This article reports the effects of a 2-year supplemental reading program for students in kindergarten through third grade that focused on the development of decoding skills and reading fluency. Two hundred ninety-nine students were identified for participation and were randomly assigned to the supplemental instruction or to a no-treatment control group. Participants' reading ability was assessed in the fall, before the first year of the intervention, and again in the spring of Years 1, 2, 3, and 4. At the end of the 2-year intervention, students who received the supplemental instruction performed significantly better than their matched controls on measures of entry-level reading skills (i.e., letter—word identification and word attack), oral reading fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension. The benefits of the instruction were still clear 2 years after instruction had ended, with students in the supplemental-instruction condition still showing significantly greater growth on the measure of oral reading fluency. Hispanic students benefited from the supplemental reading instruction in English as much as or more than non-Hispanic students. Results support the value of supplemental instruction focused on the development of word recognition skills for helping students at risk for reading failure.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Achenbach, T.M. (1991). Manual for the teacher's report form and 1991 profile. Burlington: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.
2.
Adams, G.L., & Engelmann, S. (1996). Research on direct instruction: 25 years beyond DISTAR. Seattle, WA: Educational Achievement Systems.
3.
Adams, M.J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
4.
Anderson, R.C., Hiebert, E.H., Scott, J.A., & Wilkinson, I.A.G. (1985). Becoming a nation of readers: The report of the Commission onReading. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Education, National Institute of Education.
5.
August, D., & Hakuta, K. (1997). Improving schooling for language-minority children: A research agenda. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
6.
Biemiller, A. (1999). Language and reading success. Cambridge, MA: Brook-line.
7.
Cohen, J. (1987). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum .
8.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum .
9.
Cunningham, A.E., & Stanovich, K.E. (1998). The impact of print exposure on word recognition. In J. L. Metsala & L. C. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 235—262). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
10.
Ehri, L.C. (1998). Grapheme—phoneme knowledge is essential for learning to read words in English. In J. L. Metsala & L. C. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 3—40). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Fitzgerald, J. (1995). English-as-a-second language reading instruction in the United States: A research review. Journal of Reading Behavior, 27(2), 115—152.
14.
Foorman, B.R., Francis, D.J., Fletcher, J.M., Schatschneider, C., & Mehta, P. (1998). The role of instruction in learning to read: Preventing reading failure in at-risk students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 37— 55.
15.
Francis, D.J., Shaywitz, S.E., Steubing, K.K., Shaywitz, B.A., & Fletcher, J.M. (1996). Developmental lag versus deficit models of reading disability: A longitudinal, individual growth curves analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 3—17.
16.
Fuchs, L.S., & Deno, S.L. (1991). Curriculum-based measurement: Current applications and future directions. Exceptional Students, 57, 466—501.
17.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M.K., & Jenkins, J.R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 239—256.
18.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., & Maxwell, L. (1988). The validity of informal reading comprehension measures. Remedial and Special Education, 9, 20— 28.
19.
Gersten, R., & Geva, E. (2003). Teaching reading to early language learners. Educational Leadership, 60(7), 44—49.
20.
Good, R.H., III, Kaminski, R., Laimon, D., & Johnson, D.S. (1992). Advances in assessment for the primary prevention of early academic problems. The Oregon Conference Monograph, 1992 (pp. 100—109). Eugene: University of Oregon College of Education.
21.
Good, R.H.,Iii , KaminskiR.A., , SimmonsD., , & Kame'enui , E.J. (2001). Using dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills (DIBELS) in an outcomes-driven model: Steps to reading outcomes. Unpublished manuscript.
22.
Gunn, B., Biglan, A., Smolkowski, K., & Ary, D. (2000). The efficacy of supplemental instruction in decoding skills for Hispanic and non-Hispanic students in early elementary school. The Journal of Special Education, 34(2), 90—103.
23.
Gunn, B., Smolkowski, K., Biglan, A., & Black, C. (2002). Supplemental instruction in decoding skills for Hispanic and non-Hispanic students in early elementary school: A follow-up . The Journal of Special Education, 36(2), 69—79.
24.
