Alignment of an Alternate Assessment with State Academic Standards

Abstract

In this article, the authors describe an alignment and content analysis of the Wisconsin Alternate Assessment (WAA) for students with disabilities. The WAA is an assessment of the academic performance of students with significant disabilities and is an alternative to the traditional on-demand achievement test. Alternate assessments like the WAA are required by federal law and are expected to be aligned with state content standards. The primary purpose of this investigation was to determine the extent to which the WAA adequately measured the concepts and skill areas represented in Wisconsin's Model Academic Standards. The ratings of an expert panel (N = 10) that participated in the WAA Alignment Institute provided data regarding the alignment of WAA items to the standards. The expert panel's responses indicated that the WAA generally meets the multifaceted criteria developed by Webb (1997) and advocated by Title I reviewers for acceptable alignment between assessments and curriculum expectations as articulated in academic content standards.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Browder, D.M. , Fallin, K. , Davis, S. , & Karvonen, M. (2003). Consideration of what may influence student outcomes on alternate assessment. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 255—270.

Browder, D.M. , Flowers, C. , Ahlgrim-Delzill, L. , Karvonen, M. , Spooner, F. , & Algozzine, R. (2002, April). Curricular implications of alternate assessments . Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.

Browder, D.M. , Spooner, F. , Algozzine, R. , Ahlgrim-Delzell, L. , Flowers, C. , & Karvonen, M. (2003). What we know and need to know about alternate assessment. Exceptional Children, 70, 45—61.

Council of Chief State School Officers. (2002 ). Models for alignment analysis and assistance to states. Retrieved May 13, 2002, from http://www.ccsso.org/pdf/AlignmentModels.pdf

Elliott, S.N. (2001). Enhancing the Wisconsin Alternate Assessment project proposal. Madison: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction.

Elliott, S.N. , Braden, J.B. , & White, J.L. (2001). Assessing one and all: Educational accountability for students with disabilities. Arlington, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.

Ford, A. , Davern, L. , & Schnorr, R. (2001). Learners with significant disabilities: Curricular relevance in an era of standards-based reform. Remedial and Special Education, 22, 214—222.

Kleinert, H.L. , & Kearns, J.F. (1999). A validation study of the performance indicators and learner outcomes of Kentucky's Alternate Assessment for students with significant disabilities. The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 24, 100—110.

Lane, S. (1999, October). Validity evidence for assessments. Paper presented at the Edward F. Reidy Interactive Lecture Series , The National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment, Providence, RI.

10.

Quenemoen, R. , Massanari, C. , Thompson, S. , & Thurlow, M. (2000). Alternate assessment forum: Connecting into a whole. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Retrieved October 2, 2002, from http://education.umnedu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/Forum2000/ForumReport2000.htm

11.

Shrout, P.E. , & Fliess, J.L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420—428.

12.

Thompson, S.J. , Quenemoen, R.F. , Thurlow, M.L. , & Ysseldyke, J.E. (2001). Alternate assessment for students with disabilities. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

13.

Thompson, S. , & Thurlow, M. (2003). 2003 state special education outcomes: Marching on. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Retrieved March 1, 2004, from http://education.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/2003StateReport.htm

14.

Thompson, S. , & Thurlow, M. (2001). 2001 state special education outcomes: A report on state activities at the beginning of a new decade. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Retrieved December 15, 2003, from http://education.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/2001StateReport.html

15.

Thurlow, M. , Olsen, K. , Elliott, J. , Yssledyke, J. , Erickson, R. , & Ahern, E. (1996). Alternate assessments for students with disabilities . NCEO Policy Directions, 5, 1—6.

16.

Webb, N.L. (1997). Criteria for alignment of expectations and assessments in mathematics and science education (NISE Research Monograph No. 6). Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison, National Institute for Science Education.

17.

Webb, N.L. (2002, April). An analysis of the alignment between mathematics standards and assessments for three states. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association , New Orleans, LA.

18.

Webb, N.L. , Horton, M. , & O'Neal, S. (2002, April). An analysis of the alignment between language arts standards and assessments in four states. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.

19.

Ysseldyke, J.E. , & Olsen, K.R. (1997). Putting alternate assessments into practice: What to measure and possible sources of data. Exceptional Children , 65, 175—186.