In this article, we summarize a good portion of the CASL research program on reading in the early grades. We first describe investigations conducted in kindergarten, where our focus was on the development of decoding and word recognition. Then we discuss studies conducted in first grade, where we continued to emphasize decoding and word recognition but expanded our focus to include fluency and comprehension. In explaining the methods of these studies, we provide the greatest detail for the first study, at kindergarten. Our description of subsequent studies is more concise because they share many methodological features with the first kindergarten study. Before closing, we offer several conclusions about practice and future research.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, M.J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press .
2.
Al Otaiba, S., & Fuchs, D. (2002). Characteristics of children who are unresponsive to early literacy intervention: A review of the literature. Remedial and Special Education, 23(5), 300—316.
3.
Al Otaiba, S., & Fuchs, D. (in press). Who are the young children for whom best practices in reading are ineffective? An experimental and longitudinal study. Journal of Learning Disabilities.
4.
Baker, J.L., & Zigmond, N. (1990). Are regular education classes equipped to accommodate students with learning disabilities?Exceptional Children , 56, 515—526.
5.
Ball, E.W., & Blachman, B.A. (1991). Does phoneme segmentation training in kindergarten make a difference in early word recognition and developmental spelling?Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 49—66.
6.
Braddock, J., II, Hawley, W., Hunt, T., Oakes, J., Slavin, R., & Wheelock, A. (1992). Realizing our nation's diversity as an opportunity: Alternatives to sorting America's children. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt Institute for Public Policy Studies, Center for Education and Human Development Policy.
7.
Bradley, A. (1998). Schools getting heat on reading. Education Week, 17(23), 1, 16—17.
8.
Brennan, F., & Ireson, J. (1997). Training phonological awareness: A study to evaluate the effects of a program of metalinguistic games in kindergarten. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9, 241—263.
Byrne, B., & Fielding-Barnsley, R.F. (1993). Evaluation of a program to teach phonemic awareness to young children: A 1-year follow-up. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 104—111.
11.
Carnine, D., Silbert, J., & Kameenui, E.J. (1990). Direct instruction reading (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
12.
Content, A., Kolinsky, R., Morais, J., & Bertelson, P. (1986). Phonetic segmentation in prereaders: Effect of corrective information. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology , 42, 49—72.
13.
Cunningham, A.E. (1990). Explicit versus implicit instruction in phonemic awareness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 50, 429—444.
14.
Denton, C.A., Vaughn, S., & Fletcher, J.M. (2003). Bringing research-based practice in reading intervention to scale. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 18, 201—211.
15.
Elkonin, D.B. (1973). USSR. In J. Downing (Ed.), Comparative reading: Cross-national studies of behavior and processes in reading and writing (pp. 551—579). New York : Macmillan.
16.
Fox, B., & Routh, D.K. (1984). Phonemic analysis and synthesis as word attack skills: Revisited. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1059— 1064.
17.
Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L.S. (1994). Inclusive schools movement and the radicalization of special education reform. Exceptional Children, 60, 294—309.
18.
Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L.S. (1998). Researchers and teachers working together to adapt instruction for diverse learners. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 13, 126—137.
19.
Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L.S. (2005). Using peer mediation to strengthen reading comprehension in the elementary grades. In D. McNamara (Ed.), Reading comprehension strategies: Theory, interventions, and technologies. Unpublished manuscript.
20.
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., & Burish, P. (2000). Peer-assisted learning strategies: An evidence-based practice to promote reading achievement. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 15(2), 85—91.
21.
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., Mathes, P.G., & Simmons, D.C. (1997). Peer-assisted learning strategies: Making classrooms more responsive to diversity. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 174—206.
22.
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L., McMaster, K., Thompson, A., Yen, L., & Yang, N. (2005). Peer-mediated approach to fluency building and reading comprehension. Unpublished manuscript.
23.
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., Thompson, A., Al Otaiba, S., Yen, L., & Braun, M. (2000). Peer-assisted learning strategies for kindergarten: A teacher's manual. Available from www.peerassistedlearningstrategies.net
24.
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., Thompson, A., Al Otaiba, S., Yen, L., & Yang, N.J. (2000). Peer-assisted learning strategies in reading: A teacher manual (Rev. ed.). Available from Douglas Fuchs, Box 328 Peabody, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203 (or http://www.peerassistedlearningstrategies.net )
25.
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., Thompson, A., Al Otaiba, S., Yen, L., Yang, N.J., et al. (2001). Is reading important in reading-readiness programs? A randomized field trial with teachers as program implementers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 251—267.
26.
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., Thompson, A., Al Otaiba, S., Yen, L., Yang, N.J., et al. (2002). Exploring the importance of reading programs for kindergartners with disabilities in mainstream classrooms. Exceptional Children, 68, 295—311.
27.
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L., Thompson, A., Al Otaiba, S., Yen, L., & Yang, N. (2005). Respective contributions of phonological awareness and decoding to reading development in Title I and non—Title I schools . Unpublished manuscript.
28.
Fuchs, L.S., & Fuchs, D. (2000). Building student capacity to work productively during peer-assisted reading activities. In B. Taylor, M. Graves, & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Reading for meaning: Fostering comprehension in the middle grades (pp. 95—115). New York: Teachers College Press.
29.
Fuchs, L.S., & Fuchs, D. (2003). Can diagnostic reading assessment enhance general educators' instructional differentiation and student learning? In B. R. Foorman (Ed.), Preventing and remediating reading di ficulties: Bringing science to scale (pp. 325—351). Timonium, MD: York Press.
30.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Phillips, N.B., & Simmons, D. (1993). Contextual variables affecting instructional adaptation . School Psychology Review, 22, 725—742.
