Accounting for the Performance of Students With Disabilities on Statewide Assessments

Abstract

The current study investigates school-level factors that affect the performance of students with disabilities on statewide assessments. Data were collected as part of a larger study examining the effects of education policy reform on students with disabilities. Statewide assessment data for students with disabilities from 2 school districts within 1 state were analyzed. Assessment results in reading and math in 3rd, 5th, and 8th grades across 2 school years were analyzed using a series of hierarchical linear regressions. Of the variables considered, only the performance of schools' general education students on the assessments added any predictive value to the regression model after accounting for school demographic indicators.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alspaugh, J.W. , & Gao, R. (2003). School size as a factor in elementary school achievement . Columbia: University of Missouri . (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED475062)

Borland, M.V. , & Howsen, R.M. (2003). An examination of the effect of elementary school size on student academic achievement. International Review of Education, 49, 463—474.

Caldas, S.J. , & Bankston, C., III. (1997). Effects of school population socioeconomic status on individual academic achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 90, 269—277.

Darling-Hammond, L. (1997). Doing what matters most: Investing in quality teaching. New York: National Commission on Teaching and America's Future.

Driscoll, D. , Halcoussis, D. , & Svorny, S. (2003). School district size and student performance. Economics of Education Review, 22, 193—201.

Elliott, J.L. , Erickson, R. , Thurlow, M. , & Shriner, J. (2000). State-level accountability for the performance of students with disabilities: Five years of change? The Journal of Special Education, 34, 39—47.

Goertz, M.E. (2001). Standards-based accountability: Horse trade or horse whip? In S. Fuhrman (Ed.), From the capitol to the classroom: Standards-based reform in the states (One hundredth yearbook of the National Society of the Study of Education, pp. 39—59). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Goldring, E.B. , & Shapira, R. (1996). Principals' survival with parental involvement . School E fectiveness and School Improvement, 7, 342—360.

Ho, S. , & Willms, J.D. (1996). Effects of parental involvement on eighth-grade achievement. Sociology of Education, 69, 126—141.

10.

Ma, X. , & Klinger, D.A. (2000). Hierarchical linear modeling of student and school effects on academic achievement. Canadian Journal of Education , 25(1), 41—55.

11.

McLaughlin, M.J. , & Thurlow, M. (2003). Educational accountability and students with disabilities: Issues and challanges. Educational Policy, 17, 431— 451.

12.

Namboodiri, K. , Corwin, R.G. , & Dorsten, L.E. (1993). Analyzing distributions in school effects research: An empirical illustration. Sociology of Education, 66, 278—294.

13.

The No Child Left Behind Act. (2001). Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425 (2002).

14.

Quality counts: Special education in an era of standards. ( 2004, January 8). Education Week, 23(17).

15.

Skrla, L. , Scheurich, J.J. , Johnson, J.F. , & Koschoreck, J.W. (2001). Accountability for equity: Can state policy leverage social justice? International Journal of Leadership in Education, 4, 237—260.

16.

Thurlow, M. , Lazarus, S. , Thompson, S. , & Robey, J. (2002). 2001 state policies on assessment participation and accommodations (Synthesis Report 46). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.

17.

U.S. Department of Education. (2002). Twenty-fourth annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.