Twenty middle school students with reading-related learning disabilities were interviewed on two occasions to better understand their perceptions about (a) their reading ability, (b) procedures used to assist with reading instruction and the extent to which they were perceived as useful, (c) purposes for involvement in explicit reading instruction, and (d) reading instruction that might improve their reading ability. Findings revealed that despite considerable past challenges in learning to read, all of the students indicated willingness to learn to read and recognized the importance of reading to later successes in getting and keeping a job. Many stated that there was something wrong with them and that is why they had difficulty. Also, the students did not mind participating in what might be perceived as elementary or basic work in reading if it would lead to better reading skills for them. They expressed concern that they would be embarrassed if friends recognized that they were learning to read.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Ackerman, P.T., Dykman, R.A., & Peters, J.E. (1977). Learning disabled boys as adolescents: Cognitive factors and achievement. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 16, 296-313.
2.
Ackerman, P.T., Weir, N.L., Metzler, D.P., & Dykman, R.A. (1996). A study of adolescent poor readers. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 11, 68-77.
3.
Alley, G., & Deshler, D. (1979). Teaching the learning disabled adolescent: Strategies and methods. Denver: Love.
4.
Allington, R.L., & McGill-Franzen, A. (1989). School response to reading failure: Instruction for chapter one and special education students grades two, four and eight. Elementary School Journal, 89, 529-542.
5.
Alvermann, D.E., Young, J.P., Weaver, D., Hinchman, K.A., Moore, D.W., Phelps, S.F., Thrash, E.C., & Zalewski, P. (1996). Middle and high school students' perceptions of how they experience text-based discussions: A multicase study. Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 244-267.
6.
Bintz, W.P. (1993). Resistant readers in secondary education: Some insights and implications. Journal of Reading, 36, 604-615.
7.
Brown, L., Sherbenou, R., & Johnson, S. (1990). Test of nonverbal intelligence (2nd ed.). Austin: PRO-ED .
8.
Bryant, D.P., Vaughn, S., Linan-Thompson, S., Ugel, N., & Hamff, A. (2000). Reading outcomes for students with and without learning disabilities in general education middle school content area classes . Learning Disability Quarterly.
9.
Cline, R.K.L., & Kretke, G.L. (1980). An evaluation of long-term SSR in the junior high school. Journal of Reading, 23, 502-506.
10.
Deshler, D.D., Ellis, E.S., & Lenz, B.K. (1996). Teaching adolescents with learning disabilities: Strategies and methods (2nd ed.). Denver: Love.
11.
Greene, J.F. (1998). Another chance. American Educator , 22 (1, 2), 74-81.
12.
Greene, J.F. (1999). Another chance: Help for older students with limited literacy. Perspectives, 25(3), 5-10.
13.
Guthrie, J.T., Wigfield, A., Metsala, J.L., & Cox, K.E. (1999). Motivational and cognitive predictors of text comprehension and reading amount. Scientific Studies of Reading , 3, 231-256.
14.
Haynes, M.C., & Jenkins, J.R. (1986). Reading instruction in special education resource rooms. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 161-190.
15.
Ivey, G. (1999). A multicase study in the middle school: Complexities among young adolescent readers. Reading Research Quarterly , 34, 172-192.
16.
Klingner, J.K., Vaughn, S., Hughes, M.T., Schumm, J.S., & Elbaum, B.E. (1998). Outcomes for students with and without learning disabilities in inclusive classrooms. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 13, 153-161.
17.
Kos, R. (1991). Persistence of reading disabilities: The voices of four middle school students. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 875-895.
18.
Lyon, G.R. (1997). Testimony of G. Reid Lyon on Children's Literacy . American Psychological Association ( APA Science Advocacy), Before the Committee on Education and the Workforce, U. S. House of Representatives, Washington, D. C., Thursday, July 10, 1997 (pp. 1-9).
19.
Lyon, G.R. ( 1996). Special education for students with disabilities . The Future of Children, 6, 1-16.
