents . Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
10.
Dyson, J.W., Godwin, P.H.B., & Hazelwood, L.A. (1976). Group composition, leadership orientation, and decisional outcomes. Small Groups Behavior , 7, 114—128.
11.
Elmore, R.F. (1996). Getting to scale with good educational practice . Harvard Educational Review, 66, 1—26.
12.
Evertson, C.M., & Green, J.L. (1986). Observation as inquiry and method. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed., pp. 162—213). New York: Macmillan.
13.
Finn, C.E. (2000). Why education experts resist e fective practices: Foreword (Report of the Thomas B. Fordham Foundation). Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.
14.
In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 695—727). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15.
Fowler, J.F.J. (1984). Survey research methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
16.
Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L.S. (1998). Researchers and teachers working together to adapt instruction for diverse learners. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 13(3), 126—137.
17.
Gersten, R., & Brengelman, S.U. (1996). The quest to translate research into classroom practice: The emerging knowledge base. Remedial and Special Education, 17(2), 67—80.
18.
Gersten, R., Chard, D., & Baker, S. (2000). Factors enhancing sustained use of research-based instructional practices. Journal of Learning Disabilities , 33(5), 445—458.
19.
Gersten, R., Schiller, E.P., & Vaughn, S. (2000). Contemporary special education research. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
20.
Gersten, R., Vaughn, S., Deshler, D., & Schiller, E. (1997). What we know about using research findings: Implications for improving special education practice. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30, 466—476.
21.
Gersten, R., Woodward, J., & Morvant, M. (1992). Refining the working knowledge of experienced teachers. Educational Leadership, 49(7), 34—39.
22.
Henry, S.K., Scott, J.A., Wells, J., Skobel, B., Jones, A., Cross, S., et al. (1999). Linking university and teacher communities: A “think tank” model of professional development. Teacher Education and Special Education, 22(4), 251—268.
23.
Hutchinson, N.L., & Martin, A.K. (1999). Fostering inclusive beliefs and practices during preservice teacher education through communities of practice. Teacher Education and Special Education, 22(4), 234—250.
24.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004. H.R. 1350. (2004). Accessed at http://thomas.loc.gov
25.
Kauffman, J.M. (1996). Research to practice issues. Behavioral Disorders, 22(1), 55—60.
26.
Kauffman, J.M. (1997). Characteristics of emotional and behavioral disorders of children and youth (6th ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
27.
Klingner, J.K. (2004). The science of professional development. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37(3), 248—255.
Krueger, R.A., & Casey, M.A. (2000). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
30.
Levy, S., & Vaughn, S. (2002). An observational study of reading instruction of teachers of students with emotional/behavioral disorders. Behavior Disorder, 27(3), 215—235.
Lloyd, J.W., Weintraub, F.J., & Safer, N.D. (1997). A bridge between research and practice: Building consensus. Exceptional Children, 63(4), 535—538.
33.
Lyons, L. (1991). The integration of qualitative and quantitative research in a longitude retention study (Report No. HE-024-854). Jersey City, NJ: Jersey City State College, Institutional Research. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 336 034)
McKenna, B. (1992). Special education research priorities focus on action. Educational Researcher, 12(5), 27—29.
36.
Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA : Sage.
37.
Moody, S.W., Vaughn, S., Hughes, M.T., & Fischer, M. (2000). Reading instruction in the resource room: Set up for failure. Exceptional Children, 66(3), 305—316.
38.
Morgan, D., & Krueger, R. (1993). When to use focus groups and why. In D. L. Morgan (Ed.), Successful focus groups: Advancing the state of the art (pp. 3—19). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
39.
National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. (2000). Professional development for teachers. Learning Disability Quarterly, 23, 2—6.
40.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institutes of Health.
41.
Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative education and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
42.
Schumm, J.S., & Vaughn, S. (1995). Meaningful professional development in accommodating students with disabilities. Remedial and Special Education , 16(6), 344—353.
43.
Smylie, M.A. (1989). Teacher's views of the effectiveness of sources of learning to teach. Elementary School Journal, 89, 543—558.
44.
Smylie, M.A., & Kahne, J. (1997). Why what works doesn't in teacher education. Education and Urban Society, 29(3), 355—373.
45.
Snow, C. E., Burns, S. M., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children . Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
46.
Stanovich, P.J., & Stanovich, K.E. (1997). Research into practice in special education. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 30(5), 477—481.
47.
Stewart, D.W., & Shamdasani, P.N. (1990). Focus groups: Theory and practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage .
48.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
49.
Swanson, H.L. (1999). Instructional components that predict treatment outcomes for students with learning disabilities: Support for a combined strategy and direct instruction model. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 14(3), 129—140.
50.
Vaughn, S., Gersten, R., & Chard, D.J. (2000). The underlying message in LD intervention research: Findings from research syntheses. Exceptional Children, 67(1), 99—114.
51.
Vaughn, S., Klingner, J.K., & Hughes, M.T. (2004). Sustainability of research-based practices: Implications for students with disabilities. In A. Sorrells , H. Rieth, & P. Sindelar (Eds.), Critical issues in special education (pp. 135—153). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
52.
Vaughn, S., Moody, S., & Schumm, J.S. (1998). Broken promises: Reading instruction in the resource room. Exceptional Children, 64(2), 211—225.
53.
Vaughn, S., Schumm, J.S., & Sinagub, J.M. (1996). Focus group interviews: Use and application in education and psychology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
54.
Yin, R.K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
