Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The revision of the University of Maryland Special Education Department 5-year undergraduate teacher preparation program is described. For 20 years this 5-year program has had a categorical disability focus, preparing special educators to work with students across a wide range of ages and grades. A recent program graduate's reflections on her first year of teaching illuminate key issues addressed in revising our program to focus on multicategorical special education teacher preparation across a more refined age/grade base. Key issues include collaboration and coordination between general and special education, development of professional communities, and preparation of teachers to be change agents involved in school stewardship. Feedback from professionals in the field, research on school reform and best practices, and review of professional standards also informed our shift to multicategorical preparation. Key program components include: selective admissions, 3 years of intensive field placements and internship integrated with university coursework, selection of a multicategorical age-based specialization, and opportunity to earn graduate credit while completing the undergraduate program.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Billingsley, B.S. , & Tomchin, E.M. (1992). Four beginning LD teachers: What their experiences suggest for trainers and employers. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 7, 104-112.

Carnine, D. (1997). Bridging the research-to-practice gap. Exceptional Children, 63, 513-521.

Council for Exceptional Children. (1998). What every special educator must know: The international standards for the preparation and licensure of special educators (3rd ed.). Reston, VA: Author.

Cross, L. , & Walker-Knight, D. (1997). Inclusion: Developing collaborative and cooperative school communities. Educational Forum, 61, 269-277.

Darling-Hammond, L. (1998). Teachers and teaching: Testing policy hypotheses from a national commission report. Educational Researcher , 27,5-15.

Ferguson, D.L. , & Ralph, G.R. (1996). The changing role of special educators: A development waiting for a change. Contemporary Education, 68, 49-51.

Gersten, R. , Morvant, M. , & Brengelman, S. (1995). Close to the classroom is close to the bone: Coaching as a means to translate research into classroom practice. Exceptional Children, 62, 52-66.

Goodlad, J.I. , & Field, S. (1993). Teachers for renewing schools. In J. I. Goodlad & T. C. Lovitt (Eds.), Integrating general and special education (pp. 229-252). New York: Macmillan.

Kilgore, K.L. , & Griffin, C.C. (1998). Beginning special educators: Problems of practice and the influence of school context. Teacher Education and Special Education, 21, 155-173.

10.

Lieberman, A. , & Miller, L. (2000). Teaching and teacher development: A new synthesis for a new century. In R. S. Brandt (Ed.), Education in a new era: ASCD yearbook 2000 (pp. 47-66). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

11.

Lindsey, P. , & Strawderman, C. (1995). The quest for teachers: On reviewing a decade of reform efforts. Teacher Education and Special Education, 18, 253-261.

12.

Malouf, D.B. , & Schiller, E.P. (1995). Practice and research in special education. Exceptional Children, 61, 414-424.

13.

National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities. (2000). Professional development for teachers. Learning Disability Quarterly, 23, 2-6.

14.

Putnam, R.T. , & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher , 29, 4-15.

15.

Spencer, D.E. (1996). Teachers and educational reform. Educational Researcher, 25, 15-17, 40.

Preparation,Practice,and Program Reform

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References