20.
McIntosh, R., Vaughn, S., Schumm, J.S., Haager, D., & Lee, O. (1993). Observations of students with learning disabilities in general education classrooms. Exceptional Children, 60, 249-261.
21.
McKenna, M.C., Kear, D.J., & Ellsworth, R.A. (1995). Children's attitudes toward reading. A national survey. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 934-955.
22.
Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A source-book of new methods. Beverly Hills: Sage.
23.
Moody, S.W., Vaughn, S., Hughes, M.T., & Fischer, M. (2000). Reading instruction in the resource room: Set up for failure. Exceptional Children, 66, 305-316.
24.
Morris, D., Ervin, C., & Conrad, K. (1996). A case study of middle school reading disability . The Reading Teacher, 49, 368-377.
25.
O'Connor, J., & Wilson, B. (1995). Effectiveness of the Wilson Reading System used in public school training. In C. McIntyre & J. Pickering (Eds.), Clinical studies of multisensory structured language education (pp. 247-254). Salem, OR: International Multisensory Structured Language Education Council.
26.
Reetz, L.J., & Hoover, J.H. (1992). The acceptability and utility of five reading approaches as judged by middle school LD students. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 7, 11-15.
27.
Reimers, T.W., Wacker, D.P., & Koeppl, G. (1987). Acceptability of behavioral interventions: A review of the literature. School Psychology Review, 16, 212-227.
28.
Shapiro, J., & White, W. (1991). Reading attitudes and perceptions in traditional and nontraditional reading programs. Reading Research and Instruction, 30, 52-66.
29.
Singh, N.N., & Katz, R.C. (1985). On the modification of acceptability ratings for alternative child treatments. Behavior Modification, 9, 375-386.
30.
Snow, C.E., Bums, S.M., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children . Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
31.
Stanovich, K.E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360-407.
32.
Torgesen, J.K. (2000). Individual differences in response to early interventions in reading: The lingering problem of treatment resisters. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 55-64.
33.
Torgesen, J.K., Wagner, R.K., & Rashotte, C.A. (1994). Longitudinal studies of psychological processing and reading. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 276-286.
34.
Torgesen, J.K., Wagner, R.K., Rashotte, C.A., Alexander, A.W., & Conway, T. (1997). Preventive and remedial interventions for children with severe reading disabilities. Learning Disabilities, 8(1), 51-61.
35.
United States Department of Education. (1994 ). National Assessment of Educational Progress.
36.
United States Department of Education. (1996 ). National Assessment of Educational Progress.
37.
United States Department of Education. (1998 ). National Assessment of Educational Progress.
38.
Vaughn, S., Moody, S.W., & Schumm, J.S. (1998). Broken promises: Reading instruction in the resource room. Exceptional Children, 64, 211-225.
39.
Von Brock, J.B., & Elliot, S.N. (1987). Influence of treatment effectiveness information on the acceptability of classroom interventions. Journal of School Psychology, 25, 131-144.
40.
Wigfield, A. (1997). Children's motivations for reading and reading engagement. In J. T. Guthrie & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Reading engagement: Motivating readers through integrated instruction (pp. 14-33). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Worthy, J., & McKool, S.S. (1996). Students who say they hate to read: The importance of opportunity, choice, and access. In D. J. Leu, C. K. Kinzer, & K. A. Hinchman (Eds.), Literacies for the 21st century: Research and practice. [45th yearbook of the National Reading Conference] (pp. 245-256). Chicago: National Reading Conference.
44.
Worthy, J., Moorman, M., & Turner, M. (1999). What Johnny likes to read is hard to find in school . Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 12-27.
45.
Yin, R.K. (1989). Case study research: Design and methods. (Rev. ed.), Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
46.
Ysseldyke, J.E., Thurlow, M.A., Mecklenburg, C., & Garden, J. (1984). Opportunity to learn for regular and special education students during reading instruction. Remedial and Special Education, 5(1), 29-37.