Harrell, F.E. (2001). Regression modeling strategies with applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. New York: Springer-Verlag.
25.
Hinshaw, S.P. (1992). Academic underachievement, attention deficits, and aggression: Comorbidity and implications for intervention. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60(6), 893—903.
26.
Hops, H., & Walker, H.M. (1988). CLASS: Contingencies for Learning Academic and Social Skills: A classroom behavior management program for children with acting-out behaviors. Delray Beach, FL: Educational Achievement Systems.
27.
Jenkins, J.R., Fuchs, L.S., Espin, C., van den Broek, P., & Deno, S.L. (February, 2000). E fects of task format and performance dimension on word reading measures: Criterion validity, sensitivity to impairment, and context facilitation. Paper presented at Pacific Coast Research Conference, San Diego, CA.
28.
Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 students from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 437—447.
29.
Kellam, S.G., Mayer, L.S., Rebok, G.W., & Hawkins, W.E. (1998). Effects of improving achievement on aggressive behavior and of improving aggressive behavior on achievement through two preventive interventions: An investigation of causal paths. In B. P. Dohrenwend (Ed.), Adversity, stress, and psychopathology (pp. 486—505). London: Oxford University Press.
30.
Kreft, I., & de Leeuw, J. (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. London: Sage.
31.
LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S.J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293—323.
32.
Laird, N.M. (1988). Missing data in longitudinal studies. Statistics in Medicine, 7, 305—315.
33.
Linan-Thompson, S., & Hickman-Davis, P. (2002). Supplemental reading instruction for students at risk for reading disabilities: Improve reading 30 minutes at a time. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 17(4), 242—251.
34.
Lindsey, K.A., Manis, F.R., & Bailey, V.E. (2003). Prediction of first grade reading in Spanish-speaking English-language learners. Journal of Educational Psychology , 95(3), 482—494.
35.
Littell, R.C., Milliken, G.A., Stroup, W.W., & Wolfinger, R.D. (1996). SAS system for mixed models . Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
36.
Little, R.J.A. (1995). Modeling the dropout mechanism in repeated-measures studies. Journal of the American Statistical Association,90, 1112— 1121.
37.
Little, R.J.A., & Rubin, D.B. (1987). Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: Wiley.
38.
Markell, M.A., & Deno, S.L. (1997). Effects of increasing oral reading: Generalization across reading tasks. The Journal of Special Education, 31, 233—250.
39.
McGee, R., Prior, M., Williams, S., Smart, D., & Sanson, A. (2002). The long-term significance of teacher-rated hyperactivity and reading ability in childhood: Findings from two longitudinal studies. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Allied Disciplines , 43(8), 1004—1016.
40.
Murray, D.M. (1998). Design and analysis of group-randomized trials . New York: Oxford University Press .
41.
Nich, C., & Carroll, K. (1997). Now you see it, now you don't: A comparison of traditional versus random-effects regression models in the analysis of longitudinal follow-up data from a clinical trial. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 252—261.
42.
O'Connor, R. (2000). Increasing the intensity of intervention in kindergarten and first grade. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice , 15(1), 43—54.
43.
Ortiz, A., & Graves. A.W. (2001). English language learners with literacy-related learning disabilities. The International Dyslexia Association Commemorative Booklet, 52nd Annual Conference (pp. 31—35). Albuquerque, NM.
44.
Patterson, G.R., DeBaryshe, B.D., & Ramsey, E. (1989). A developmental perspective on antisocial behavior. Special Issue: Students and their development—knowledge base, research agenda, and social policy application. The American Psychologist , 44, 329—335.
45.
Quiroga, T., Lemos-Britton, Z., Mostafapour, E., Abbott, R.D., & Berninger, V.W. (2002). Phonological awareness and beginning reading in Spanish-speaking ESL first graders: Research into practice. Journal of School Psychology, 40(1), 85—111.
46.
Rayner, K., Foorman, B.R., Perfetti, C.A., Pesetsky, D., & Seidenberg, M.S. (2001). How psychological science informs the teaching of reading. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2, 31—74.
47.
Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R.L. (1991). Essentials of behavioral research, methods, and data analysis. San Francisco: McGraw-Hill .
