This study investigated the effectiveness and efficiency of a 4-second time delay instructional package and language of instruction with regard to the percentage correct of English sight words and incidental information by 4 Puerto Rican middle school students with mental retardation. A multiple probe across students with a parallel treatments design that compared Spanish and English constant time delay intervention conditions was employed to teach sight words from local grocery and department stores. Incidental information was provided contingent on correct responding during intervention. Results indicated that both Spanish and English time delay conditions were equally effective and efficient when compared with a no-treatment condition in promoting English sight word reading for 3 of the 4 participants, whereas Spanish time delay was seen to be more effective and efficient than English time delay and no-treatment conditions for the other participant. All 4 participants generalized word reading from the classroom to the natural setting (i.e., stores in the community) and learned most of the incidental information. Implications for practice and directions for future research with respect to language of instruction are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abbot, R.E., & Peterson, P.J. (1975). Learning disabilities—They're all around you. Paper presented at the International Bilingual-Bicultural Education Conference, Chicago.
2.
Ault, M.J., Gast, D.L., & Wolery, M. (1988). Comparison of progressive and constant time delay procedures in teaching community sign word reading. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 93, 44—56.
3.
Baca, L., & Cervantes, H. (1989). The bilingual special education interface (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
4.
Baca, L., & Cervantes, H. (1991, May). Bilingual special education (Publication No. E496). Reston, VA: Clearinghouse on Handicapped and Gifted Children, Council of Exceptional Children.
5.
Browder, D.M., Hines, C., McCarthy, L.J., & Fees, J. (1984). A treatment package for increasing sight word recognition for use in daily living skills. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 19, 191—200.
6.
Browder, D.M., & Lalli, J.S. (1991). Review of research on sight word instruction. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 12, 203—228.
7.
Browder, D.M., & Snell, M.E. (2000). Functional academics. In M. E. Snell (Ed.), Systematic instruction of people with severe disabilities (5th ed., pp. 345—401). New York: Macmillan.
8.
Browder, D.M., & Xin, X. (1999). A review and metanalysis of sight word instruction with students with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education , 32, 150—153.
9.
Collier, V.P. (1992). A synthesis of studies examining long-term language minority student data on academic achievement. Bilingual Research Journal, 16(1/2), 187—212.
10.
Conners, F. (1992). Reading instruction for students with moderate mental retardation: Review and analysis of research. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 96, 557—597.
11.
Cummins, J. (1981). Empirical and theoretical underpinnings of bilingual education. Journal of Education, 163(1), 16—29.
12.
Cummins, J. (1984). Bilingualism and special education: Issues in assessment and pedagogy. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
13.
Cummins, J., & Nichols-McNeely, S. (1987). Language development, academic learning and empowering minority students. In S. H. Fradd & W. J. Tikunoff (Eds.), Bilingual education and bilingual special education: A guide for administrators (pp. 75—98). Boston: College-Hill.
14.
Deitz, S.M., & Malone, L.W. (1985). Stimulus control terminology. The Behavior Analyst, 8, 259—264.
15.
Doyle, P.M., Schuster, J.W., & Meyer, S. (1996). Embedding extra stimuli in the task direction: Effects on learning of students with moderate mental retardation. The Journal of Special Education, 29, 381—399.
16.
Dunn, L.M., & Dunn, L.M. (1981). Peabody picture vocabulary test— Revised . Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
17.
Dunn, L.M., Padilla, E.R., Lugo, D.E., & Dunn, L.M. (1986). Test de vocabulario en imagenes Peabody: Adaptacion Hispanoamericana. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
18.
Duran, E. (1985). Teaching functional reading in context to severely retarded and severely autistic adolescents of limited English proficiency . Adolescence, 20, 434—439.
19.
Duran, E. (1989). Functional language instruction for the student with moderate and severe handicaps and students who are culturally and linguistically different. Reading Improvement, 26(1), 33—36.
20.
Duran, E. (1992). Effective communication programming for language minority students with severe disabilities. Paper presented at the Second National Symposium on Effective Communication for Children and Youth with Severe Disabilities, McLean, VA .
21.
Duran, E., & Heiry, T.J. (1986). Comparison of Spanish only, Spanish and English only cues with handicapped students. Reading Improvement, 23(2), 138—141.
22.
Edmark Corp. (1991). Edmark reading program, Level 2, Book 2,Word recognition words 200-250 (2nd ed.). Redmond, WA: Author.
23.
Erickson, J.G., & Walker, C.L. (1983). Bilingual exceptional children: What are the issues ? In D. R. Omark & J. G. Erickson (Eds.), The bilingual exceptional child (pp. 3—23). San Diego, CA: College-Hill.
24.
Fradd, S.H. (1987). Accommodating the needs of limited English proficient students in regular classrooms. In S. H. Fradd & W. J. Tikunoff (Eds.), Bilingual education and bilingual special education: A guide for administrators (pp. 133—182). Boston: College-Hill.
25.
Garcia, E. (1990). The education of linguistically and culturally diverse students: E fective instructional practices (Cooperative Agreement No. R117G1002). Santa Cruz, CA: The National Center for Research on Cultural Diversity and Second Language Learning.
26.
Garcia, S.B., & Malkin, D.H. (1993). Toward defining programs and services for culturally and linguistically diverse learners in special education. Teaching Exceptional Children, 26(1), 52—58.
27.
Gast, D.L., Ault, M.J., Wolery, M., Doyle, P.M., & Belanger, S. (1988). Comparison of constant time delay and the system of least prompts in teaching sight word reading to students with moderate retardation. Education and Training in Mental Retardation , 23, 117—128.