31.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Prentice, K., Burch, M., Hamlett, C.L., Owen, R., et al. (2003). Explicitly teaching for transfer: Effects on third-grade students' mathematical problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 293—304.
32.
Gersten, R., Vaughn, S., Deshler, D., & Schiller, E. (1995). What we know (and still don't know) about utilizing research findings to improve practice: Implications for special education . Unpublished manuscript.
33.
Graham, S., & Harris, K.R. (1997). Self-regulation and writing: Where do we go from here?Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 102—114.
Hatcher, P.J., Hulme, C., & Ellis, A.W. (1994). Ameliorating early reading failure by integrating the teaching of reading and phonological skills: The phonological linkage hypothesis. Child Development, 65, 41—57. Hodgkinson, H.L. (1995, October). What should we call people? Race, class, and the census for 2000. Phi Delta Kappan,77, 173—179.
36.
Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 437—447.
37.
Juel, C. (1996). What makes literacy tutoring effective?Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 268—289.
38.
Juel, C., Griffith, P.L., & Gough, P.B. (1986). Acquisition of literacy: A longitudinal study of children in first and second grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 243—255.
39.
Kantrowitz, B., & Underwood, A. (1999, November). Dyslexia and the new science of reading . Newsweek, 133(21), 72—77.
40.
Lundberg, I., Frost, J., & Petersen, O. (1988). Effects of an extensive program for stimulating phonological awareness in preschool children. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 263—284.
41.
Lundberg, I., Olofsson, A., & Wall, S. (1980). Reading and spelling skills in the first school years predicted from phonemic awareness skills in kindergarten. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 21, 159—173.
42.
Mathes, P., Howard, J., Allen, S., & Fuchs, D. (1998). Peer-assisted learning strategies for first grade readers: Making early reading instruction more responsive to the needs of diverse learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 33, 62—95.
43.
McIntosh, R., Vaughn, S., Schumm, J.S., Haager, D., & Lee, O. (1993). Observations of students with learning disabilities in general education classrooms. Exceptional Children, 60, 249—261.
44.
McMaster, K.L., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., & Compton, D.L. (in press). Responding to non-responders: An experimental field trial of identification and intervention methods. Exceptional Children .
45.
O'Connor, R.E., Jenkins, J.R., & Slocum, T.A. (1995). Transfer among phonological tasks in kindergarten: Essential instructional content. Journal of Educational Psychology , 87, 202—217.
46.
O'Connor, R.E., Notari-Syverson, N., & Vadasy, P. (1996). Ladders to literacy: The effects of teacher-led phonological activities for kindergarten children with and without disabilities . Exceptional Children, 63, 117—130.
47.
O'Connor, R.E., Notari-Syverson, N., & Vadasy, P. (1998a). First grade effects of teacher-led phonological activities in kindergarten for children with mild disabilities: A follow-up study. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 13, 43—52.
48.
O'Connor, R.E., Notari-Syverson, N., & Vadasy, P. (1998b). Ladders to literacy: A kindergarten activity book. Baltimore: Brookes.
49.
Olofsson, A., & Lundberg, I. (1983). Can phonemic awareness be trained in kindergarten?Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 24, 35—44.
50.
Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1994). Reciprocal teaching: A review of research. Review of Educational Research, 64, 479—530.
51.
Rosner, J. (1974). Auditory analysis training with prereaders. The Reading Teacher, 27, 379—385.
52.
Saenz, L., Fuchs, L.S., & Fuchs, D. (in press).Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies for English language learners with learning disabilities. Exceptional Children.
53.
Schneider, W., Kuspert, P., Roth, E., & Vise, M. (1997). Short- and long-term effects of training phonological awareness in kindergarten: Evidence from two German studies. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 66, 311—340.
54.
Slavin, R.E. (1994). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
55.
Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading di ficulties in young children . Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
56.
Stanovich, K.E., Cunningham, A., & Cramer, B. (1984). Assessing phonological awareness in kindergarten children: Issues of task comparability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 38, 175—190.
57.
Stevens, R.J., Madden, N.A., Slavin, R.E., & Farnish, A.M. (1987). Cooperative integrated reading and composition: Two field experiments. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 433—454.
58.
Torgesen, J.K., Wagner, R.K., & Rashotte, C.A. (1997). Prevention and re-mediation of severe reading disabilities: Keeping the end in mind. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1, 217—234.
59.
Torneus, M. (1984). Phonological awareness and reading: A chicken and egg problem?Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1346—1358.
60.
Vellutino, F.R., & Scanlon, D.M. (1987). Phonological coding, phonological awareness, and reading ability: Evidence from a longitudinal and experimental study. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 33, 321—363.
61.
Wallach, M.A., & Wallach, L. (1976). Teaching all children to read. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
62.
Weiner, S. (1994). Effects of phonemic awareness training on low- and middle-achieving first graders' phonemic awareness and reading ability . Journal of Reading Behavior, 26, 277—300.
63.
Wilder, A.A., & Williams, J.P. (2001). Students with severe learning disabilities can learn and transfer higher-order comprehension skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 268—278.
64.
Williams, J.P. (1980). Teaching decoding with an emphasis on phoneme analysis and phoneme blending. Journal of Educational Psychology , 72, 1—15.
65.
Yang, N.J., & Fuchs, D. (2004). A meta-analytic review of the e fects of repeated reading with remedial readers and students with disabilities. Unpublished manuscript.
66.
Young, C.L., & Fuchs, D. (2004). On the irrelevance of intelligence in predicting responsiveness to reading instruction. Unpublished manuscript.