48.
SAS Institute. (1999). SAS/STAT® user's guide, version 8. Cary, NC: SAS.
49.
Share, D.L., & Stanovich, K.E. (1995). Cognitive processes in early reading development: Accommodating individual differences into a model of acquisition. Issues in Education: Contributions FromEducational Psychology, 1, 1—57.
50.
Singer, J.D. (1998). Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 24(4), 323—355.
51.
Singer, J.D. (2002). Fitting individual growth models using SAS PROC MIXED. In D. S. Moskowitz & S. L. Hershberger (Eds.), Modeling intraindividual variability with repeated measures data: Methods and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
52.
Singer, J.D., & Willett, J.B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. New York: Oxford University Press.
53.
Slavin, R.E., Madden, N.A., Dolan, L.J., Wasik, B.A., Ross, S., Smith, L., et al. (1996). Success for all: A summary of research . Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 1(1), 41—76.
54.
Smolkowski, K., Biglan, A., Barrera, M., Taylor, T.K., Black, C., & Blair, J. (2005). Schools and Homes in Partnership (SHIP): Long-term effects of a preventive intervention focused on social behavior and reading skill early elementary school. Prevention Science.
55.
Snow, C.E., Burns, S.M., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children . Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education.
56.
Stahl, S., & Miller, P. (1989). Whole language and language experience approaches for beginning reading: A quantitative research synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 59(87), 116.
Stanovich, K.E. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 32—71.
59.
Stanovich, K.E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21(4), 360—406.
60.
Torgesen, J.K. (2000). Individual differences in response to early interventions in reading: The lingering problem of treatment resisters. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15(1), 55—64.
61.
Torgesen, J.K., Wagner, R.K., & Rashotte, C.A. (1997). Approaches to the prevention and remediation of phonologically based reading disabilities. In B. Blachman (Ed.), Foundations of reading acquisition and dyslexia: Implications for early intervention (pp. 287—304). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
62.
Torgesen, J.K., Wagner, R.K., Rashotte, C.A., & Herron, J. (1999). A comparison of two computer assisted approaches to the prevention of reading disabilities in young children. Unpublished manuscript.
63.
Vellutino, F.R., Scanlon, D.M., Sipay, E.R., Small, S.G., Pratt, A.C., Chen, R., et al. (1996). Cognitive profiles of difficult-to-remediate and readily remediated poor readers: Early intervention as a vehicle for distinguishing between cognitive and experiential deficits as basic causes of specific reading disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 601— 638.
64.
Walker, H., & McConnell, S. (1988). The Walker-McConnell scale of social competence and school adjustments. Austin, TX: PRO-ED, Inc.
65.
Walker, H. M., Ramsey, E., & Gresham, F. M. (Eds.). (2004). Antisocial behavior in school: Evidence-based practices (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
66.
Wallace, D., & Green, S.B. (2002). Analysis of repeated measures designs with linear mixed models. In D. S. Moskowitz & S. L. Hershberger (Eds.), Modeling intraindividual variability with repeated measures data: Methods and applications. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum .
67.
Webster-Stratton, C. (1992a). The incredible years: A trouble-shooting guide for parents of children aged 3—8. Toronto, Canada: Umbrella Press.
68.
Webster-Stratton, C. (1992b). The Teachers and Children's Videotape Series: Dina Dinosaur's Social Skills and Problem-Solving Curriculum. Seattle, WA.
69.
Whitehurst, G.J., & Lonigan, C.J. (1998). Child development and emergent literacy. Child Development, 69, 848—872.
70.
Woodcock, R.W., & Mather, N. (1989). WJ-R tests of achievement: Examiner's manual. In R. W. Woodcock & M. B. Johnson (Eds.), Woodcock-Johnson psycho-educational battery—Revised. Allen, TX: DLM Teaching Resources.
71.
Woodcock, R.W., & Mather, N. (1990). WJ-R tests of achievement: Examiner's manual. In R. W. Woodcock & M. B. Johnson (Eds.), Woodcock-Johnson psycho-educational battery—Revised. Allen, TX: DLM Teaching Resources.