28.
Gast, D.L., & Wolery, M. (1988). Parallel Treatments design: A nested single subject design for comparing instructional procedures. Education and Treatment of Children, 11, 270—285.
29.
Gast, D.L., Wolery, M., Morris, L.L., Doyle, P.M., & Meyer, L.L. (1990). Teaching sight word reading in a group instructional arrangement using constant time delay. Exceptionality, 1, 81—96.
30.
Gersten, R.M. (1993, April). The language minority student in transition: Exploring the parameters of e fective literacy instruction. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA.
31.
Gersten, R., Baker, S.K., Scott, K., & Marks, S. (1998). Teaching English-language learners with learning di ficulties: Guiding principles and examples from research-based practice . Reston, VA: Council of Exceptional Children.
32.
Gersten, R., Brengelman, S., & Jimenez, R. (1994). Effective instruction for culturally and linguistically diverse students: A reconceptualization. Focus on Exceptional Children, 27(1), 1—16.
33.
Gersten, R.M., & Jimenez, R.T. (1992). A delicate balance: Enhancing literacy instruction for language-minority students. Unpublished manuscript.
34.
Heward, W.L. (2000). Exceptional children (6th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
Koury, M., & Browder, D.M. (1986). The use of delay to teach sight words by peer tutors classified as moderately mentally retarded. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 21, 252—258.
37.
Krashen, S.D. (1981). Bilingual education and second language acquisition theory. In California State Department of Education, Office of Bilingual Bicultural Education (Ed.), Schooling and language minority students: A theoretical framework (pp. 51—79). Los Angeles: California State University, Evaluation and Dissemination and Assessment Center .
38.
Lalli, J.S., & Browder, D.M. (1993). Comparison of sight word training procedures with validation of the most practical procedure in teaching reading for daily living . Research in Developmental Disabilities, 14, 107— 127.
39.
Moll, L.C. (1988). Some key issues in teaching Latino students. Language Arts, 65, 465—472.
40.
Ortiz, A.A. (1984a). Choosing the language of instruction for exceptional bilingual children. Exceptional Children, 16, 208—212.
41.
Ortiz, A.A. (1984b). Language and curriculum development for exceptional bilingual children. In P. C. Chinn (Ed.), Education of culturally and linguistically di ferent exceptional children (pp. 77—100). Reston, VA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 256 107)
42.
Oswald, L.K., Lignugaris/Kraft, B., & West, R. (1990). The effects of incidental teaching on the generalized use of social amenities at school by a mildly handicapped adolescent. Education and Treatment of Children, 13(2), 142—152.
43.
Ovando, C.J., & Collier, V.P. (1985). Bilingual and ESL classrooms. New York: McGraw-Hill.
44.
Reddy, M. (Ed.). (1993). Statistical record of Hispanic Americans. Detroit: Gale Research.
45.
Rodriguez, V.M. (1998). Problems and issues in the education of culturally and linguistically diverse preschool children with disabilities. Equity and Excellence in Education, 31(2), 39—46.
46.
Rohena-Diaz, E. (1995). Perception of parents and teachers toward the education of students with multiple disabilities who are linguistically diverse . Unpublished manuscript, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA.
47.
Rohena-Diaz, E., & Browder, D.M. (1996). Functional reading for students with developmental disabilities who are linguistically diverse. Journal of Behavioral Education, 6(1), 25—33.
48.
Sindelar, P.T., Rosenberg, M.S., & Wilson, R.J. (1985). An adapted alternating treatments design for instructional research. Education and Treatment of Children, 8, 67—76.
49.
Slaton, D.E., Schuster, J., Collins, B., & Carnine, D. (1994). A functional approach to academic instruction . In E. Cipani & F. Spooner (Eds.), Curricular and instructional approaches for persons with severe disabilities (pp. 149—183). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
50.
Sletter, C.E., & Grant, C.A. (1988). Making choices for multicultural education. New York: Macmillan.
51.
Sparrow, S.J., Balla, D.A., & Cicchetti, D.V. (1984). Vineland adaptive behavior scales: Interview edition, survey form manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
52.
Special Education Standards and Regulations of the Pennsylvania State Department of Education, §342.1. (Pennsylvania Bulletin 1990).
53.
Tawney, J.W., & Gast, D.L. (1984). Single subject research in special education. Columbus, OH: Merrill
Tikunoff, W.J. (1987). Mediation of instruction to obtain equality of effectiveness. In S. H. Fradd & W. J. Tikunoff (Eds.), Bilingual education and bilingual special education: A guide for administrators (pp. 9—132). Boston: College-Hill.
56.
Weaver, R., Landers, M.F., & Adams, S. (1991). Making curriculum functional: Special education and beyond. Intervention in School and Clinic, 26, 284—287.
57.
Wechsler, D. (1991). Wechsler intelligence scale for children (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
58.
Werts, M.G., Wolery, M., Holcombe, A., & Frederick, C. (1993). Effects of instructive feedback related and unrelated to the target behaviors. Exceptionality, 4(2), 81—96.
59.
Wolery, M., Ault, M.J., & Doyle, P.M. (1992). Teaching students with moderate to severe disabilities . New York: Longman.
60.
Yates, J.R. (1992). Demography as it affects special education. In A. A. Ortiz & B. A. Ramirez (Eds.), Schools and the culturally diverse exceptional student: Promising practices and future directions (pp. 1—5). Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
