In this article the author provides the context for the 5 years of research conducted by the National Center on Accelerating Student Learning (CASL) and an introduction to key aspects of the work of the researchers. The following topics are discussed: methodology, student responsiveness to interventions, explicit and pragmatic instruction, implementation and adoption of interventions, and disseminating information about effective practices.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Blackorby, J., Chorost, M., Garza, N., & Guzman, A. (2003). The academic performance of secondary students with disabilities. In M. Wagner (General Editor), The achievements of youth with disabilities during secondary school (National Longitudinal Transition Study—2). U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs. Retrieved March 20, 2004 from http://www.nlts2.org/pdfs/achievements-ch4.pdf
2.
Carnine, D. (1991). Direct instruction applied to mathematics for the general education classroom. In J. W. Lloyd, N. N. Singh, & A. C. Repp (Eds.), The Regular Education Initiative: Alternative perspectives on concepts, issues, and models (pp. 163—175). DeKalb, IL: Sycamore.
3.
Committee on the Prevention of Reading Difficulties in Young Children, the Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, and the National Research Council. (1998). Preventing reading di ficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
4.
Fleischner, J.E., Garnett, K., & Shepherd, M.J. (1982). Proficiency in basic fact computation of learning disabled and nondisabled children. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 4, 47—56.
5.
Fletcher, J.M., Lyon, G.R., Barnes, M., Stuebing, K.K., Francis, D.J., Olson, R.K., et al. (2002). Classification of learning disabilities: An evidence-based evaluation. In R. Bradley , L. Danielson, & D. P. Hallahan (Eds.), Identification of learning disabilities: Research to practice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6.
Francis, D.J., Shaywitz, S.E., Stuebing, K.K., Shaywitz, B.A., & Fletcher, J.M. (1996). Developmental lag versus deficit models of reading disability: A longitudinal, individual growth curves analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 3—17.
7.
Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L.S., Mathes, P., & Simmons, D. (1997). Peer-assisted learning strategies: Making classrooms more responsive to student diversity. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 174—206.
8.
Fuchs, D., Roberts, P.H., Fuchs, L.S., & Bowers, J. (1996). Reintegrating students with learning disabilities into the mainstream: A two-year study. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 11, 214—229.
9.
Harris, K., Graham, S., & Mason, L. (2003). Self-regulated strategy development in the classroom: Part of a balanced approach to writing instruction for students with disabilities . Focus on Exceptional Children, 35(7), 1—14.
10.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) Amendments of 1997, P. L. 105—117, June 4, 1997.
11.
Kavale, K.A., & Reese, J.H. (1992). The character of learning disabilities: An Iowa profile. Learning Disability Quarterly, 15, 74—94.
12.
Lerner, J.W. (1989). Educational interventions in learning disabilities . Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 28(3), 326—331.
13.
Lyon, G.R. (1996). The future of children: Special education for students with disabilities. Learning Disabilities, 6, 54—76.
14.
National Center for Education Statistics. ( 2003). The nation's report card. Retrieved March 24, 2004, from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard
15.
Slocum, T. (1998, February). Assessing the long-term e fects of early direct instruction. Paper presented at the sixth annual Pacific Coast Research Conference, La Jolla, CA.
16.
SRI International. (1995). The national longitudinal transition study: Summary of findings. Retrieved March 24, 2004, from http://www.sri.com/policy/cehs/publications/dispub/nlts/nltssum.html
17.
Stedman, L.C. (1997). International achievement differences: An assessment of a new perspective. Educational Researacher, 26, 4—15.
18.
Torgesen, J.K., & Burgess, S.R. (1998). Consistency of reading-related phonological processes throughout early childhood: Evidence from longitudinal—correlational and instructional studies. In J. Metsala & L. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning reading. Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.
19.
Williams, J. (1996, April). Research and instruction in reading comprehension: Continuities and discontinuities. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York City.
20.
Williams, J. (2003). Teaching text structure to improve reading comprehension . In H. L. Swanson, K. R. Harris, & S. Graham. (Eds.), Handbook of learning disabilities (pp. 293—305). New York: Guilford Press.
